Re: [openrisc] Address pipeline during exception...

["Marko Mlinar" <Marko.Mlinar@campus.fri.uni-lj.si>]

> > You should not try to simulate OR1200 internal
> > pipeline. You should simulate OR1K architecture
> > instead with insn safely assumed to execute in one
> > clock cycle etc. If OR1K architecture manual does
> > not precisely define how something should be
> > handled, don't rely on OR1200 implementation.
> 
> This is great for you, but it doesn't solve my problem.
> I want a cycle to cycle accurate simulator of Or1200
> so that I can port operating systems. I'm not looking
> to develop a generic simulator that future Or1k
> designers can build from.
Chris, please have in mind that operating system
have to be portable between different or1k implementations.
So, rather than concentrating on or1200 details, we should
define or1k architecture in more detail instead.

Marko