[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [openrisc] [PATCH] Would you like to have UART0 in a xterm ?

To: openrisc@opencores.org
Subject: Re: [openrisc] [PATCH] Would you like to have UART0 in a xterm ?
From: Marko Mlinar <markom@opencores.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:49:22 +0200
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0210281319420.9223-100000@step.polymtl.ca>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0210281319420.9223-100000@step.polymtl.ca>
Reply-To: openrisc@opencores.org
Sender: owner-openrisc@opencores.org
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1

On Monday 28 October 2002 19:20, Richard Prescott wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Marko Mlinar wrote:
> > I just remembered -- there is a testbench for or1ksim. Since it is a part
> > of or1ksim and it will be eventually a test besides current uClinux test
> > for or1ksim/or1k toolchain ATS, please take try to run it with your new
> > changes (meaning you will have to edit .cfg files there).
>
> Sadly, UART doesn't seem to be part of testbench. :-(
huh, you are right -- if you run "make check" no uart tests are run.

However there is quite extensive testbench for UART, called acv_uart ;) -- you 
will also need to download /vapi from CVS to run it.

Does anyone have some simple uart test? I have hello world, maybe it would be 
nice if we can add it to "make check" ?

Marko

--
To unsubscribe from openrisc mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml

References:
- Re: [openrisc] [PATCH] Would you like to have UART0 in a xterm ?
  - From: Richard Prescott <rip@step.polymtl.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: [openrisc] [PATCH] Would you like to have UART0 in a xterm ?
Next by Date: [openrisc] Re: Re: questions about your program "jp1.c"
Prev by thread: Re: [openrisc] [PATCH] Would you like to have UART0 in a xterm ?
Next by thread: Re: [openrisc] [PATCH] Would you like to have UART0 in a xterm ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread