From: Michele Andreoli (m.andreoli@tin.it)
Date: Tue Feb 06 2001 - 10:11:20 CET
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 08:21:39PM -0800, Bob Romprey nicely wrote:
> Michele,
> I think we may have a misunderstanding here.
> It seems there's two different scenarios that are being discussed.
> If I'm not mistaken the scenario you speak of looks like this,
> +---------------+
> +-------------+ |192.168.1.2 |
> | 192.168.1.1 |-------+user machine 1 |
> Internet<----+ IP_Masq | |web browser+ftp|
> | http server | |client+misc |
> | ftp server | +---------------+
> |telnet deamon| +---------------+
> |vnc deamon |-------|192.168.1.3 |
> +-------------+ |user machine 2 |
> |web browser+ftp|
> |client+misc |
> +---------------+
> with all externally available services residing on the IP_Masq'd "router".
> What I'm talking about looks more like this.
>
>
> +----------------+
> |192.168.1.2 |
> +------------+--port80-|httpd deamon |
> |192.168.1.1 | +----------------+
> Internet<--+IP_Masq'd | +----------------+
> |router only |--port21-+ 192.168.1.3 |
> |no other | |ftpd deamon |
> |user | +----------------+
> |services | +----------------+
> | |---------+192.168.1.4 |
> | | |user machine 1 |
> | | +----------------+
> | | +----------------+
> | |---------|192.168.1.5 |
> | | |user machine 2 |
> +------------+ +----------------+
> In the first scenario muLinux setup is very simple if not automatic.
> In the second "freesco" is easier for beginning users.
>
The difference between the two scenarios is matter of port-forwarding,
and maybe a couple of commands.
Why do not implement in muLinux and contribute the stuff?
Michele
-- In summing up, I wish I had some kind of affirmative message to leave you with, I don't. Would you take two negative messages? - Woody Allen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.dk For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.dk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:18 CET