[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bluetooth] FH Selector implementaion query...
Hi Anil and Jamil,
Long time have not heard from you,how are you??
I have finally finished the FH Selection Kernel but just for 79hop system.Currently i just do my verilog coding is in behavioral level. I will change them to RTL level one day,quite busy recently.
I will send you my code and the general description to you,there are total 7files. please give me advices.
One last question: Can you tell me how is the design for Data de-scrambler??
Thank you
Best Regards
Anil Nainwal - Sofblueindia <anilnainwal@sofblueindia.com> WROTE :-
>From : Anil Nainwal - Sofblueindia <anilnainwal@sofblueindia.com>
TO : ChuanChew Sin <ccsin@k7mail.com>
CC : bluetooth@opencores.org, Jamil Khatib <khatib@opencores.org>
Subject : Re: Re: Re: CRC sample dataquestion??pls reply ASAP
Message Follows-:
Dear Chuan,
I went through your code.
The problem that I could see is:
In your module crc_ccitt , You have defined output [`BITS_OUT-1:0] crc_out;
This means that MSB is bit 15(16th bit) and LSB is bit 0. Fine..
Now, UAP is 47 that is (0100 0111) with LSB on the left most side i.e UP0(LSB) is 0 and UP7(MSB) is 1.--------(1)
Now, in both test benches, you have defined reg [`BYTE-1:0] uap, this means if written in a format of (ABCD EFGH) , A will be MSB and H is LSB
CASE 1: Now, when you initialize uap in test bench crc_sim you are initializing it as
uap= `BYTE'h47; ie 0100 0111
it means msb (UP7) is 0 and LSB (UP0) is 1. now compare it with (1) and you will find it's mismatching. So here is the problem.
CASE 2: When you initialize UAP in crc_sim1, what you are doing is.
uap= `BYTE'h2e; ie 0010 1110.
This means MSB (UP7) is 0,. UP5= 1. UP1=1 and LSB(UP0)=0.
Now compare it again with (1) and you will find all the bits are mismatching.
I think Similar kind of problem is there while initializing others.
Solution:
If you have defined reg [`BYTE-1:0] uap, then initialize uap as (1110 0010) that comes to be E2. and not 2E.
But check the same problem while initializing other parameters as well.
Then one more solution that comes to my mind is you define reg [0:`BYTE-1] uap, and then initialize it as in CASE 1, ie 47 (0100 0111) this will make 0 as MSB and 1 as LSB. And this is same as (1), I havenot tried it yet but you try and then please tell me if it works.
But do take care while initializing others, this is one basic problem i could see on first go, I will check it more. but till then you try this and also check that other initializations are fine.
you are welcome to put your queries....
If I am wrong..plz let me know.. suggestions will be appreciated.
Best Regards
Anil Nainwal
----- Original Message -----
From: "ChuanChew Sin" <ccsin@k7mail.com>
To: <anilnainwal@sofblueindia.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 7:31 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: CRC sample dataquestion??pls reply ASAP
> Hi Anil Nainwal,
>
> Sorry to bother you again.
>
> Have you checked the code I sent to you yesterday??I really hope that you could find out the problem that i'm facing right now.
>
> Best regards.
>
> Chuan Chew
add_mod79.v
add_mod32.v
btf.v