Re: [mu TECH] No real need for DOS installation proggy !

From: Michele Andreoli (andreoli@pisoft.it)
Date: Sat Jan 23 1999 - 20:03:06 CET

Next message: Michele Andreoli: "[mu ANNOUNCE] Release 3.2"
Previous message: Andrea Manzini: "Re: [mu TECH] Umssync troubble!"
In reply to: sime1brt: "Re: [mu TECH] No real need for DOS installation proggy !"
Next in thread: Michele Andreoli: "Re: DOS installation proggy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 08:50:44PM +0100, sime1brt wrote:
> >
> >I can also add in INSTALL.Dos the corrects steps for a full-manual task:
> > tar -xf mulinux-VERSION.tgz
>
> REMEMBER!!! DOS doesn't supports long file names!!!!!

Ops! You are right. For this, I wrote

"rename mulinux*.tgz mu.tgz"
in install.bat.
-M-

-- 
Mi sarebbe piaciuto concludere con un'affermazione positiva, ma
non me ne vengono in mente. Vanno bene due negative?
						-- Woody Allen

Next message: Michele Andreoli: "[mu ANNOUNCE] Release 3.2"
Previous message: Andrea Manzini: "Re: [mu TECH] Umssync troubble!"
In reply to: sime1brt: "Re: [mu TECH] No real need for DOS installation proggy !"
Next in thread: Michele Andreoli: "Re: DOS installation proggy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:11 CET