[Re: [pci] spec]

[jamil khatib <jamilkhatib@netscape.net>]

Yes Damjan, you are right I should not do it.
I am going to delete the file and try to get PCI 2.2 spec in the official way.
Meanwhile I am going to continue working using the Atera and Xilinx PCI
databooks and all free information on the web


"Damjan Lampret" <damjan.lampret@arnes.si> wrote:
I've contacted PCI SIG if we can publish PCI spec on web only for our
internal use or something like that. I've received response from law firm
that represents PCI SIG and they say they might sue anybody involved in
distributing PCI spec (even if you only downloaded spec from some XY site
etc).


----- Original Message -----
From: jamil khatib <jamilkhatib@netscape.net>
To: <pci@opencores.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 2:33 PM
Subject: [pci] spec


> I've got PCI 2.1 spec from the news group
> I do not know if I have the permission to distribute it but any how I'll
send
> it to those who will contribute to the PCI design only
>
> Anyone one intrested?
>

I would be careful with statements like this. We might get in trouble.

regards, Damjan




pls: replay to khatib@ieee.org

Thanks
Jamil Khatib
OpenIP Organization http:/www.openip.org
OpenIPCore Project  http://www.openip.org/oc
OpenCores  Project  http://www.opencores.org

____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com.