From: Martin_Doering@mn.man.de
Date: Wed May 10 2000 - 08:38:01 CEST
Ok!
Someone could code programs by concatenating icons and for example configure
their parameters, but this would take 10 times as long as writing it just down
in a shell.
I think graphicle user interfaces are mostly good for providing users
preconfigured environments/apps, and they just use it. But this would be also an
unflexible way for othere tasks. So the windows way, to provide wizards for all
possible things is bad, I think. I f you need to code, you need to code - no way
'round.
My goal would be an operatingsystem environment, which has graphicle
capabilities for displaying things, but would integrate with a good interpretive
language - maybe more powerfull than shell. I think of something like TCL/TK,
but I don't like this language. The same for perl. Bad, that python does not
have it's own native GUI, like TCL has.
Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.auc.dk
For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.auc.dk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:14 CET