Re: Graphical shells

From: Karl-Heinz Zimmer (khz@stardivision.de)
Date: Wed May 10 2000 - 08:48:50 CEST


On 10.05.00, 08:38:01, Martin Doering wrote:

> Ok!

> Someone could code programs by concatenating icons and
> for example configure their parameters, but this would
> take 10 times as long as writing it just down in a shell.

Of course you are right but there could be a situation
where speed doesn't matter: imagine a student who tries
to teach herself/himself the syntax of BaSH skripts and
by using that module she/he would ba able to plug together
the modules and at the same time SEE THE RESULTING SKRIPT
appearing step by step in a little command window.

> If you need to code, you need to code - no way 'round.

:-)

Perhaps the graphical BaSH command generator could make
people understand the way code such should be written
and probably (after a short training phase) they would
soon ignore the existence of that tool and write their
own code - once they have learned how to do it.

Karl-Heinz (privat unterwegs)

-- 
K.-H. Zimmer            http://home.snafu.de/khz/index.html
Hamburg                 * muLinux
Germany                 * KDE Programming Tutorial
                        * The Absolute Beginner's Guide to KDevelop
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.auc.dk
For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.auc.dk


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:14 CET