[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[oc] Top-Down Vs Bottom-Up
Hi All,
My question may seem very trivial, but it is pretty tricky in my opinion. I request to be corrected where ever I go wrong.
Question is: In Basic Digital design, how do we distinguish Top-Down approach and bottom-up approach? Will there be any difference in the RTL source files I obtain following these apporaches? If no, then how do we define them, apart from the text-book definition, which says, "In Top-down approach, the algorithmic level of the problem is first stated, then the problem is modularized, so as to use a divide-and-design approach till a possible lowest level is obtained." and "In Bottom-up approach, the existing lowest level module is used in building a superior task and that is further used in building a more superior task and so on".
I could define the two terms at the synthesis level (using DC terminology, of-course) as follows:
Top-Down compile would mean I would read-in the whole of my design to the memory, apply my optimization constraints at the top-level only and then compile. In case of a re-compilation, I would still have the top-module as my reference and apply attributes and constraints to my sub-designs using hierarchical definitions.
Bottom-Up compile would mean I would read-in one sub-module at a time, with my sub-design-specific constraint files, compile each of them independantly, finally read-in my top-module, then link and compile with top-level constraints.
Thanks and Regards,
R. Ramakrishna
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software