From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Sep 1 10:37:34 2001 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 10:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.08) with SMTP id f81HbWn21284 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 10:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Sep 01 10:37:31 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.01/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f81HbVP05572; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 10:37:31 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f81Hb6E25294; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 10:37:06 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f81HTD032246 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 10:29:15 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f81HTAq13719 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 10:29:10 -0700 Received: FROM mail.nerdherd.net BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Sat Sep 01 10:29:10 2001 -0700 Received: from aj.nerdherd.net (aj.nerdherd.net [207.174.130.53]) by mail.nerdherd.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B817272F for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 11:29:05 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 11:29:05 -0600 (MDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Ian Hall-Beyer To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Forwarding messages? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Is there an option to tell pine to NEVER forward messages as an attachment? Also, whenever a message is forwarded, it forwards message HTML rendered as text, and strips out the HTML - can this be disabled somehow? Sending messages to spamcop with the HTML intact is necessary. -Ian -- If Java had true garbage collection, most programs would delete themselves upon execution. --Eric Jorgensen -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Sep 2 14:28:23 2001 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 2 Sep 2001 14:28:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.08) with SMTP id f82LSLn14049 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2001 14:28:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Sep 02 14:28:19 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.01/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f82LSIB12423; Sun, 2 Sep 2001 14:28:18 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f82LRhp33046; Sun, 2 Sep 2001 14:27:44 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f82LPV041766 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2001 14:25:31 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f82LPVq17366 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2001 14:25:31 -0700 Received: FROM mail2.panix.com BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Sun Sep 02 14:25:30 2001 -0700 Received: from panix1.panix.com (panix1.panix.com [166.84.1.1]) by mail2.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D098EB9 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2001 17:25:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by panix1.panix.com (8.11.6/8.8.8/PanixN1.0) with ESMTP id f82LPU309894 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2001 17:25:30 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 17:25:29 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: nuk To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: forcing pine to update .newsrc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: X-Authentication-Warning: panix1.panix.com: nuk owned process doing -bs X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Is it possible to force pine to update the .newsrc file manually, other than exiting and restarting pine? I run pine in screen on a shell provider, and periodically screen gets killed off, and if the .newsrc hasnt been updated recently, well the next time I go to read news there is a whole buttload of new messages :( In slrn I have gotten in the habit of pressing 'x' to force a write to the .newsrc so that it is always updated before I disconnect from a screen session. Anything similar in pine? TIA, nuk -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Sep 3 20:07:52 2001 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 20:07:52 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8437on24891 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 20:07:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 03 20:07:49 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.01/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8437mP03847; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 20:07:48 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f84371p26254; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 20:07:01 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8434j023686 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 20:04:46 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8434j708499 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 20:04:45 -0700 Received: FROM mini.digitalplace.org BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 03 20:04:44 2001 -0700 Received: from zeus (zeus [192.168.0.51] (may be forged)) by mini.digitalplace.org (8.12.0.Beta7/8.11.5) with ESMTP id f8434dFv023019 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 23:04:40 -0400 Message-Id: <002801c134ee$5e4efc20$3300a8c0@zeus> Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 23:04:52 -0400 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Administrator" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine & Cyrus IMAP MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I am running a Cyrus IMAP Server and am attempting to run Pine with this configuration. My mail is stored in /var/spool/imap/user/NAME. The permissions on this directory structure are owned by cyrus, and the group is root, but root has no permissions on the directory structure. I am successfully using Microsoft Outlook, and a Webmail client to connect to read my mail, but I would also like to be able to read my mail using pine. It is faithful, and fast. I was unable to connect to the imap server until I tried as root. Then I was able to connect to any account by using the username and password. Is there a way to configure normal users to read mail. Also when I did connect as root to the IMAP server every time I wanted to change a directory it would ask for my password again. Is there a way to configure pine so that my password does not need to be entered in order to perform every command. I am running a Debian box and have download the precompiled pine bin from the ftp server. Thank you for all your help and time. Michael Weber -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Sep 4 12:12:25 2001 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:12:24 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.08) with SMTP id f84JCNn08669 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:12:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 04 12:12:21 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.01/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f84JCLP29105; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:12:21 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f84JBaE30142; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:11:37 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f84J9k0122164 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:09:46 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f84J9jn06681 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:09:46 -0700 Received: FROM euler.math.washington.edu BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 04 12:09:45 2001 -0700 Received: from goedel3.math.washington.edu (goedel3.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.12]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f84J9iP302807; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:09:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:09:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: forcing pine to update .newsrc In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: nuk X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** nuk (nuk@panix.com) wrote on Sep 2, 2001: :) Is it possible to force pine to update the .newsrc file manually, :) other than exiting and restarting pine? The .newsrc file gets updated when you close the newsgroup that were reading. I haven't found any other way to do this. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Sep 4 17:10:55 2001 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 17:10:54 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.08) with SMTP id f850Arn31463 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 17:10:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 04 17:10:51 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.01/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f850ApP08011; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 17:10:51 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f85078H29192; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 17:07:08 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8504k083592 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 17:04:46 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8504kq24720 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 17:04:46 -0700 Received: FROM mail3.panix.com BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 04 17:04:46 2001 -0700 Received: from panix1.panix.com (panix1.panix.com [166.84.1.1]) by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6282C981B7; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 20:04:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by panix1.panix.com (8.11.6/8.8.8/PanixN1.0) with ESMTP id f8504jQ25260; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 20:04:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 20:04:45 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: nuk To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: forcing pine to update .newsrc In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Eduardo Chappa X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: panix1.panix.com: nuk owned process doing -bs X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > *** nuk (nuk@panix.com) wrote on Sep 2, 2001: > > :) Is it possible to force pine to update the .newsrc file manually, > :) other than exiting and restarting pine? > > The .newsrc file gets updated when you close the newsgroup that were > reading. I haven't found any other way to do this. > > Well, what I am running into is that if I use slrn for a while, w/o updating the .newsrc by forcing a manual update w/ 'x', if I get dropped and restart slrn, it shows many, many messages as unread, basically all the way back to the last time I either exited slrn or saved the .newsrc. Understandable. Annoying, but understandable. Now toss pine into the mix. I can read messages all day long in slrn, go to pine for a couple of days, and then go back to slrn (don't ask why, I just do at times ;P ) Now, when I open up slrn, all the news messages show as unread all the way back to the last time I used slrn. Pine didn't make a dent on my .newsrc. That's just weird. nuk From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Sep 4 18:03:00 2001 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 18:03:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8512xn16909 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 18:02:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 04 18:02:58 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.01/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8512vB20424; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 18:02:57 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f850xqE18636; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 17:59:52 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f850xG051410 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 17:59:16 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f850xG712957 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 17:59:16 -0700 Received: FROM vax.hanford.org BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 04 17:59:16 2001 -0700 Received: (qmail 3777 invoked by uid 1828); 5 Sep 2001 00:59:15 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 17:59:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: pine crash MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN 1) I go to a URL through pine, which launches links, which works 2) I quit links -> pine crashes I just checked my configuration, the url viewer is simply the full path to links. Date/Time: 2001-09-04 17:57:37 -0700 OS Version: 10.1 (Build xxxx) Command: pine PID: 779 Exception: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (0x0001) Codes: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE (0x0002) at 0x00000000 Thread 0: #0 0x00000000 in 0x0 #1 0x7000f81c in _sigtramp #2 0x70006af0 in nanosleep #3 0x7000be90 in closedir PPC Thread State: srr0: 0x00000000 srr1: 0x4000d030 vrsave: 0x00000000 xer: 0x00000020 lr: 0x7000f81c ctr: 0x00000000 mq: 0x00000000 r0: 0x00000000 r1: 0xbfffe110 r2: 0x8000053d r3: 0x00000014 r4: 0x00000000 r5: 0xbfffe398 r6: 0x00000000 r7: 0xbfffe4c8 r8: 0x00000000 r9: 0x00000001 r10: 0x00000000 r11: 0x80003414 r12: 0x00000000 r13: 0x00000000 r14: 0x00fff89c r15: 0x00000001 r16: 0x00000001 r17: 0x00000000 r18: 0x00000003 r19: 0x00000028 r20: 0x00000001 r21: 0xbfffef60 r22: 0x0004a010 r23: 0x00000003 r24: 0x0005b961 r25: 0x00000000 r26: 0x70004b64 r27: 0x70004b94 r28: 0x0005dca0 r29: 0x0004a1a0 r30: 0x700037d4 r31: 0x70003a64 ********** mattack@area.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Sep 5 11:01:16 2001 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f85I1Di17332 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:01:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 05 11:01:12 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f85I1BA13451; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:01:11 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f85Hxrp17344; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 10:59:53 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f85HeM0119372 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 10:40:23 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f85HeM716184 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 10:40:22 -0700 Received: FROM vax.hanford.org BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 05 10:40:06 2001 -0700 Received: (qmail 7488 invoked by uid 1828); 5 Sep 2001 17:40:05 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 10:40:05 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PINE-INFO digest 1163 In-Reply-To: <200109050707.f8577wX29776@list3.u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 5 Sep 2001 pine-info@u.washington.edu wrote: >1) I go to a URL through pine, which launches links, which works >2) I quit links >-> pine crashes btw this crash I posted about is completely reproducible. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Sep 6 11:55:42 2001 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 11:55:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f86Itei19310 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 11:55:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 06 11:55:39 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f86ItcW12166; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 11:55:38 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f86IsvH27332; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 11:54:58 -0700 Received: from mxu102.u.washington.edu (mxu102.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f86Ijt055174 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 11:45:55 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by mxu102.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f86IjtE09155 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 11:45:55 -0700 Received: FROM vax.hanford.org BY mxu2.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 06 11:45:54 2001 -0700 Received: (qmail 2441 invoked by uid 1828); 6 Sep 2001 18:45:53 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 11:45:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Faster way to get back to INBOX? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Ok, I'm lazy. After I go look at another mail folder, I want to go back to my INBOX.. Since I have a bunch of mail folders, it always seems tedious to arrow back to my INBOX (though I admit it doesn't feel particularly tedious to arrow to the other mailbox in the first place). Basically, since INBOX is "special", is there a way to get back to INBOX faster? (i.e. 1 keypress?) and/or would this be a good thing to do? I guess it would have to be a preference, since pine is usually (always?) not case-sensitive, but as something the geek user has to turn specifically ON, I would suggest "I" to mean "go back to Index for INBOX". and 'i' would still go to the index of the current folder. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Sep 6 12:02:16 2001 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:02:15 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f86J2Ei07053 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:02:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 06 12:02:12 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f86J2BW12545; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:02:12 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f86J1uH27380; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:01:56 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f86J0L032194 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:00:21 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f86J0Lx07811 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:00:21 -0700 Received: FROM euler.math.washington.edu BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 06 12:00:20 2001 -0700 Received: from goedel3.math.washington.edu (goedel3.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.12]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f86J0GP467679; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:00:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:00:16 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Faster way to get back to INBOX? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Matt Ackeret X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Matt Ackeret (mattack@area.com) wrote in the pine-info list today: :) After I go look at another mail folder, I want to go back to my INBOX.. What I do, is to define in my configuration: goto-default-rule = (*) inbox-or-folder-in-recent-collection Anytime I need to go to my INBOX I press "g RETURN", and if I need to go back to the place I was before I do the same again. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Sep 6 13:59:15 2001 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:59:15 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f86KxDi26524 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:59:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 06 13:59:12 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f86KxCA29287; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:59:12 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f86KvKH25232; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:57:20 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f86KuQ051128 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:56:27 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f86KuQx24639 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:56:26 -0700 Received: FROM vax.hanford.org BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 06 13:56:25 2001 -0700 Received: (qmail 20414 invoked by uid 1828); 6 Sep 2001 20:56:24 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:56:24 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Faster way to get back to INBOX? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Eduardo Chappa X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Eduardo Chappa wrote: >*** Matt Ackeret (mattack@area.com) wrote in the pine-info list today: > >:) After I go look at another mail folder, I want to go back to my INBOX.. > >What I do, is to define in my configuration: > >goto-default-rule = > (*) inbox-or-folder-in-recent-collection > >Anytime I need to go to my INBOX I press "g RETURN", and if I need to go >back to the place I was before I do the same again. woohoo.. I didn't even know about this.. (*) inbox-or-folder-in-first-collection ( ) first-collection-with-inbox-default These two seem to work for me (in a VERY brief test). i.e. "g" goes to INBOX. ( ) inbox-or-folder-in-recent-collection ok, I must be confused -- I could swear the first time I tried this, when I was at the main menu, g went back to suspected_spam (and it was the one listed in the brackets). So I guess I oughta go read the help text for these options. Basically -- thanks for the info about the goto command. Way better than the old "mlarrows" method. I still think an optional one-key-to-inbox (or maybe even a user-specified folder) might be nice, but that is me *ADMITTEDLY* being a whiner. Two keys is great! From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Sep 7 00:20:30 2001 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 00:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f877KSi31523 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 00:20:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 07 00:20:27 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f877KQW02223; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 00:20:26 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f877Jip30826; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 00:19:44 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f877Da020284 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 00:13:36 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f877Da728701 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 00:13:36 -0700 Received: FROM romeo.skybert.no BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 07 00:13:35 2001 -0700 Received: (from root@localhost) by romeo.skybert.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA32745 for pine-info@u.washington.edu.VIRCHECK; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 09:13:34 +0200 Received: from romeo.skybert.no (erik@romeo.skybert.no [213.184.194.22]) by romeo.skybert.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA32708 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 09:13:32 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 09:13:32 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Erik_Inge_Bols=F8?= To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: "=?iso8859-1?Q?" in suggested attachment filenames MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Sender: X-To: X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.0-pre6-clm-rl-8 (http://amavis.org/) X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.0-pre6-clm-rl-8 (http://amavis.org/) X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by romeo.skybert.no id JAA32745 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Greetings. I'm wondering, is there any patch for pine that fixes the problem that iso-8859-1 quoted strings as filenames are not decoded? Included below is a message from the Evolution mailing list earlier this year, addressing this problem. > Note that RFC 2183 does not require (ie, it doesn't say SHOULD or MUST) > that the filename attribute be used as the basis for the name of the > saved file. Oops, what I meant to say was: 2183 doesn't require that the filename attribute be used as the saved filename, but recommends that it be used as the BASIS for the filename and that the filename be changed according to avoid file name conflicts, enusre legal filename on local filesystem, etc. RFC 2184 specifies how to deal with long filename parameters and filenames containing non-ascii characters, but Evolution currently neither recognizes nor produces RFC2184-compliant MIME-headers. Here's how different mailers set the filename attribute: 1. Elm and Evolution: filename=3D"=E1=F3 =E9=ED=F1.txt" 2. Mozilla: filename=3D"=3D?iso-8859-1?Q?=3DE1=3DF3=3D20=3DE9=3DED=3DF1=3D2Etxt?=3D" 3. Outlook filename=3D"=3D?iso-8859-1?B?4fMg6e3xLnR4dA=3D=3D?=3D" 4. Pine filename*=3D"X-UNKNOWN''%E1%F3 %E9%ED%F1.txt" 1 is illegal since it contains 8-bit characters, which can't occur in a quoted-text string. 2 and 3 are legal, but don't have the right semantics: if an attribute value starts and ends with "'s, it's a quoted-string, and so "=3D?iso-8859-1?B?4fMg6e3xLnR4dA=3D=3D?=3D" refers to the string =3D?iso-8859-1?B?4fMg6e3xLnR4dA=3D=3D?=3D and not the intended =E1=F3 =E9=ED=F1.txt 4 is legal, but not RFC 2184-compliant, since extended-value isn't supposed to have any quotes around it, or spaces within. The correct way would be: filename*=3DX-UNKNOWN''%E1%F3%20%E9%ED%F1.txt Evolution should generate the correct version, and accept the incorrect versions (ie, interpret all versions above as "=E1=F3 =E9=ED=F1.txt") -Richard --=20 Erik I. Bols=F8, Triangel Maritech Software AS Tlf: 712 41 694 Mobil: 915 79 512 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Sep 7 05:14:32 2001 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 05:14:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f87CEUi07951 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 05:14:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 07 05:14:26 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f87CEOW08571; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 05:14:24 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f87CDJp32304; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 05:13:19 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f87C9g026774 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 05:09:42 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f87C9fx04387 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 05:09:41 -0700 Received: FROM proxy4.ba.best.com BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 07 05:09:41 2001 -0700 Received: from localhost (root@shell13.ba.best.com [206.184.139.144]) by proxy4.ba.best.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/best.out) with ESMTP id FAA13984; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 05:08:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 13:11:01 +0100 (BST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: folder-sort-rule suggestion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Technical Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: ii@akket.pair.com X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN One of the most frequent Pine questions is people wanting to know how to determine which mailboxes contain new messages. I know that the Pine team is planning to implement this but here is an idea that seems like it would be easy to implement and would make it easier to figure out which mailboxes contain new messages and be a useful feature to have even after the real feature is implemented. Currently the folder-sort-rule configuration looks like this: folder-sort-rule = Set Rule Values --- ---------------------- ( ) alphabetical ( ) alpha-with-dirs-last ( ) alpha-with-dirs-first I propose adding options based on date, e.g.: folder-sort-rule = Set Rule Values --- ---------------------- ( ) alphabetical ( ) alpha-with-dirs-last ( ) alpha-with-dirs-first ( ) date-with-dirs-last ( ) date-with-dirs-first (*) reverse-date-with-dirs-last ( ) reverse-date-with-dirs-first And then if the option I've * above were chosen, the mailboxes that received messages most recently would be listed first and I could step through these looking for new messages. If the date were also listed on the Folder List screen, that would be an even better clue! Thanks for considering this! Nancy ^x -- ii Main Pine Page: Nancy McGough Infinite Ink =-- Sent via Pine: IMAP, NNTP & ESMTP for Unix/Win/Mac OS X --= -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Sep 7 06:41:33 2001 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 06:41:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f87DfUi16576 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 06:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 07 06:41:29 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f87DfSA23286; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 06:41:28 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f87Df7p16332; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 06:41:07 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f87DbR045234 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 06:37:27 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f87DbRx19836 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 06:37:27 -0700 Received: FROM proxy2.ba.best.com BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 07 06:37:27 2001 -0700 Received: from localhost (root@shell13.ba.best.com [206.184.139.144]) by proxy2.ba.best.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/best.out) with ESMTP id GAA24370; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 06:36:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 14:38:33 +0100 (BST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine mailbox formats & Mailbag Assistant MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Technical Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: nancy@imap.iecc.com X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Dear Pinesters, There is a Windows tool called Mailbag Assistant, which sounds very cool and I think it would be a nice companion to Pine for users who archive their messages on an MS Windows machine. You can find out about it here: http://www.fookes.com/mailbag/ I downloaded it and tried to use it on my mailbox archives but I couldn't get it to work with them. Below is an excerpt of an exchange I had with Eric Fookes, the author of MBA, and then below that is my questions to you all... > From: Eric G.V. Fookes > Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 21:22:02 +0200 > To: "mailbag@yahoogroups.com" > > Hi Nance, > > >When I learned about NoteTab and MailBag, I was very enthusiastic > >and put a links to both of them on my Pine page in the "Companion > >Programs" section. > > Oh great! Thanks :) > > >Since I can't use MailBag on Pine mailboxes, > >I've commented it out for now but as soon as MBA supports Unix > >mbox format mailboxes, I'll add it back. > > I'll have to do something about that. It won't be for version > 2.6, but maybe the following one. Perhaps you could send me a > small sample Pine mailbox that contains a mix of messages (such > as different priority values, small attachments)? If you can do > that for me, .zip the file and send it to me as an attachment > to . > > [...] > > Regards, > Eric G.V. Fookes > Author of NoteTab, Mailbag Assistant, and Album Express > http://www.fookes.com/ and http://www.notetab.com/ And now my questions to you all. On my Power Pine page in this section http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/pc/#ftp I say: The following folder formats work in both PC-Pine and Unix Pine: * unix mbox (default format for Unix Pine) * c-client MBX (default format for PC-Pine) * mtx * tenex But there is another format that PC-Pine understands and that is unix mbox but using DOS end-of-line (CRLF) instead of Unix end-of-line (LF). Q1] Does this CRLF unix mbox format have a name? Q2] Can Unix Pine also use it? Other questions: Q3] Are there any standard filename extensions used for different mailbox formats? I've started using .cmbx for c-client MBX format and .unix for unix mbox format (with LF for end-of-line) but I'm wondering if there are any standard extensions that people are using for these and other folder formats that Pine understands, e.g., the CRLF unix mbox format. It seems to me that .mbx should be avoided because it is used by too many different mail clients to mean too many different formats and thus is ambiguous. Q4] This is actually a request to the Pine developers: PLEASE please please give PC-Pine users an option to have their mailboxes default to be created in Unix mbox format rather than c-client MBX format. For those of us who live in both the Unix and Windows world and use lots of Unix-based tools, Unix mbox format is the best because it is understood by all kinds of tools. Q5] If anyone, e.g., the Pine developers, has sample mailboxes that contain a "mix of messages (such as different priority values, small attachments)" that I can send to Eric, please let me know. Thanks! Nancy -- ii Main Pine Page: Nancy McGough Infinite Ink --= Sent via Pine: IMAP, NNTP & ESMTP for Unix/Win/Mac OS X =-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Sep 8 01:45:51 2001 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 01:45:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f888hli27020 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 01:44:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Sep 08 01:42:05 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f888g4W11183; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 01:42:04 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f888fZH13138; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 01:41:35 -0700 Received: from mxu102.u.washington.edu (mxu102.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f888db023714 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 01:39:37 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by mxu102.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f888dbE01404 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 01:39:37 -0700 Received: FROM proxy2.ba.best.com BY mxu2.u.washington.edu ; Sat Sep 08 01:39:36 2001 -0700 Received: from localhost (root@shell13.ba.best.com [206.184.139.144]) by proxy2.ba.best.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/best.out) with ESMTP id BAA25358; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 01:37:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 09:40:28 +0100 (BST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine mailbox formats & Mailbag Assistant In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Technical Discussion Forum X-Cc: "Cornelius C. Noack" X-X-Sender: nancy@imap.iecc.com X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On 7 Sep 2001 Cornelius C. Noack (noack@physik.uni-bremen.de) wrote: > How can I (manually at present, I realize) set my folder > formats in PC-Pine to annything but the default MBX ? To use traditional Unix mbox format, prepend #driver.unix to the file specification (server, path, and/or name). I discuss details (and problems) about this here: > > Q4] This is actually a request to the Pine developers: PLEASE > > please please give PC-Pine users an option to have their > > mailboxes default to be created in Unix mbox format > > > I strongly support this request, for precisely the reasons you give! Another reason is political: Making it so difficult to use a mailbox format other than c-client MBX makes PC-Pine almost as bad as the evil empire's Outlook and Outlook Express, which also lock people into a proprietary mailbox format. One of the reasons I use and promote Pine is because it hasn't done this kind of thing in the past. Nancy ^x -- ii Main Pine Page: Nancy McGough Infinite Ink --= Sent via Pine: IMAP, NNTP & ESMTP for Unix/Win/Mac OS X =-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Sep 10 21:33:30 2001 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 21:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8B4XSi20974 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 21:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 10 21:33:27 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8B4XQW02936; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 21:33:26 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8B4WOE32526; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 21:32:24 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8B4UE044024 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 21:30:14 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8B4UE706619 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 21:30:14 -0700 Received: FROM laplace.sag.gwu.edu BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 10 21:30:13 2001 -0700 Received: from maumee. (fwint.gwu.edu [192.168.61.160]) by laplace.sag.gwu.edu (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.4.0.2000.05.17.04.13.p6) with SMTP id <0GJH002KDDU31R@laplace.sag.gwu.edu> for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 00:30:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 00:30:02 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jeff Baxter To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Turning off local address lookup.. MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi all - I've got an LDAP directory defined in Pine so that it implicitly fills in any non-fully-formed addresses with the full name. That works fine. I would like to suppress Pine's check against the local /etc/passwd file or any other local source, and just have it check the .addressbook file and then go the LDAP directory. Is there any way to suppress this check of the local information? Jeff Baxter Information Systems and Services George Washington University -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Sep 10 22:38:29 2001 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 22:38:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8B5cRi03614 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 22:38:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 10 22:38:26 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8B5cPA18936; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 22:38:25 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8B5atX29390; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 22:36:55 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8B5WP0111088 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 22:32:25 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8B5WPx25780 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 22:32:25 -0700 Received: FROM euler.math.washington.edu BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 10 22:32:24 2001 -0700 Received: from goedel1.math.washington.edu (goedel1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.10]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8B5WNP240655; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 22:32:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 22:32:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Turning off local address lookup.. In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Jeff Baxter X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Jeff Baxter (jbaxter@gwu.edu) wrote in the pine-info list on Sep 11, 2001: :) I would like to suppress Pine's check against the local /etc/passwd file :) or any other local source, and just have it check the .addressbook file :) and then go the LDAP directory. Is there any way to suppress this check of :) the local information? Dear Jeff, You will have to enable: [X] quell-user-lookup-in-passwd-file in the configuration screen. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Sep 11 03:35:31 2001 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 03:35:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8BAZTi12947 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 03:35:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 11 03:35:28 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8BAZRA24934; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 03:35:27 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8BAXWH20814; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 03:33:32 -0700 Received: from mxu102.u.washington.edu (mxu102.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8BAVh072382 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 03:31:43 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by mxu102.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8BAVgE08606 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 03:31:42 -0700 Received: FROM imag.imag.fr BY mxu2.u.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 11 03:31:41 2001 -0700 Received: from ormelune.imag.fr (ormelune.imag.fr [129.88.43.35]) by imag.imag.fr (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8BAVdW07460 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 12:31:40 +0200 (MEST) Received: from olan.imag.fr (olan [129.88.43.51]) by ormelune.imag.fr (8.9.1b+Sun/jtpda-5.3.3) with ESMTP id MAA04369 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 12:31:39 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 12:31:39 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nicolas Kowalski To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: pruned-folders MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello. I am using Pine with UW-imap server. The incoming mail is filtered with procmail, which delivers it to IMAP folders through dmail. Only one collection is defined, which is my IMAP account (server "ormelune"). As I am subscribed to several mailing-lists, I want to use the pruned-folders feature. Here is what is defined : pruned-folders={ormelune}verimag/root, {ormelune}list/debian-french, {ormelune}list/debian-security, {ormelune}list/debian-user, ... However, when I start pine, it tells me "Ignoring pruned folders outside of defaut collection". I understand it will not move old folders each month. So how can I achieve this behaviour ? Thanks, Nicolas. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Sep 11 17:37:59 2001 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 17:37:58 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8C0bvi07725 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 17:37:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 11 17:37:55 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8C0btW03087; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 17:37:55 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8C0atp32454; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 17:36:55 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8C0ZN017802 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 17:35:23 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8C0ZN709501 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 17:35:23 -0700 Received: FROM web14205.mail.yahoo.com BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 11 17:35:22 2001 -0700 Received: from [205.219.204.23] by web14205.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 17:35:22 PDT Message-Id: <20010912003522.10546.qmail@web14205.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 17:35:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eric Wu To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: How to send mail in Unix command line directly. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi All, I am new in this group. Could someone tell me how to use Pine to send email from Unix command line directly ? Thanks in advance! Eric __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Sep 11 17:48:20 2001 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 17:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8C0mHi20094 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 17:48:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 11 17:48:16 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8C0mGW03316; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 17:48:16 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8C0lPE18528; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 17:47:25 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8C0kY044994 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 17:46:34 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8C0kX711592 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 17:46:34 -0700 Received: FROM corten2.billschoolcraft.com BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 11 17:46:33 2001 -0700 Received: from corten8.billschoolcraft.com ([192.168.7.8]) by corten2.billschoolcraft.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 13YeCj-0002B0-00; Mon, 11 Sep 2000 17:45:41 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 17:42:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bill Schoolcraft To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: How to send mail in Unix command line directly. In-Reply-To: <20010912003522.10546.qmail@web14205.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Eric Wu X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN At Tue, 11 Sep 2001 it looks like Eric Wu composed: eric_z->Hi All, eric_z-> eric_z->I am new in this group. eric_z->Could someone tell me how to use Pine to send eric_z->email from Unix command line directly ? eric_z->Thanks in advance! eric_z-> Well it wouldn't be pine that is used but providing your MTA is working ok lets send yourself a file off the Unix machine your on. (begin command) mail -s "Mail Test for Eric" eric_zwu@yahoo.com < /etc/passwd (end of command) -- Bill Schoolcraft PO Box 210076 San Francisco, CA 94121 http://ForwardSlashUnix.com "UNIX, A Way of Life." From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Sep 12 03:31:20 2001 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 03:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8CAUpi17908 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 03:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 12 03:27:16 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8CARFA31253; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 03:27:15 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8CAQRE25318; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 03:26:27 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8CALe081856 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 03:21:40 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8CALd703679 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 03:21:40 -0700 Received: FROM aslan.narnia.pp.se BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 12 03:21:39 2001 -0700 Received: from localhost (dufberg@localhost) by aslan.narnia.pp.se (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8CALY348266; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 12:21:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dufberg@narnia.pp.se) Message-Id: <20010912121824.J48207-100000@aslan.narnia.pp.se> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 12:21:34 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mats Dufberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: How to send mail in Unix command line directly. In-Reply-To: <20010912003522.10546.qmail@web14205.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-To: Eric Wu X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Eric Wu wrote: > Could someone tell me how to use Pine to send > email from Unix command line directly ? It depends on what you mean. You could start pine with recepient address directly on the command line, and even give a file to attach. Then you enter the mail editing mode. When you have sent the mail, you'll be back on the command line: pine -attach /etc/passwd eric_zwu@yahoo.com Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg dufberg@narnia.pp.se Bl=E5arvsgr=E4nd 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 V=E4llingby, Sweden +46-709-17 48 42 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:38:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8CCcai07260 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:38:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 12 05:38:34 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8CCcYA01751; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:38:34 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8CCbBE25204; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:37:11 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8CCXH071854 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:33:17 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8CCXHv00525 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:33:17 -0700 Received: FROM corten2.billschoolcraft.com BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 12 05:33:16 2001 -0700 Received: from corten8.billschoolcraft.com ([192.168.7.8]) by corten2.billschoolcraft.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 13YpEf-0002f0-00 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2000 05:32:25 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:28:52 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bill Schoolcraft To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: How to send mail in Unix command line directly. In-Reply-To: <20010912121824.J48207-100000@aslan.narnia.pp.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN At Wed, 12 Sep 2001 it looks like Mats Dufberg composed: dufber->On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Eric Wu wrote: dufber-> dufber->> Could someone tell me how to use Pine to send dufber->> email from Unix command line directly ? dufber-> dufber->It depends on what you mean. You could start pine with recepient address dufber->directly on the command line, and even give a file to attach. Then you dufber->enter the mail editing mode. When you have sent the mail, you'll be back dufber->on the command line: dufber-> dufber->pine -attach /etc/passwd eric_zwu@yahoo.com dufber-> dufber-> Hmmm, didn't know that. Could you add a "subject" to that pine command ? -- Bill Schoolcraft PO Box 210076 San Francisco, CA 94121 http://ForwardSlashUnix.com "UNIX, A Way of Life." From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:46:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8CCkZi25952 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:46:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 12 05:46:33 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8CCkXA01922; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:46:33 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8CCkKE33244; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:46:20 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8CCfh081852 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:41:43 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8CCfgv04798 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:41:43 -0700 Received: FROM mail.sonytel.be BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 12 05:41:41 2001 -0700 Received: from cactus.sonytel.be (cactus.sonytel.be [10.34.112.3]) by mail.sonytel.be (8.9.0/8.8.6) with ESMTP id OAA14555 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:41:37 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:41:39 +0200 (MEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Murphy To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: How to send mail in Unix command line directly. (fwd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN >On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Eric Wu wrote: > >> Could someone tell me how to use Pine to send >> email from Unix command line directly ? > >It depends on what you mean. You could start pine with recepient address >directly on the command line, and even give a file to attach. Then you >enter the mail editing mode. When you have sent the mail, you'll be back >on the command line: > >pine -attach /etc/passwd eric_zwu@yahoo.com I think the edit mode is the problem for him. I'm tryed to do this with pine, but I couldn't force it to do not enter in the edit mode. Finally for the sending e-mails from the command line I choose the "mutt" which is good for this task. For example: cat text_body_file.txt | mutt -s "Subject" -a "attachment_file.zip" -x eric_zwu@yahoo.com For the normal reading I'm still using the PINE, which is better for this. Regards, Murphy -- __ __ || || -++- -++- -------------------------------------------------------- ||\ /|| piotr@sonycom.com murph@free.polbox.pl || || || || Everything is possible - this is only a question of time \/ \/ -------------------------------------------------------- 564 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 06:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8CD4Ri21443 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 06:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 12 06:04:26 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8CD4PA02379; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 06:04:25 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8CD4CX16828; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 06:04:13 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8CCxg056228 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:59:43 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8CCxg727166 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:59:42 -0700 Received: FROM aslan.narnia.pp.se BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 12 05:59:41 2001 -0700 Received: from localhost (dufberg@localhost) by aslan.narnia.pp.se (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8CCxcM48405; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:59:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dufberg@narnia.pp.se) Message-Id: <20010912145628.Q48207-100000@aslan.narnia.pp.se> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:59:38 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mats Dufberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: How to send mail in Unix command line directly. In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-To: Bill Schoolcraft X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Bill Schoolcraft wrote: > Hmmm, didn't know that. Could you add a "subject" to that pine > command ? Yes, with the more general URL switch. Try pine -url 'mailto:bill@wiliweld.com?subject=3DMy%20subject&body=3DIn%20my%20body' on one line. The quotes are needed to prevent the shell from interpreting "&" as a put-in-background command. Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg dufberg@narnia.pp.se Bl=E5arvsgr=E4nd 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 V=E4llingby, Sweden +46-709-17 48 42 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 06:56:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8CDuKi20049 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 06:56:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 12 06:56:17 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8CDuGW20427; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 06:56:16 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8CDtLE21228; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 06:55:22 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8CDpl0122442 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 06:51:47 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8CDpkx02861 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 06:51:47 -0700 Received: FROM mail.eecis.udel.edu BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 12 06:51:46 2001 -0700 Received: from louie.udel.edu by mail.eecis.udel.edu id aa03770; 12 Sep 2001 09:51 EDT Message-Id: Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 09:51:33 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: kapil khosla To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Undelete Message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, I deleted a message from my personal folder and I want to know if there is any way I can retreive it, Thanks, Kh -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 08:26:38 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8CFQYi13314 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 08:26:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 12 08:26:33 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8CFQXA06068; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 08:26:33 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8CFQ8p09928; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 08:26:08 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8CFGh042066 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 08:16:43 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8CFGhx27975 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 08:16:43 -0700 Received: FROM euler.math.washington.edu BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 12 08:16:42 2001 -0700 Received: from goedel3.math.washington.edu (goedel3.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.12]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8CFGUP351853; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 08:16:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 08:16:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: How to send mail in Unix command line directly. (fwd) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Murphy X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Murphy (murphy@pulstar.albedo.art.pl) wrote in the pine-info list today: :) I think the edit mode is the problem for him. I'm tryed to do this :) with pine, but I couldn't force it to do not enter in the edit mode. If you do not want to enter the edit mode, try a patch that I wrote which you can get from my web page (address below). :) Finally for the sending e-mails from the command line I choose the :) "mutt" which is good for this task. For example: :) :) cat text_body_file.txt | mutt -s "Subject" -a "attachment_file.zip" -x eric_zwu@yahoo.com Mutt is still known to have some bugs when sending mail from the command line and corrupting attachments (the last known case is a pdf file), so even some participants in comp.mail.mutt do not recommend to do this and they recommned to use mpack. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 10:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8CHrGi22014 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 10:53:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 12 10:53:13 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8CHr9W28840; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 10:53:09 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8CHkcX19776; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 10:46:38 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8CHjS0121806 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 10:45:28 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8CHjSv30061 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 10:45:28 -0700 Received: FROM vax.hanford.org BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 12 10:45:27 2001 -0700 Received: (qmail 24856 invoked by uid 1828); 12 Sep 2001 17:45:26 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 10:45:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: send mail with pine from command line/other apps In-Reply-To: <200109120711.f8C7B1H39152@list1.u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 12 Sep 2001 pine-info@u.washington.edu wrote: >From: Bill Schoolcraft >At Tue, 11 Sep 2001 it looks like Eric Wu composed: >eric_z->Could someone tell me how to use Pine to send >eric_z->email from Unix command line directly ? >eric_z->Thanks in advance! >Well it wouldn't be pine that is used but providing your MTA is >working ok lets send yourself a file off the Unix machine your on. >(begin command) >mail -s "Mail Test for Eric" eric_zwu@yahoo.com < /etc/passwd >(end of command) Well, I sure wish that I could use pine as my mail program that trn and lynx/links use, AND save copies in my sent-mail folder just like mail sent normally from pine. (And since I'm usually running a 'screen' window with pine already on the same session that I want these to happen on, if it switched to that screen session and used that already-existing pine I wouldn't even have to enter my password again.) Yes, I know, I'm dreaming.. But configurability is one thing GUI programs can learn from UNIX programs... and I think *COMPLEX* (user-level) interoperability is one thing UNIX programs can learn from GUI programs. (Of course, pipes, redirection, temp files, etc., are a great form of interoperability too.) -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 03:07:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8DA7Zi28066 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 03:07:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 13 03:07:33 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8DA7WA07440; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 03:07:32 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8DA2JK19368; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 03:02:19 -0700 Received: from mxu102.u.washington.edu (mxu102.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8DA06046320 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 03:00:07 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by mxu102.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8DA05E05666 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 03:00:06 -0700 Received: FROM mail.sonytel.be BY mxu2.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 13 03:00:04 2001 -0700 Received: from cactus.sonytel.be (cactus.sonytel.be [10.34.112.3]) by mail.sonytel.be (8.9.0/8.8.6) with ESMTP id MAA02901 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 12:00:02 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 12:00:04 +0200 (MEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Murphy To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Problem with compilation of patched sources (v4.33, Sun Solaris 2.8) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, I wanted to upgrade my version of pine about some useful patches, but unfortunately I got a error message during compilation like this: > ./build gs5 (cut) Making Pine. make CC=gcc -f makefile.gs5 gcc -g -DDEBUG -DSV4 -DSYSTYPE=\"GSO\" -DMOUSE -c -o mailcmd.o mailcmd.c mailcmd.c: In function `save_prompt': mailcmd.c:2138: `V_SAVE_RULES' undeclared (first use in this function) mailcmd.c:2138: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once mailcmd.c:2138: for each function it appears in.) mailcmd.c: In function `do_broach_folder': mailcmd.c:5747: `V_SORT_RULES' undeclared (first use in this function) mailcmd.c:5777: `V_STARTUP_RULES' undeclared (first use in this function) make: *** [mailcmd.o] Error 1 (cut) I added patches for: curcolor_patch.gz fillpara_patch.gz flags_patch.gz fromheader_patch.gz incoming_patch.gz reply_patch.gz rules_patch.gz And also files: rules_c.gz rules_h.gz What I should change to make this compilation work? Regards, Murphy -- __ __ || || -++- -++- -------------------------------------------------------- ||\ /|| e-mail: murphy@pulstar.albedo.art.pl || || || || Everything is possible - this is only a question of time \/ \/ -------------------------------------------------------- 564 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:43:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8DFhui13093 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:43:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 13 08:43:55 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8DFhsW31011; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:43:54 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8DFgrX19772; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:42:53 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8DFaM070470 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:36:23 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8DFaLv11991 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:36:22 -0700 Received: FROM euler.math.washington.edu BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 13 08:36:20 2001 -0700 Received: from goedel1.math.washington.edu (goedel1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.10]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8DFaGP498348; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Problem with compilation of patched sources (v4.33, Sun Solaris 2.8) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Murphy X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Murphy (murphy@pulstar.albedo.art.pl) wrote in the pine-info list today: :) I wanted to upgrade my version of pine about some useful patches, but :) unfortunately I got a error message during compilation like this: [deleted] The problem must be on the application of the patches. The patches are supposed to be applied on clean source and sometimes the application of two or more patches conflicts and that may make the application of the patch fail and create this kind of problems. I'll give you a patch that will fix your problems. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:56:16 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8DFuEi24866 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:56:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 13 08:56:11 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8DFu6W31409; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:56:06 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8DFnJK28098; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:49:19 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8DFji097662 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:45:44 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8DFjhx09490 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:45:44 -0700 Received: FROM mail.sonytel.be BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 13 08:45:42 2001 -0700 Received: from cactus.sonytel.be (cactus.sonytel.be [10.34.112.3]) by mail.sonytel.be (8.9.0/8.8.6) with ESMTP id RAA21940 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:45:37 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:45:39 +0200 (MEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Murphy To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Problem with compilation of patched sources (v4.33, Sun Solaris 2.8) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Eduardo Chappa wrote: >*** Murphy (murphy@pulstar.albedo.art.pl) wrote in the pine-info list today: > >:) I wanted to upgrade my version of pine about some useful patches, but >:) unfortunately I got a error message during compilation like this: >[deleted] >The problem must be on the application of the patches. The patches are >supposed to be applied on clean source and sometimes the application of >two or more patches conflicts and that may make the application of the >patch fail and create this kind of problems. I'll give you a patch that >will fix your problems. Actually I found the problem during elimination of other patches. The problem occur when I'm trying to add a "rules_path". For this patch there is also needed two files: rules.c rules.h which I copy to the pine4.33/pine directory. But during patching I got error like this: patch -p0 < rules_patch patching file pine4.33/build patching file pine4.33/pine/init.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 209 with fuzz 2 (offset 5 lines). Hunk #2 FAILED at 479. Hunk #3 FAILED at 1509. Hunk #4 succeeded at 2386 (offset 17 lines). 2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file pine4.33/pine/init.c.rej patching file pine4.33/pine/mailcmd.c Hunk #2 succeeded at 115 with fuzz 2. Hunk #3 succeeded at 2121 (offset 139 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 2950 (offset 139 lines). Hunk #7 succeeded at 5193 (offset 148 lines). Hunk #9 succeeded at 5753 with fuzz 2 (offset 159 lines). Hunk #10 FAILED at 5779. Hunk #11 succeeded at 5659 (offset 7 lines). Hunk #12 succeeded at 5829 (offset 159 lines). Hunk #13 FAILED at 5941. Hunk #14 succeeded at 5939 (offset 22 lines). Hunk #15 succeeded at 6504 with fuzz 2 (offset 55 lines). Hunk #16 FAILED at 6538. Hunk #17 FAILED at 6546. 4 out of 17 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file pine4.33/pine/mailcmd.c.rej patching file pine4.33/pine/mailindx.c Hunk #2 succeeded at 575 (offset 32 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 2097 (offset 16 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 2130 (offset 32 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 2135 (offset 16 lines). Hunk #6 succeeded at 2159 (offset 32 lines). Hunk #7 succeeded at 3147 (offset 16 lines). Hunk #8 succeeded at 3482 (offset 67 lines). Hunk #9 succeeded at 3463 (offset 16 lines). Hunk #10 succeeded at 3690 (offset 67 lines). Hunk #11 succeeded at 3656 (offset 16 lines). Hunk #12 succeeded at 5373 (offset 107 lines). Hunk #13 succeeded at 5331 (offset 16 lines). patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.a32 patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.a41 patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.aix patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.aux patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.bs2 patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.bsd patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.bsf patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.bsi patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.bso patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.cvx patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.d-g patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.dpx patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.dyn patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.epx patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.gen patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.gh9 patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.ghp patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.gs4 patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.gs5 patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.gsu patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.gul patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.hpp patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.hpx patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.isc patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.lnx patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.lyn patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.mct patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.mnt patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.msc patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.neb patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.nxt patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.osf patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.pt1 patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.ptx patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.s40 patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.sc5 patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.sco patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.sgi patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.so4 patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.so5 patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.sun patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.sv4 patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.ult patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.uw2 patching file pine4.33/pine/makefile.vul patching file pine4.33/pine/other.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 6731. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file pine4.33/pine/other.c.rej patching file pine4.33/pine/pine.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 256 (offset 6 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 2829 (offset 3 lines). patching file pine4.33/pine/pine.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 439. Hunk #2 FAILED at 660. Hunk #3 succeeded at 926 (offset 19 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 1660 (offset 24 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 1672 (offset 19 lines). Hunk #6 succeeded at 2622 (offset 25 lines). Hunk #7 succeeded at 2661 (offset 19 lines). 2 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file pine4.33/pine/pine.h.rej patching file pine4.33/pine/pine.hlp Hunk #2 succeeded at 11985 (offset 1 line). Hunk #4 succeeded at 12297 (offset 1 line). Hunk #6 succeeded at 14519 (offset 74 lines). Hunk #7 succeeded at 19047 (offset 65 lines). patching file pine4.33/pine/reply.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 302 (offset 3 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 378 with fuzz 2 (offset 20 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 1539 (offset 1 line). Hunk #5 succeeded at 1633 (offset 20 lines). Hunk #6 succeeded at 2655 (offset 88 lines). Hunk #7 succeeded at 2771 (offset 20 lines). Hunk #8 succeeded at 3083 (offset 88 lines). Hunk #9 succeeded at 3030 (offset 20 lines). Hunk #10 succeeded at 3312 (offset 88 lines). patching file pine4.33/pine/send.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 6080 (offset 10 lines). Sombody tryed to patch PINE 4.33 using this patch? Regards, Murphy -- __ __ || || -++- -++- -------------------------------------------------------- ||\ /|| e-mail: murphy@pulstar.albedo.art.pl || || || || Everything is possible - this is only a question of time \/ \/ -------------------------------------------------------- 564 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:36:25 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8DHaNi11184 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:36:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 13 10:36:22 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8DHaMW02909; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:36:22 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8DHYSK21882; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:34:28 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8DHUx095690 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:31:01 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8DHUwx29202 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:30:58 -0700 Received: FROM mail.sonytel.be BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 13 10:30:57 2001 -0700 Received: from cactus.sonytel.be (cactus.sonytel.be [10.34.112.3]) by mail.sonytel.be (8.9.0/8.8.6) with ESMTP id TAA26265 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 19:30:55 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 19:30:57 +0200 (MEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Murphy To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PINE 4.33 and the "fcc-name-rule" for the reply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: NEWS - Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, I discovered that messages which has filed in header "Reply-To" then proper rule is used to storing "Fcc" file according to the settings from address book. The problem is that not every e-mail contain this entry. In this case the default rule for "fcc-name-rule", which is "default-fcc" in my settings, doesn't work like I would like to have. Normally, when the "Reply-To" header is present, the Pine gets the location of "Fcc" from the address book, which is correct. But if there is no "Reply-To" header, the default rule is "saved-mail", which is not like should be. I know, that I can add some rules for replying the e-mails, but it will be better to have other "fcc-name-rule" like "by-address-from-addresbook" (or something like this). The idea is to find the address in the address book, then using this address to get corresponding Fcc location. In this case you can save your outgoing copy into the proper place. I don't know maybe somebody found some solution for this (or some patch which extend the options for the "fcc-name-rule" actions). What you all think about? Regards, Murphy -- __ __ || || -++- -++- -------------------------------------------------------- ||\ /|| e-mail: murphy@pulstar.albedo.art.pl || || || || Everything is possible - this is only a question of time \/ \/ -------------------------------------------------------- 564 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 15:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8DMgxi07231 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 15:42:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 13 15:42:54 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8DMgsW15561; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 15:42:54 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8DMg0X23090; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 15:42:00 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8DMWL0127104 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 15:32:21 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8DMWLx00652 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 15:32:21 -0700 Received: FROM mailman.packetdesign.com BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 13 15:32:20 2001 -0700 Received: from ash.packetdesign.com (ash.packetdesign.com [192.168.0.243]) by mailman.packetdesign.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f8DMW8231165; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 15:32:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from casner@acm.org) Message-Id: <20010913151659.H71365-100000@ash.packetdesign.com> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 15:35:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Stephen Casner To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: text/plain attachments not in base64 encoding In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN After poking around on the WU pine web for a while, I found an explanation of Pine's policy of always using base64 encoding for text/plain attachments. I don't agree with that policy, though. When I attach a US-ASCII file, I'd like it to go as quoted-printable or even as 7-bit so that its contents will still be text searchable in the mail file, as well as not wasting bits. The suggestion from the Pine tech notes is to include the text in the body of the message if you want to avoid base64 encoding, but that is unfriendly to people reading mail over slow lines. One of the great features of IMAP is that you don't have to transfer the attachments. Has anyone made a patch for this? I didn't find one on Eduardo's page. -- Steve -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:24:25 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8E0ONi06508 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:24:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 13 17:24:21 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8E0OLW19593; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:24:21 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8E0NWX26688; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:23:33 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8E0MR066446 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:22:27 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8E0MQv20655 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:22:26 -0700 Received: FROM mail.eecis.udel.edu BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 13 17:22:25 2001 -0700 Received: from louie.udel.edu by mail.eecis.udel.edu id aa14412; 13 Sep 2001 20:22 EDT Message-Id: Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 20:22:17 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: kapil khosla To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Sorting Messages In-Reply-To: <20010913151659.H71365-100000@ash.packetdesign.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, I want to sort my mails in different folders according to a pattern. I have enabled the Incoming - folder list option in my config and made a folder (My Name) IN IT. I want to know that how should I now set a pattern for it. Thanks, Kapil From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8E0VMi04277 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 13 17:30:59 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8E0UwW19782; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:30:59 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8E0U0K15686; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:30:00 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8E0SF003540 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:28:16 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8E0SEv23959 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:28:14 -0700 Received: FROM euler.math.washington.edu BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 13 17:28:14 2001 -0700 Received: from goedel1.math.washington.edu (goedel1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.10]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8E0SBP05804; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:28:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:28:11 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Sorting Messages In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: kapil khosla X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** kapil khosla (khosla@mail.eecis.udel.edu) wrote in the pine-info list today: :) I want to sort my mails in different folders according to a pattern. I :) have enabled the Incoming - folder list option in my config and made a :) folder (My Name) IN IT. I want to know that how should I now set a :) pattern for it. You can't do that with Pine today, the only way to do so is to apply a patch which you can get from my web page (address below) called "define your own rules...". Directions on how to use the patch are in my web page. On the other hand, Pine4.40 will have that ability, but it's not known when that version will be released, though. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 19:32:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8E2WUi03153 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 19:32:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 13 19:32:29 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8E2WSA07773; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 19:32:28 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8E2VZK37796; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 19:31:35 -0700 Received: from mxu102.u.washington.edu (mxu102.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8E2Tj077216 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 19:29:45 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by mxu102.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8E2TiE08277 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 19:29:44 -0700 Received: FROM gabriel.blackangel.net BY mxu2.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 13 19:29:43 2001 -0700 Received: from localhost (andrew@localhost) by gabriel.blackangel.net (8.11.5/8.11.5) with ESMTP id f8E2Tco16752 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 19:29:38 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 19:29:38 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Andrew Ilgunas To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Compilation error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hiya! I'm trying to compile pine on a linux 2.4.5 with gcc 2.95.3 and the following is what's hanging up pine (pico and pilot compile fine): In file included from osdep.c:42: env_unix.c: In function `do_date': env_unix.c:296: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast env_unix.c:297: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type env_unix.c:297: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type env_unix.c:298: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type env_unix.c:299: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast env_unix.c:301: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type env_unix.c:301: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type env_unix.c:309: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type env_unix.c:312: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type env_unix.c:316: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type env_unix.c:316: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type env_unix.c:316: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type env_unix.c:317: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type env_unix.c:317: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type env_unix.c:317: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type In file included from osdep.c:46: tz_sv4.c: In function `rfc822_timezone': tz_sv4.c:30: `tzname' undeclared (first use in this function) tz_sv4.c:30: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once tz_sv4.c:30: for each function it appears in.) tz_sv4.c:30: `daylight' undeclared (first use in this function) tz_sv4.c:30: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type osdep.c: In function `checkpw': osdep.c:81: warning: initialization makes pointer from integer without a cast osdep.c:82: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type osdep.c:82: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type osdep.c:83: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type osdep.c:84: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast osdep.c:86: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type osdep.c:86: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type osdep.c:94: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type make[3]: *** [osdep.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [slx] Error 2 Any ideas? -------------------------------------------------------- -Andrew Ilgunas Database Adminsitrator -------------------------------------------------------- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:19:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8E4Jbi05090 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 13 21:19:36 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8E4JZW24897; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:19:35 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8E4HoK15752; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:17:51 -0700 Received: from mxu102.u.washington.edu (mxu102.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8E4H3084528 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:17:03 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by mxu102.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8E4H3E29469 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:17:03 -0700 Received: FROM femail16.sdc1.sfba.home.com BY mxu2.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 13 21:17:02 2001 -0700 Received: from cl3141799a ([24.11.143.222]) by femail16.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP id <20010914041702.YJMK6124.femail16.sdc1.sfba.home.com@cl3141799a> for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:17:02 -0700 Message-Id: <000201c13cd4$0a7222b0$6801a8c0@cl3141799a> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:16:34 -0700 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Joe Bernard" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine and Pop3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0003_01C13C99.5E134AB0" X-To: "'Pine Discussion Forum'" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C13C99.5E134AB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I am wondering if I have say an email on a isp, and want to setup pine to do that, how would I do this? Also I would be doing this throw telnet to a red hat linux server. Is this even possible? Let me know at jabonline@home.com ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C13C99.5E134AB0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am wondering if I have say an email on a isp, and want to setup pine to do that, how = would I do this?  Also I would be = doing this throw telnet to a red hat linux server.  Is this even = possible?

 

Let me know at jabonline@home.com

------=_NextPart_000_0003_01C13C99.5E134AB0-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 22:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8E50Wi31257 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 22:00:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 13 22:00:31 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8E50UA10912; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 22:00:30 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8E4vkp25518; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:57:46 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8E4uD093562 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:56:14 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8E4uC723450 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:56:12 -0700 Received: FROM euler.math.washington.edu BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 13 21:56:12 2001 -0700 Received: from goedel3.math.washington.edu (goedel3.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.12]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8E4uBP34557; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:56:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:56:11 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine and Pop3 In-Reply-To: <000201c13cd4$0a7222b0$6801a8c0@cl3141799a> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Joe Bernard X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Joe Bernard (jabonline@home.com) wrote today: :) I am wondering if I have say an email on a isp, and want to setup :) pine to do that, how would I do this? Also I would be doing this :) throw telnet to a red hat linux server. Is this even possible? Yes, there are several ways to do this: 1. The quickest way but not the best: Set your inbox-path as: inbox-path = {your.pop3.server/pop3/user=userid}INBOX 2. The longest way but the best: Press M S C and [X] enable-incoming-folders, quit Pine and restart it again. Once you restart Pine you need to go to your folder list (press L) and put the cursor over INBOX. Press "A", Pine will ask you to enter the server name, enter: your.pop3.server/pop3/user=userid after this Pine will ask you to enter the folder that you need to open, enter: INBOX Finally, Pine will ask you for a nickname. This is the name of the folder as you will see it later, so enter anything. You can always rename it later. The advantage of the second method over the first is that every time that you open the folder created this way you will have an account of the present state of the folder, this includes if you have new mail or not. With the first method, every time that you open the INBOX folder you will only see the state as it was the first time that you opened the folder. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 06:04:09 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8ED47i22207 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 06:04:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 14 06:04:02 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8ED42W03253; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 06:04:02 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8ED27E32602; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 06:02:07 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8ECvY053666 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 05:57:34 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8ECvU730457 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 05:57:34 -0700 Received: FROM snt6abemail.airafrique.sita.net BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 14 05:56:06 2001 -0700 Received: from airafrique.net ([57.227.40.214]) by snt6abemail.airafrique.sita.net (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with ESMTP id 381 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 12:56:54 +0100 Message-Id: <3BA1FE08.F50DCF8D@airafrique.net> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 12:54:32 +0000 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Charles Alain" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: unsubscrition MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: fr X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN kindly unsubscribe me to this mail group. Thks -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 08:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8EFs3i04741 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 08:54:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 14 08:54:01 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8EFs1W08119; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 08:54:01 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8EFhhX17042; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 08:43:43 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8EFdW0115022 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 08:39:33 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8EFdVv32108 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 08:39:31 -0700 Received: FROM users.assist.ro BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 14 08:39:30 2001 -0700 Received: from dialup30.assist.ro (dialup30.assist.ro [194.102.130.62]) by users.assist.ro (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f8EFd5809160 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 18:39:13 +0300 Message-Id: <4417154655.20010914170329@yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 17:03:29 +0300 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Silviu Cojocaru To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: unsubscrition In-Reply-To: <3BA1FE08.F50DCF8D@airafrique.net> References: <3BA1FE08.F50DCF8D@airafrique.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Friday, September 14, 2001, 3:54:32 PM, Charles Alain wrote: > kindly unsubscribe me to this mail group. > Thks List-Unsubscribe: The above is found in the header of all messages on this list. Now you can unsubscribe from the list by yourself. -- A more experienced programmer does not make less bugs. He just realizes what went wrong more quickly. __________________________________________________________________ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:24:18 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8EGO9i21666 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:24:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 14 09:24:07 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8EGO6A26877; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:24:06 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8EGNcK06010; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:23:38 -0700 Received: from mxu102.u.washington.edu (mxu102.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8EGGl079204 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:16:48 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by mxu102.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8EGGlE23250 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:16:47 -0700 Received: FROM zeus.med.uottawa.ca BY mxu2.u.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 14 09:16:47 2001 -0700 Received: from localhost (nbirkett@localhost) by zeus.med.uottawa.ca (8.9.1/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA01687 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 12:13:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 12:13:46 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Nick Birkett (x8289)" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: unsubscrition In-Reply-To: <4417154655.20010914170329@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This question has come up before. With my default pine settings (full headers off), I don't get the 'List-Unsubscribe' line displayed. It never would have occured to me to turn on 'full headers' in order to find the information about list contact, unbsubscribe, etc. Is there some way to make this more obvious to list users? Not that I want to unsubscribe myself, but..... > List-Unsubscribe: > > The above is found in the header of all messages on this list. > Now you can unsubscribe from the list by yourself. > > -- > A more experienced programmer does not make less bugs. > He just realizes what went wrong more quickly. > __________________________________________________________________ > > ======================================================================== Nicholas Birkett, M.D., M.Sc. Epidemiology and Community Medicine University of Ottawa nbirkett@zeus.med.uottawa.ca 451 Smyth Rd., (613)-562-5800 x 8289 (voice) Ottawa, Ontario, (613)-562-5465 (fax) Canada. K1H 8M5 ========================================================================= From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:32:58 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8EGWti21302 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:32:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 14 09:32:54 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8EGWrA27176; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:32:53 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8EGWWp17640; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:32:32 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8EGUW022656 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:30:34 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8EGUW711393 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:30:32 -0700 Received: FROM euler.math.washington.edu BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 14 09:30:32 2001 -0700 Received: from goedel1.math.washington.edu (goedel1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.10]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8EGUTP63212; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:30:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:30:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: unsubscrition In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: "Nick Birkett (x8289)" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Nick Birkett (x8289) (nbirkett@zeus.med.uottawa.ca) wrote in the...: :) This question has come up before. With my default pine settings (full :) headers off), I don't get the 'List-Unsubscribe' line displayed. It never :) would have occured to me to turn on 'full headers' in order to find the :) information about list contact, unbsubscribe, etc. Is there some way to :) make this more obvious to list users? Not that I want to unsubscribe :) myself, but..... These special headers are defined in some RFC, whose number escapes to me at this time. The latest version of Pine supports that RFC, and what that means is that it also recognizes them and, if any of them are present, Pine appends a message at the bottom of the original message warning you about this feature for a message that contains those headers and giving you the option to subscribe, unsubscribe, request help, etc, by following internal links. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:37:06 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8EGb3i04051 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:37:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 14 09:37:01 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8EGb1W09751; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:37:01 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8EGaeK25278; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:36:40 -0700 Received: from mxu102.u.washington.edu (mxu102.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8EGVQ062936 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:31:26 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by mxu102.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8EGVQE29485 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:31:26 -0700 Received: FROM evtvir03.tc.fluke.com BY mxu2.u.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 14 09:31:25 2001 -0700 Received: from evtvir03.tc.fluke.com ([129.196.128.53]) by evtvir03.tc.fluke.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id R7CWQSCG; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:31:25 -0700 Received: FROM dd BY evtvir03.tc.fluke.com ; Fri Sep 14 09:31:24 2001 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: David Dyck To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: unsubscrition In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: "Nick Birkett (x8289)" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN you're using pine 3.95, and I don't know if it has the feature that pine 4.33 has where every message that have certain header messages report have the following note appended to the end of the displayed text message, so yo don't have to look at the headers [ Note: This message contains email list management information ] If you selected the highighted note, the help system tells you how to unsubscribe. On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Nick Birkett (x8289) wrote: > From: "Nick Birkett (x8289)" > To: Pine Discussion Forum > > This question has come up before. With my default pine settings (full > headers off), I don't get the 'List-Unsubscribe' line displayed. It never > would have occured to me to turn on 'full headers' in order to find the > information about list contact, unbsubscribe, etc. Is there some way to > make this more obvious to list users? Not that I want to unsubscribe > myself, but..... > > > List-Unsubscribe: From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8EGi2i20309 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:44:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 14 09:44:00 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8EGi0W10027; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:44:00 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8EGgxX17110; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:42:59 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8EGcS073192 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:38:30 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8EGcSv12149 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:38:28 -0700 Received: FROM zeus.med.uottawa.ca BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 14 09:38:27 2001 -0700 Received: from localhost (nbirkett@localhost) by zeus.med.uottawa.ca (8.9.1/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA01762; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 12:35:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 12:35:24 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Nick Birkett (x8289)" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: unsubscrition In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: David Dyck X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Yeh, I am using that version. Never got around to up-dating our old SUN. My new machine will have the latest pine on it. Guess I spoke too soon. On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, David Dyck wrote: > Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:31:26 -0700 (PDT) > From: David Dyck > To: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: Re: unsubscrition > > > you're using pine 3.95, and I don't know if it has the feature that pine > 4.33 has where every message that have certain header messages report have > the following note appended to the end of the displayed text message, so > yo don't have to look at the headers > > [ Note: This message contains email list management information ] > > If you selected the highighted note, the help system tells you > how to unsubscribe. > > > On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Nick Birkett (x8289) wrote: > > > From: "Nick Birkett (x8289)" > > To: Pine Discussion Forum > > > > This question has come up before. With my default pine settings (full > > headers off), I don't get the 'List-Unsubscribe' line displayed. It never > > would have occured to me to turn on 'full headers' in order to find the > > information about list contact, unbsubscribe, etc. Is there some way to > > make this more obvious to list users? Not that I want to unsubscribe > > myself, but..... > > > > > List-Unsubscribe: > > ======================================================================== Nicholas Birkett, M.D., M.Sc. Epidemiology and Community Medicine University of Ottawa nbirkett@zeus.med.uottawa.ca 451 Smyth Rd., (613)-562-5800 x 8289 (voice) Ottawa, Ontario, (613)-562-5465 (fax) Canada. K1H 8M5 ========================================================================= From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 14:35:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8ELZYi22148 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 14:35:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 14 14:35:25 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8ELZPA06820; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 14:35:25 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8ELZCp23718; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 14:35:13 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8ELVh033510 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 14:31:46 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8ELVg702186 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 14:31:42 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 14 14:31:42 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8ELVfW21461; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 14:31:41 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8ELSOX27634; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 14:28:24 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8EKpW044060 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 13:51:33 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8EKpW714206 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 13:51:32 -0700 Received: FROM mxout2.cac.washington.edu BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 14 13:51:31 2001 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8EKpVs26598; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 13:51:31 -0700 Received: from [128.95.135.225] (D-128-95-135-225.dhcp.washington.edu [128.95.135.225]) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.0+UW01.09/8.12.0+UW01.09) with ESMTP id f8EKpVHY022917 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Sep 2001 13:51:31 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 13:51:31 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine 4.40 now available MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: PINE-ANNOUNCE-owner@u.washington.edu X-To: Pine Announcement List X-X-Sender: hubert@shivams.cac.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This note is to announce the availability of the Pine Message System version 4.40. This release introduces some new functionality and addresses some bugs found in earlier versions. Specific information can be found in the built-in release notes ("R" off the Main Menu), and via: http://www.washington.edu/pine/ and ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/docs/ Source for the latest Pine release is available in: ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pine.tar.Z and ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pine.tar.gz and precompiled binaries for the various systems we have direct access to are available in: ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/unix-bin and ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/unix-bin-compressed The corresponding PC-Pine distribution is available in: ftp://ftp.cac.washington.edu/pine/pcpine/pm440w32.zip As with all Pine releases, it is important that you carefully test and determine for yourself that it performs suitably in your environment before placing Pine into production use. The Pine Development Team -- ------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/pine-announce.html ------------------------------------------------------------- -- ------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/pine-announce.html ------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 16:38:46 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8ENcji07845 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 16:38:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 14 16:38:39 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8ENcdA11352; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 16:38:39 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8ENbgK33458; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 16:37:42 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8ENZE094830 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 16:35:14 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8ENZE701045 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 16:35:14 -0700 Received: FROM ursa-minor.fac.cs.cmu.edu BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 14 16:35:13 2001 -0700 Received: from URSA-MINOR.FAC.CS.CMU.EDU by ursa-minor.fac.cs.cmu.edu id aa92173; 14 Sep 2001 19:35 EDT Message-Id: <200109142335.f8ENZE701045@mxu101.u.washington.edu> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 19:35:12 -0400 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matthew C Weigel To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: $CCLIENTDIR and ../c-client in 4.33 X-Sender: Matthew_Weigel@ursa-minor.fac.cs.cmu.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I'm trying to set up a cleanly automated build of c-client and PINE from different source directories, and I came across the following bug. $CCLIENTDIR (as used in pine4.33/pine/makefile.*) is not used to determine the location of header files in #include statements in the source files themselves. So, for instance, make requires that $CCLIENTDIR/smtp.h exist to build send.o, but send.c depends upon "../c-client/smtp.h" in order to actually compile. In addition to that problem, I must confess some confusion about some issues in building pine at all - build doesn't pass a target to make in the pine subdirectory, the makefiles don't have an 'all' target, and $OFILES depends upon $HFILES but doesn't appear to have any associated actions. -- Matthew Weigel Research Systems Programmer mcweigel+@cs.cmu.edu -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 15 Sep 2001 17:10:46 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8G0Aji17062 for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2001 17:10:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Sep 15 17:10:43 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8G0AhW20409; Sat, 15 Sep 2001 17:10:43 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8G0AMp30156; Sat, 15 Sep 2001 17:10:26 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8G08h094652 for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2001 17:08:43 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8G08hv25780 for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2001 17:08:43 -0700 Received: FROM users.assist.ro BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Sat Sep 15 17:08:42 2001 -0700 Received: from dialup22.assist.ro (dialup22.assist.ro [194.102.130.54]) by users.assist.ro (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f8G08Z814745 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 03:08:36 +0300 Message-Id: <16651757007.20010916031111@yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 03:11:11 +0300 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Silviu Cojocaru To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Sorting Messages In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Friday, September 14, 2001, 3:28:11 AM, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > On the other hand, Pine4.40 will have that ability, but it's > not known when that version will be released, though. :) Just look what I found by looking at the headers: Message-Id: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Someone lived in the future here ;) -- "Hi-ho, hi-ho, it's hand grenades I throw..." __________________________________________________________________ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:29:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8H1T3i26951 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:29:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Sep 16 18:29:01 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8H1T0A01172; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:29:01 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8H1Q2X30534; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:26:03 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8H1Nw086216 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:23:58 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8H1Nwv23036 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:23:58 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Sun Sep 16 18:23:57 2001 -0700 Received: from students.aurora.edu (mail.aurora.edu [64.107.89.49]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8H1NtW15102 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:23:55 -0700 Received: from localhost (slowe@localhost) by students.aurora.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8H1MTU07644 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:22:29 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:22:29 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Lowe To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Option /notls within PC-Pine 4.40 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Information List X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I have searched the documentation files, along with the Pine Information Center website. I cannot get the new version of PC-PIne 4.40 to start because I do not have all pieces completely in place for a secure connection. I am close, but as they say, "Close, but not cigar!!" The error message indicates that I can start PC-PINE 4.40 using the /notls option. So, which PC-PINE option would that be? Thanks in advance. -- Steve Lowe -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:13:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8H2Dki12149 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:13:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Sep 16 19:13:45 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8H2DjA02027; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:13:45 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8H2ASK10146; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:10:28 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8H29n010006 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:09:49 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8H29n725719 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:09:49 -0700 Received: FROM students.aurora.edu BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Sun Sep 16 19:09:48 2001 -0700 Received: from localhost (slowe@localhost) by students.aurora.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8H29lu04033; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 21:09:47 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 21:09:47 -0500 (CDT) Reply-To: Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Lowe To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Option /notls within PC-Pine 4.40 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Terry Gray X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Terry -- That did it. Thank you for the quick response. -- Steve On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Terry Gray wrote: > Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:46:34 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) > From: Terry Gray > To: Steve Lowe > Cc: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: Re: Option /notls within PC-Pine 4.40 > > Steve, > the /notls would be part of the host specification for the email server; > e.g. inbox-path = {foo.aurora.edu/notls}inbox > > Does that help? > > -teg > > On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Steve Lowe wrote: > > > > > I have searched the documentation files, along with the Pine Information > > Center website. > > > > I cannot get the new version of PC-PIne 4.40 to start because I do not > > have all pieces completely in place for a secure connection. I am close, > > but as they say, "Close, but not cigar!!" > > > > The error message indicates that I can start PC-PINE 4.40 using the /notls > > option. So, which PC-PINE option would that be? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > -- Steve Lowe > > > > > > > > > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:01:54 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8H31ri06930 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:01:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Sep 16 20:01:51 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8H31pA02900; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:01:51 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8H2wvK20946; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:58:57 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8H2w60100562 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:58:07 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8H2w6701371 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:58:06 -0700 Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Sun Sep 16 19:58:05 2001 -0700 Received: from students.aurora.edu (mail.aurora.edu [64.107.89.49]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8H2w1W16777 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 19:58:05 -0700 Received: from localhost (slowe@localhost) by students.aurora.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8H2vtB13983 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2001 21:57:55 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 21:57:55 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Lowe To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Accepting ssl Certificates MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Information List X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I am using the openssl 0.9.6 on a small Digital Unix platform. I updated by inetd.conf file to include the line for imapds, along with including imapds 993/tcp in the /etc/services file. The appropriate imapd.pem was produced. When I access the system using PC-PINE 4.40, I am prompted on the certificate. So far, so good. If I trust the certificate, I enter 'Y'. I can bypass the certificate check with the option /novalidate-cert. If I modify my pinerc file to bypass the certificate check, I would hazard a guess that I am still running secure -- I trust the fact that I am connecting to the correct mail server. Have I thought through this process correctly? Thanks in advance. -- Steve -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:35:21 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8H7ZKi06209 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 17 00:35:18 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8H7Z9W22334; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:35:09 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8H7WIX11046; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:32:18 -0700 Received: from mxu102.u.washington.edu (mxu102.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8H7Us043262 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:30:58 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by mxu102.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8H7UnE14444 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:30:54 -0700 Received: FROM Morgoth.esiway.net BY mxu2.u.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 17 00:30:48 2001 -0700 Received: from Megathlon.ESI (Ghost.esi.it [193.194.16.225]) by Morgoth.esiway.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA03198; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:30:43 +0200 Received: from relay.ESI (IDENT:marco@relay.ESI [10.10.10.3]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by Megathlon.ESI (8.11.5/8.11.5) with ESMTP id f8H7Ugw16765; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:30:42 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:30:42 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Marco Colombo To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine & Cyrus IMAP In-Reply-To: <002801c134ee$5e4efc20$3300a8c0@zeus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Administrator X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Administrator wrote: > I am running a Cyrus IMAP Server and am attempting to run Pine with this > configuration. My mail is stored in /var/spool/imap/user/NAME. The > permissions on this directory structure are owned by cyrus, and the > group is root, but root has no permissions on the directory structure. > I am successfully using Microsoft Outlook, and a Webmail client to > connect to read my mail, but I would also like to be able to read my > mail using pine. It is faithful, and fast. I was unable to connect to > the imap server until I tried as root. Then I was able to connect to > any account by using the username and password. Is there a way to > configure normal users to read mail. Also when I did connect as root to > the IMAP server every time I wanted to change a directory it would ask > for my password again. Is there a way to configure pine so that my > password does not need to be entered in order to perform every command. > I am running a Debian box and have download the precompiled pine bin > from the ftp server. Thank you for all your help and time. > > Michael Weber > > I've been using Pine and Cyrus IMAPD for years, and never encountered the problems you mention... $ pine -v Pine 4.33 built Sat Mar 31 06:57:36 EST 2001 on porky.devel.redhat.com Here's some lines from my .pinerc: inbox-path={imap/ssl}INBOX folder-collections=Mail/[], {imap/ssl}INBOX.[] I can't remenber of ANY uncommon setting, Pine-side. As I wild guess, I think you're having troubles with SASL. Pine tries to use the CRAM-MD5 SASL mechanism, if available, and it probably tries and uses the sasldb file on the server. Depending on the server configuration, you may get unexpected results. So try and turn that mech off, maybe just delete (or move away) the pluging (should be /usr/lib/sasl/libcrammd5.so.* with default paths). MS OutLook uses PLAIN, AFAIK. .TM. -- ____/ ____/ / / / / Marco Colombo ___/ ___ / / Technical Manager / / / ESI s.r.l. _____/ _____/ _/ Colombo@ESI.it From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:07:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8HH7vi28895 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:07:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 17 10:07:56 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8HH7tA22546; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:07:55 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8HH4YE09404; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:04:38 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8HH3L077306 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:03:22 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8HH3L715003 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:03:21 -0700 Received: FROM mxout2.cac.washington.edu BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 17 10:03:21 2001 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8HH3Js25760; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:03:19 -0700 Received: from [128.95.135.225] (D-128-95-135-225.dhcp.washington.edu [128.95.135.225]) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.0+UW01.09/8.12.0+UW01.09) with ESMTP id f8HH3JHY002514 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:03:19 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 10:03:19 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Accepting ssl Certificates In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Steve Lowe X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: hubert@shivams.cac.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Yes, it is still encrypted. If you are connected to the correct host, you are ok. You don't really know you are connected to the correct host without the certificate validation. -- Steve Hubert Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Steve Lowe wrote: > > I am using the openssl 0.9.6 on a small Digital Unix platform. I updated > by inetd.conf file to include the line for imapds, along with including > imapds 993/tcp in the /etc/services file. The appropriate imapd.pem was > produced. > > When I access the system using PC-PINE 4.40, I am prompted on the > certificate. So far, so good. If I trust the certificate, I enter 'Y'. > I can bypass the certificate check with the option /novalidate-cert. > > If I modify my pinerc file to bypass the certificate check, I would hazard > a guess that I am still running secure -- I trust the fact that I am > connecting to the correct mail server. > > Have I thought through this process correctly? > > Thanks in advance. > > -- Steve > > > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8HL54i16073 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:05:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 17 14:05:02 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8HL51W14264; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:05:01 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8HL4mE32246; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:04:48 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8HKsg072376 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:54:43 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8HKsg714993 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:54:42 -0700 Received: FROM falcon.dickinson.edu BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 17 13:52:37 2001 -0700 Received: from falcon.dickinson.edu by falcon.dickinson.edu (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/25Feb99-0911AM) id QAA0000010221; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:52:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:52:18 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Don Newcomer To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine 4.40 problem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Info mailing list X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I've just installed version 4.40 on my Alpha box runing Tru64 UNIX version 4.0D. Everything appeared to be working fine until went to the folders command and told it to select all folders with unseen messages. It goes through all of the folders and then I get the message "Received abort signal", it dumps core, and exits. Any idea what the problem might be? ================================================================================ Don Newcomer Dickinson College Associate Director, System and Network Services P.O. Box 1773 newcomer@dickinson.edu Carlisle, PA 17013 Phone: (717) 245-1256 FAX: (717) 245-1690 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:35:07 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8HLZ1i21406 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:35:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 17 14:34:59 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8HLYxW15655; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:34:59 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8HLYsX32076; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:34:54 -0700 Received: from mxu102.u.washington.edu (mxu102.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8HLYE013822 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:34:14 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by mxu102.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8HLYEE22048 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:34:14 -0700 Received: FROM euler.math.washington.edu BY mxu2.u.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 17 14:34:13 2001 -0700 Received: from goedel1.math.washington.edu (goedel1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.10]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8HLY7P241347; Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:34:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:34:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.40 problem In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Don Newcomer X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Don Newcomer (newcomer@dickinson.edu) wrote in the pine-info list today: :) I've just installed version 4.40 on my Alpha box runing Tru64 UNIX :) version 4.0D. Everything appeared to be working fine until went to the :) folders command and told it to select all folders with unseen messages. :) It goes through all of the folders and then I get the message "Received :) abort signal", it dumps core, and exits. Any idea what the problem :) might be? Dear Don I have found the problem to be solved if you apply the patch that you can find in my web page (address below), look under "bug fixes". -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 07:33:38 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8IEXai11304 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 07:33:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 18 07:33:35 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8IEXZA27072; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 07:33:35 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8IEUMX08820; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 07:30:23 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8IEP9040744 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 07:25:09 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8IEP9711039 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 07:25:09 -0700 Received: FROM falcon.dickinson.edu BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 18 07:25:08 2001 -0700 Received: from falcon.dickinson.edu by falcon.dickinson.edu (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/25Feb99-0911AM) id KAA0000001362; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 10:24:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 10:24:27 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Don Newcomer To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.40 problem In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Eduardo Chappa X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Thanks, Eduardo. That patch did the trick nicely. Don On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > *** Don Newcomer (newcomer@dickinson.edu) wrote in the pine-info list today: > > :) I've just installed version 4.40 on my Alpha box runing Tru64 UNIX > :) version 4.0D. Everything appeared to be working fine until went to the > :) folders command and told it to select all folders with unseen messages. > :) It goes through all of the folders and then I get the message "Received > :) abort signal", it dumps core, and exits. Any idea what the problem > :) might be? > > Dear Don > > I have found the problem to be solved if you apply the patch that you can > find in my web page (address below), look under "bug fixes". > > -- > Eduardo > http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:52:20 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8J2qIi17282 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 18 19:52:17 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8J2qHW05513; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:52:17 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8J2o1X29772; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:50:01 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8J2mF041754 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:48:15 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8J2mEx26029 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:48:15 -0700 Received: FROM hkusua.hku.hk BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 18 19:48:13 2001 -0700 Received: (from kmku@localhost) by hkusua.hku.hk (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f8J2mZ121218 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:48:35 +0800 (HKT) Message-Id: <200109190248.f8J2mZ121218@hkusua.hku.hk> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:48:35 +0800 (HKT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Dr. K. M. Ku" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: encrypted folder feature MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, i would like to know if PINE got encrypted folder feature? so that superuser cannot read the mails under folder Regards, --- Kam-ming Ku (kmku) Big-5:[=C5U=C0A=A9=FA] GB: ~{9K=3DuCw~}=09 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 05:51:12 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JCpAi29266 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 05:51:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 19 05:51:09 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8JCp5A06808; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 05:51:05 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8JCoKE28990; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 05:50:21 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8JCnU029104 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 05:49:30 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JCnTx12977 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 05:49:30 -0700 Received: FROM lapd.cj.edu.ro BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 19 05:49:29 2001 -0700 Received: (qmail 5429 invoked by uid 559); 19 Sep 2001 12:49:06 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Sep 2001 12:49:06 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 15:49:06 +0300 (EEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Seby To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine 4.40 problem In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Why pine 4.40 doens't support maildir.. it should suport maildir, because maildir it used in almost everyserver in the world, so i think you should include maildir support in pine.. or give an officeal patch... Thankyou... And I hope pine 4.41 will have maildir support .... Seby... --------------- http://lapd.cj.edu.ro/~seby E-mail: seby@lapd.cj.edu.ro --------------- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 07:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from claven.cac.washington.edu (claven.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.7]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JEGai26754 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 07:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY claven.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 19 07:16:34 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8JEGXW20771; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 07:16:33 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with SMTP id f8JEGHX08892; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 07:16:17 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f8JEFa0107282 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 07:15:36 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JEFW725055 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 07:15:36 -0700 Received: FROM falcon.dickinson.edu BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 19 07:15:32 2001 -0700 Received: from falcon.dickinson.edu by falcon.dickinson.edu (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/25Feb99-0911AM) id KAA0000030415; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:14:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:14:54 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Don Newcomer To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine 4.40 IMAP problems MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Info mailing list X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I've run into a problem with the version of IMAP that comes with Pine 4.40. I'm using an Alpha box running Tru64 UNIX version 4.0D. If I use that version of imapd, I can connect from PC-Pine 4.40 but Outlook 2000 stops working. Until this is resolved I'm using my old version of imapd. Any idea what the problem may be? ================================================================================ Don Newcomer Dickinson College Associate Director, System and Network Services P.O. Box 1773 newcomer@dickinson.edu Carlisle, PA 17013 Phone: (717) 245-1256 FAX: (717) 245-1690 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:27:19 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JFRHi12732 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:27:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 19 08:27:16 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8JFRFA11092; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:27:15 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JFQuK67398; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:26:57 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8JFABN129404 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:10:12 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JFABv03140 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:10:11 -0700 Received: FROM smtp.uvm.edu BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 19 08:10:10 2001 -0700 Received: from elk.uvm.edu (elk.uvm.edu [132.198.101.63]) by smtp.uvm.edu (8.11.5/8.11.5) with ESMTP id f8JFAAq27074 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 11:10:10 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 11:10:10 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Aaron S. Hawley" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: encrypted folder feature In-Reply-To: <200109190248.f8J2mZ121218@hkusua.hku.hk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN http://www.washington.edu/pine/faq/whatis.html#2.1.2 On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Dr. K. M. Ku wrote: > Hi, > > i would like to know if PINE got encrypted folder feature? so that > superuser cannot read the mails under folder -- __________________________________________ PINE 4.33 Mailer - www.washington.edu/pine From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:40:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JFeZi14332 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:40:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 19 08:40:34 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8JFeXW23583; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:40:33 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JFeKr07112; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:40:20 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8JFckN19296 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:38:47 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JFcj725672 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:38:46 -0700 Received: FROM ibm-1.MPA-Garching.MPG.DE BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 19 08:38:44 2001 -0700 Received: from dhcp-52.mpa-garching.mpg.de (dhcp-52.MPA-Garching.MPG.DE [130.183.85.152]) by ibm-1.MPA-Garching.MPG.DE (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA90288 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 17:38:41 +0200 Received: from localhost (ch@localhost) by dhcp-52.mpa-garching.mpg.de (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f8JFbQf09410 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 17:37:26 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 17:37:26 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: ch To: Pine Discussion Forum MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: X-Authentication-Warning: dhcp-52.mpa-garching.mpg.de: ch owned process doing -bs X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN pine-info@u.washington.edu -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:16:35 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JGGYi11311 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:16:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 19 09:16:31 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8JGGVW25432; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:16:31 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JGFqK38900; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:15:53 -0700 Received: from mxu102.u.washington.edu (mxu102.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8JGEuN94042 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:14:56 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by mxu102.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JGEuE07316 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:14:56 -0700 Received: FROM evtvir03.tc.fluke.com BY mxu2.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 19 09:14:55 2001 -0700 Received: from evtvir03.tc.fluke.com ([129.196.128.53]) by evtvir03.tc.fluke.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id TD77ZGW2; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:14:55 -0700 Received: FROM dd BY evtvir03.tc.fluke.com ; Wed Sep 19 09:14:41 2001 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:14:59 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: David Dyck To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.40 problem In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Seby X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Seby wrote: > Why pine 4.40 doens't support maildir.. A quick search with google leads to http://www.washington.edu/imap/documentation/formats.txt.html The Maildir format used by qmail has all of the performance disadvantages of mh noted above, with the additional problem that the files are renamed in order to change their status so you end up having to rescan the directory frequently the current names (particularly in a shared mailbox scenario). It doesn't scale, and it represents a support nightmare; it will therefore never be supported in the official distribution. Maildir support code for c-client is available from third parties; but, if you use it, it is entirely at your own risk (read: don't complain about how poorly it performs or bugs). ( actually I got there via http://www.courier-mta.org/mbox-vs-maildir/. where they were they referenced the earlier url, their conclusion were: ... The final conclusion is that -- except in some specific instances -- using maildirs will be just as fast -- and in sometimes much faster -- than mbox files, while placing less of a load on the rest of the mail system. The claims in the UW-IMAP server's documentation regarding maildir performance can be supported only in certain, specific, very narrowly-defined conditions. There is no simple answer on which mail storage format is better. A lot depends on many variables that vary widely in different situations. Besides the raw benchmarks shown above, other factors include the mail server software being used, what kind of storage is being used, and the available network bandwidth. The final answer depends on all of the above. Sounds like it may not be an easy answer... From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 12:30:51 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JJUmi27337 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 12:30:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 19 12:30:45 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8JJUjA21761; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 12:30:45 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JJUeK28288; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 12:30:40 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8JJT9N22322 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 12:29:09 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JJT9v24347 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 12:29:09 -0700 Received: FROM lapd.cj.edu.ro BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 19 12:29:07 2001 -0700 Received: (qmail 16571 invoked by uid 559); 19 Sep 2001 19:28:54 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Sep 2001 19:28:54 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 22:28:54 +0300 (EEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Seby To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Pine 4.40 problem In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: David Dyck X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN OK, i undestand that, but let say that some people like pine and maildir .. so the develepment teem of pine can includ a maildir suport in pine (or a patch that can be patch on pine if that people like to use pine withs maildir suport) .. And about performance , maybe that people have a super computer :)) and they don't wory if the system is a little of 2% overload than in normal cases.. so i say that pine has to includ maildir and mailbox suport .. in the same source .. and a user can chose at compile time which type of maildir want's .. this will be better ... This is my opinion .. Seby... On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, David Dyck wrote: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Seby wrote: > > > Why pine 4.40 doens't support maildir.. > > A quick search with google leads to > > http://www.washington.edu/imap/documentation/formats.txt.html > > > The Maildir format used by qmail has all of the performance > disadvantages of mh noted above, with the additional problem that the > files are renamed in order to change their status so you end up having > to rescan the directory frequently the current names (particularly in > a shared mailbox scenario). It doesn't scale, and it represents a > support nightmare; it will therefore never be supported in the > official distribution. Maildir support code for c-client is available > from third parties; but, if you use it, it is entirely at your own > risk (read: don't complain about how poorly it performs or bugs). > > ( actually I got there via > http://www.courier-mta.org/mbox-vs-maildir/. > where they were they referenced > the earlier url, their conclusion were: ... > > The final conclusion is that -- except in some specific instances -- > using maildirs will be just as fast -- and in sometimes much faster -- > than mbox files, while placing less of a load on the rest of the mail > system. The claims in the UW-IMAP server's documentation regarding > maildir performance can be supported only in certain, specific, very > narrowly-defined conditions. There is no simple answer on which mail > storage format is better. A lot depends on many variables that vary > widely in different situations. Besides the raw benchmarks shown above, > other factors include the mail server software being used, what kind of > storage is being used, and the available network bandwidth. The final > answer depends on all of the above. > > Sounds like it may not be an easy answer... > --------------- http://lapd.cj.edu.ro/~seby E-mail: seby@lapd.cj.edu.ro --------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:24:07 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JLO1i18539 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:24:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 19 14:23:56 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8JLNtW06477; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:23:55 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JLNNK24514; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:23:23 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8JL8wN92298 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:08:58 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JL8w709674 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:08:58 -0700 Received: FROM smtp.gospelcom.net BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 19 14:08:57 2001 -0700 Received: (qmail 29739 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2001 21:08:57 -0000 Received: from jabbok.gospelcom.net (HELO amos.gf.gospelcom.net) (204.253.132.4) by joppa.gospelcom.net with SMTP; 19 Sep 2001 21:08:57 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 17:08:53 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Joel Boonstra To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: pine 4.40 question MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: joel@amos.gf.gospelcom.net X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, I just successfully installed pine 4.40 on my RedHat 7.1 machine. In comparing it with 4.33, it seems that the SIZE index-format token has changed in behavior slightly. In 4.33, sizes were presented with commas separating the numbers at logical places; 4.40 doesn't seem to use commas at all. Also, the threshold for displaying a size in Kilobytes or bytes seems to have changed. Here are a few examples: 4.33: ===== 8 + 01.07.18 sender (1,031) subject 9 + 01.08.03 sender (3,258) subject 10 + 01.08.04 sender (11,291) subject 11 + 01.08.27 sender (3,240) subject ===== versus 4.40: ===== 8 + 01.07.18 sender (1031) subject 9 + 01.08.03 sender (3258) subject 10 + 01.08.04 sender (11K) subject 11 + 01.08.27 sender (3240) subject ===== Obviously the sender and subject lines have been changed by me, but the rest is copied straight from the screen. You can see that the 11K message is displayed in bytes in 4.33, but in K in 4.40. I'm also using a custom index-format, but I've verified this on the standard index-format, as well. I guess I don't mind the change, but I'm wondering if that was intentional or not, and if it was, what the rationale behind it was. Is it possible to define the threshold and the display format for the SIZE token? I looked at the other tokens, but they don't seem to accomplish this, either. I can't find this documented in the changelog, and I don't recall seeing discussion on this list about it, either. If this is old hat, please point me to the appropriate URL, and I'll be quiet. TIA, -- [ joel boonstra | jboonstra@gospelcom.net ] -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:39:12 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JLdAi20203 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:39:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 19 14:39:08 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8JLd8W07159; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:39:08 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JLcwA08950; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:38:58 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8JLWgN83694 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:32:42 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8JLWfx25148 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:32:41 -0700 Received: FROM euler.math.washington.edu BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 19 14:32:41 2001 -0700 Received: from goedel1.math.washington.edu (goedel1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.10]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8JLWdP367837; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pine 4.40 question In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Joel Boonstra X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Joel Boonstra (jboonstra@gospelcom.net) wrote in the pine-info list today: :) I just successfully installed pine 4.40 on my RedHat 7.1 machine. In :) comparing it with 4.33, it seems that the SIZE index-format token has :) changed in behavior slightly. In 4.33, sizes were presented with commas :) separating the numbers at logical places; 4.40 doesn't seem to use commas :) at all. This change is not documented in the release notes, but in the definition of the token SIZE: SIZE This token represents the total size, in bytes, of the message. If a "K" (Kilobyte) follows the number, the size is approximately 1,000 times that many bytes (rounded to the nearest 1,000). If an "M" (Megabyte) follows the number, the size is approximately 1,000,000 times that many bytes. I have no idea why it was changed, though. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 01:53:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8K8qbi06096 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 01:52:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 20 01:50:23 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8K8oNW25974; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 01:50:23 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8K8o3A31208; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 01:50:03 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8K8WLN92764 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 01:32:21 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8K8WK724080 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 01:32:20 -0700 Received: FROM legolas.mdh.se BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 20 01:32:19 2001 -0700 Received: by legolas.mdh.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA02861; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:32:21 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:32:20 +0200 (MET DST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Emil Isberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Have the option "include-text-in-reply" changed? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: cel95eig@mds.mdh.se X-To: Eduardo Chappa X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I can't get it to work... I always get the prompt "Include original message in Reply?" no matter if I have "include-text-in-reply" set or unset... And no I don't have "enable-reply-indent-string-editing" set... Ohh... And my "locally modified" pine uses Chappas all.patch... -- It's possible that the whole purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 02:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8K9I6i17388 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 02:18:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 20 02:18:04 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8K9I4W26571; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 02:18:04 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8K9HDr18806; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 02:17:13 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8K9FFN131128 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 02:15:15 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8K9FFv21455 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 02:15:15 -0700 Received: FROM euler.math.washington.edu BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 20 02:15:15 2001 -0700 Received: from goedel1.math.washington.edu (goedel1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.10]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8K9FCP401489; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 02:15:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 02:15:12 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: Eduardo Chappa Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Have the option "include-text-in-reply" changed? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Emil Isberg X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Emil Isberg (emil.isberg@mds.mdh.se) wrote today: :) I can't get it to work... :) :) I always get the prompt "Include original message in Reply?" no matter if :) I have "include-text-in-reply" set or unset... :) :) And no I don't have "enable-reply-indent-string-editing" set... :) :) Ohh... And my "locally modified" pine uses Chappas all.patch... As you point out, there are normally two variables that affect the appaearence of the question "include message in reply?", they are the [X] include-text-in-reply and the [X] enable-reply-indent-string-editing. If the latter is checked then Pine will ask you the question above. If you applied the patch "all.patch", there's a third condition which will make Pine ask you the above question, it is "[X] alternate-reply-menu", whose idea is to make Pine manually override configuration options (e.g. strip (or not) the signature automatically). If you do not want to have Pine ask you that question, then unselect that option. The intended behavior is that a) the option is not enabled by default, so if you did not enable it, and the option is selected then this is a bug, and b) if your configurations looks like [ ] alternate-reply-menu [ ] enable-reply-indent-string-editing [X] include-text-in-reply and you are getting the question, then this is a bug. If you've found a bug please let me know. Thanks. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:58:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8KFw3i31728 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:58:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 20 08:58:01 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8KFw1W03930; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:58:01 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8KFvdA23154; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:57:39 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8KFsFN107362 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:54:15 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8KFsE720773 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:54:15 -0700 Received: FROM femail46.sdc1.sfba.home.com BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 20 08:54:14 2001 -0700 Received: from amos.gf.gospelcom.net ([65.7.166.164]) by femail46.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP id <20010920155409.MBWW15842.femail46.sdc1.sfba.home.com@amos.gf.gospelcom.net>; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:54:09 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:54:07 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Joel Boonstra To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pine 4.40 question In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Eduardo Chappa X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: joel@amos.gf.gospelcom.net X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Eduardo, > This change is not documented in the release notes, but in the definition > of the token SIZE: > > SIZE > This token represents the total size, in bytes, of the message. > If a "K" (Kilobyte) follows the number, the size is approximately > 1,000 times that many bytes (rounded to the nearest 1,000). If an > "M" (Megabyte) follows the number, the size is approximately > 1,000,000 times that many bytes. But that's not really a change from the last documentation, just an addition. Here's what 4.33 says: SIZE This token represents the total size, in bytes, of the message. So the difference is that it explains what the 'K' and the 'M' next to the message size means. I'm not sure if 4.33 used the 'M', as I don't routinely get multi-megabyte messages. However, I know that 4.33 used the 'K' to represent the size in kilobytes, so the documentation above would be true for 4.33, as well. The documentation doesn't indicate any sort of a pattern as to the presentation of the size, just that if you see a 'K', it means Kilobytes. Again, I'm harping on a pretty small point, but I was used to seeing my message sizes one way, and they're different now. I can probably eventually deal with change, but believe it or not, it's throwing me off right now. Maybe I'm just crazy... -- [ joel boonstra | jboonstra@gospelcom.net ] From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 09:36:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8KGaZi26060 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 09:36:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 20 09:36:33 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8KGaXW05538; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 09:36:33 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8KGaBs17242; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 09:36:11 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8KGYLN121796 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 09:34:22 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8KGYLv09387 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 09:34:21 -0700 Received: FROM euler.math.washington.edu BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 20 09:34:20 2001 -0700 Received: from goedel3.math.washington.edu (goedel3.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.12]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8KGYIP379616; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 09:34:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 09:34:18 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pine 4.40 question In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Joel Boonstra X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Joel Boonstra (jboonstra@gospelcom.net) wrote today: :) But that's not really a change from the last documentation, just an :) addition. Here's what 4.33 says: :) :) SIZE :) This token represents the total size, in bytes, of the message. :) :) So the difference is that it explains what the 'K' and the 'M' next to the :) message size means. I also noticed the difference, I tested pre-releases and noticed the change a few weeks ago. I thought it was a bug, because there is a new token called KSIZE, which expresses everything in terms of kilobytes, but then I went and read the documentation and noticed that the change was documented, so it was not a bug. I didn't like it either. I hope you can convince the right people to change it back. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:14:50 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8KHEmi03460 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:14:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 20 10:14:45 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8KHEiW07259; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:14:44 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8KHDeA10982; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:13:40 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8KHA7N125578 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:10:07 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8KHA7v26022 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:10:07 -0700 Received: FROM femail33.sdc1.sfba.home.com BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 20 10:10:07 2001 -0700 Received: from amos.gf.gospelcom.net ([65.7.166.164]) by femail33.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP id <20010920171001.PCLB10595.femail33.sdc1.sfba.home.com@amos.gf.gospelcom.net>; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:10:01 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:09:58 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Joel Boonstra To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pine 4.40 question In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Eduardo Chappa X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: joel@amos.gf.gospelcom.net X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN > I also noticed the difference, I tested pre-releases and noticed the > change a few weeks ago. I thought it was a bug, because there is a new > token called KSIZE, which expresses everything in terms of kilobytes, but > then I went and read the documentation and noticed that the change was > documented, so it was not a bug. I didn't like it either. I hope you can > convince the right people to change it back. I can submit a bug report, but as you say, it's not a bug. Would 'the right people' be lurking anywhere on this list? If not, what's the best route to suggest a change? Joel -- [ joel boonstra | jboonstra@gospelcom.net ] From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:21:02 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8KHKxi07797 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 20 10:20:58 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8KHKvA28978; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:20:57 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8KHKMK31026; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:20:22 -0700 Received: from mxu102.u.washington.edu (mxu102.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8KHHFN14118 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:17:15 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by mxu102.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8KHHFE09047 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:17:15 -0700 Received: FROM euler.math.washington.edu BY mxu2.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 20 10:17:14 2001 -0700 Received: from goedel3.math.washington.edu (goedel3.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.12]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8KHHDP413560; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:17:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:17:13 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pine 4.40 question In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Joel Boonstra X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Joel Boonstra (jboonstra@gospelcom.net) wrote today: :) I can submit a bug report, but as you say, it's not a bug. Would 'the :) right people' be lurking anywhere on this list? If not, what's the best :) route to suggest a change? Yes, the right people are reading the list. By the way, you have my support, so I guess it makes it two votes :). -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:45:19 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8KIjFi01552 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:45:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 20 11:45:11 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8KIjBA00329; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:45:11 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8KIi8s25406; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:44:08 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8KIfBN120716 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:41:11 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8KIfBx23291 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:41:11 -0700 Received: FROM mxout2.cac.washington.edu BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 20 11:41:10 2001 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.12]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8KIfAs18825 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:41:10 -0700 Received: from [128.95.135.225] (D-128-95-135-225.dhcp.washington.edu [128.95.135.225]) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.0+UW01.09/8.12.0+UW01.09) with ESMTP id f8KIfAhl023444 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:41:10 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:41:10 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pine 4.40 question In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: hubert@shivams.cac.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN We'll add back a size token which includes commas for 4.41. Thanks. -- Steve Hubert Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 18:19:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8L1Jli17022 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 18:19:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 20 18:19:46 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8L1JjA18594; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 18:19:45 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8L1Ifs31174; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 18:18:41 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8L1HBN26194 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 18:17:12 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8L1HB709778 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 18:17:11 -0700 Received: FROM esther.su.ualberta.ca BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 20 18:17:10 2001 -0700 Received: from esther.su.ualberta.ca (esther.su.ualberta.ca [129.128.133.135]) by esther.su.ualberta.ca (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f8L1LxO72750 for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 19:21:59 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from dan@lazin.ca) Message-Id: <20010920191636.D72743-100000@esther.su.ualberta.ca> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 19:21:59 -0600 (MDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Dan Lazin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: bounced messages come from bouncer, not original sender MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, all. I've seen this answered somewhere, but can't find the response for the life of me. I'm running pine 4.33 and have enabled bounce-cmd and the aggregate commands. When I bounce messages, however, they show up as having been sent by me, not by the original sender. As well, full headers are appended, including info about me bouncing the message. I would prefer if these facts were not so. I recall that this is a problem with sendmail. Could you please tell me what the issue is? I'm running sendmail 8.11.1 on FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE. Thanks, friends. Dan Lazin Edmonton, Alberta, Canada -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:13:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8M6DPi13754 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:13:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 21 23:13:21 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8M6DKW13454; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:13:20 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8M6CbA09966; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:12:37 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8M649N61514 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:04:10 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8M648715808 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 23:04:09 -0700 Received: FROM aslan.narnia.pp.se BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 21 23:04:08 2001 -0700 Received: from localhost (dufberg@localhost) by aslan.narnia.pp.se (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8M643J68361; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 08:04:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dufberg@narnia.pp.se) Message-Id: <20010922075731.A65070-100000@aslan.narnia.pp.se> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 08:04:03 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: Pine Discussion Forum Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mats Dufberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: bounced messages come from bouncer, not original sender In-Reply-To: <20010920191636.D72743-100000@esther.su.ualberta.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-To: Dan Lazin X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Dan Lazin wrote: > I'm running pine 4.33 and have enabled bounce-cmd and the aggregate > commands. When I bounce messages, however, they show up as having been > sent by me, not by the original sender. As well, full headers are > appended, including info about me bouncing the message. I would prefer if > these facts were not so. When I try with 4.33 it does it as pine always has done it. It adds the following headers, Resent-Date, Resent-From, Resent-To, and Resent-Subject. If they are shown is a matter for the final recepient. Have you tried to read the bounced message in pine? You could bounce to yourself. > I recall that this is a problem with sendmail. Could you please tell me > what the issue is? I'm running sendmail 8.11.1 on FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE. I would no think that sendmail in normal configuration would change anything of it, but sendmail is a Swiss army knife. You could have it change a lot of things. Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg dufberg@narnia.pp.se Bl=E5arvsgr=E4nd 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 V=E4llingby, Sweden +46-709-17 48 42 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 02:14:47 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8M9Eji26153 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 02:14:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Sep 22 02:14:44 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8M9EhW16801; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 02:14:43 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8M9EPA29798; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 02:14:25 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8M955N125798 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 02:05:05 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8M955706790 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 02:05:05 -0700 Received: FROM esther.su.ualberta.ca BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Sat Sep 22 02:05:04 2001 -0700 Received: from [129.128.238.245] (async15-12.remote.ualberta.ca [129.128.238.245]) by esther.su.ualberta.ca (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f8M99pO75592 for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 03:09:51 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from dan@lazin.ca) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 03:04:40 -0600 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Dan Lazin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: bounced messages come from bouncer, not original sender In-Reply-To: <20010922075731.A65070-100000@aslan.narnia.pp.se> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Thanks, Mat. I've tried again, and bounced a message to myself: sure enough= , the full headers, plus the four new bounce headers, show up. This is despit= e the fact that I normally only see the standard headers. But that's not the more important problem: that is that every message I bounce shows up as being from me, not from the original sender, and they have no subject line. I've tried this on another server to which I have access (but which I did not set up), and, as I remembered, bounce worked predictably. Bounced messages showed up just as they did when I first got them from the original sender. Furthermore, I only saw the normal headers (although the extra four headers are available if I decided to view all headers). Anyone else have any ideas? I *know* that I saw a message about this a few days ago, somewhere, but I can't find it. I'm sure that the message said it was sendmail-related. Sendmail (8.11.1 on FreeBSD 4.2) is set up as it normally ships with FreeBSD with the one added feature of sending all mail addressed to nonexistent users to me (instead of returning it to sender). Dan > From: Mats Dufberg > Reply-To: Pine Discussion Forum > Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 08:04:03 +0200 (CEST) > To: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: Re: bounced messages come from bouncer, not original sender >=20 > On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Dan Lazin wrote: >=20 >> I'm running pine 4.33 and have enabled bounce-cmd and the aggregate >> commands. When I bounce messages, however, they show up as having been >> sent by me, not by the original sender. As well, full headers are >> appended, including info about me bouncing the message. I would prefer i= f >> these facts were not so. >=20 > When I try with 4.33 it does it as pine always has done it. It adds the > following headers, Resent-Date, Resent-From, Resent-To, and > Resent-Subject. If they are shown is a matter for the final recepient. > Have you tried to read the bounced message in pine? You could bounce to > yourself. >=20 >> I recall that this is a problem with sendmail. Could you please tell me >> what the issue is? I'm running sendmail 8.11.1 on FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE. >=20 > I would no think that sendmail in normal configuration would change > anything of it, but sendmail is a Swiss army knife. You could have it > change a lot of things. >=20 >=20 > Mats >=20 > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Mats Dufberg dufberg@narnia.pp.se > Bl=E5arvsgr=E4nd 42 +46-8-38 48 59 > SE-162 45 V=E4llingby, Sweden +46-709-17 48 42 >=20 >=20 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:05:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8OK5Li06877 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:05:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 24 13:05:19 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8OK5JA17247; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:05:19 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8OJnIs17258; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:49:18 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8OJj8N99130 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:45:12 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8OJj7x07781 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:45:07 -0700 Received: FROM Malad.PerfectGenius.Com BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 24 12:45:02 2001 -0700 Received: from localhost (adam@localhost) by Malad.PerfectGenius.Com (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with ESMTP id f8OJk5u4009477 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:46:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:46:04 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Adam To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine and IMAP Crashing on message In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-559023410-851401618-1001360764=:9476" X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. ---559023410-851401618-1001360764=:9476 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII When reciving any mail like this, pine crashes and core dumps i don't know much about gdb, but: GNU gdb 5.0 Copyright 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "sparc-sun-solaris2.8"... (gdb) run Starting program: /export/home/adam/pine4.40/bin/pine [[[read attached message]]] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.g 0x160830 in format_size_guess (body=0x518770) at mailview.c:1260 1260 size = format_size_guess(body->nested.msg->body); (gdb) Pine 4.4 on Solaris 8 SS10 Built with SSL SunOS NewWB 5.8 Generic_108528-05 sun4m sparc SUNW,SPARCstation-10 Pine 4.40 built Mon Sep 24 09:34:19 EDT 2001 on NewWB Anything would help! thanks! ---559023410-851401618-1001360764=:9476 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name=test Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=test IyEvdXNyL2Jpbi9wZXJsDQpwcmludCAkKjsNCnByaW50ICJcbiI7DQo= ---559023410-851401618-1001360764=:9476-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:37:38 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8OKbai15011 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:37:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 24 13:37:35 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8OKbZA18591; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:37:35 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8OKaiK35924; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:36:44 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8OKYLN63184 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:34:21 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8OKYLv05083 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:34:21 -0700 Received: FROM vax.hanford.org BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 24 13:34:20 2001 -0700 Received: (qmail 16159 invoked by uid 1828); 24 Sep 2001 20:34:19 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Expunge taking much longer on 4.40? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I probably have something set up incorrectly.. or didn't modify something I needed to before compiling. But I have both 4.33 and 4.40 running on Mac OS X. pine 4.33's expunging is essentially instantaneous. pine 4.40's expunging takes several seconds. Under both I expunged a message at around ~1400 in out of around 2100 messages, on an IMAP server. Both tests were done with the same configuration, right after each other (and I didn't have both copies of pine running at the same time). All I did today was download 4.40, change the OPTIMIZE in the pine osx makefile to -O3, and compile.. (and I'm running the binaries in the build folder until I install them). -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:11:52 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8OLBfi09027 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:11:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 24 14:11:37 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8OLBbW26712; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:11:37 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8OLAZA18506; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:10:35 -0700 Received: from mxu102.u.washington.edu (mxu102.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8OL84N20636 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:08:04 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by mxu102.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8OL83E03708 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:08:03 -0700 Received: FROM mxout1.cac.washington.edu BY mxu2.u.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 24 14:08:03 2001 -0700 Received: from mailhost1.u.washington.edu (mailhost1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.2]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8OL83e04199; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:08:03 -0700 Received: from [10.95.135.31] (fw135.cac.washington.edu [128.95.135.30]) by mailhost1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8OL83P31308; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:08:03 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:08:03 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jeff Franklin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Expunge taking much longer on 4.40? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Matt Ackeret X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: jpf@shivams.cac.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Matt Ackeret wrote: > > I probably have something set up incorrectly.. or didn't modify > something I needed to before compiling. > > But I have both 4.33 and 4.40 running on Mac OS X. > > pine 4.33's expunging is essentially instantaneous. > > pine 4.40's expunging takes several seconds. Hmm... Off the top of my head, do you have filters set? On expunge, pine 4.40 checks filters to see if any messages should get filtered. Jeff -- Jeff Franklin Networks and Distributed Computing University of Washington From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8OLbNi10421 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:37:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 24 14:37:21 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8OLbKA21424; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:37:20 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8OLaYs35290; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:36:34 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8OLYXN120552 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:34:33 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8OLYWx18160 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:34:32 -0700 Received: FROM mstr.rh.edu BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 24 14:34:32 2001 -0700 Received: from mstr.rh.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mstr.rh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/RHGC-1.17d) with ESMTP id RAA09775 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:34:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from du3.rh.edu (du3.rh.edu [129.5.128.15]) by mstr.rh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/RHGC-1.17i) with ESMTP id RAA09771 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:34:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (roma4386@localhost) by du3.rh.edu (8.9.3+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA10446 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:34:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:34:27 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: alexandru roman To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: smtp auth MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: du3.rh.edu: roma4386 owned process doing -bs X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Are there plans to support smtp authentication in pine, if it doesn't already ? I'm trying to setting up pine to send mail out through an exchange server. By default : smtp-server=mail.server.com this returns : [Mail not sent: .7.1 Unable to relay for dest-email] I've seen undocumented suggestions for using the following syntax : smtp-server=mail.server.com/user=username I'm not sure where the password would be specified... but that returns : [>SMTP Authentication cancelled<] so I assume its not supported. thanks, Alex. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:20:11 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8P0K9i23484 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:20:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 24 17:20:08 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8P0K7W02665; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:20:07 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8P0Jor32836; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:19:50 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8P05JN100422 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:05:20 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8P05Jx28962 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:05:19 -0700 Received: FROM vax.hanford.org BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 24 17:05:19 2001 -0700 Received: (qmail 13242 invoked by uid 1828); 25 Sep 2001 00:05:18 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:05:18 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Expunge taking much longer on 4.40? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Jeff Franklin wrote: >On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Matt Ackeret wrote: >> I probably have something set up incorrectly.. or didn't modify >> something I needed to before compiling. >> >> But I have both 4.33 and 4.40 running on Mac OS X. >> >> pine 4.33's expunging is essentially instantaneous. >> >> pine 4.40's expunging takes several seconds. > >Hmm... Off the top of my head, do you have filters set? On expunge, pine >4.40 checks filters to see if any messages should get filtered. This appears to be the problem. I did have a filter rule (based upon AllText) to move messages into a suspected_spam folder. I was at a Cocoa class last week, so had more than 600 new messages today. So in my particular case, I could just delete the unneeded rule. I still think this is a disturbing slowdown however. From effectively instantaneous to around 7 seconds to expunge, with everything else the same. My rule was only based upon NEW messages too. Doesn't pine remember to see if it has touched a particular message before? or does it truly only use the same new attribute that I see with the N? I would hope it would only run a rule ONCE upon each particular message. (Or maybe that could be a new category -- run only once upon arrival in the box) From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 21:33:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8P4Xki16904 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 21:33:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 24 21:33:45 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8P4XiW09369; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 21:33:44 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8P4W7K07162; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 21:32:07 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8P4HVN99594 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 21:17:31 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8P4HV723036 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 21:17:31 -0700 Received: FROM Malad.PerfectGenius.Com BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Mon Sep 24 21:17:29 2001 -0700 Received: from localhost (adam@localhost) by Malad.PerfectGenius.Com (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with ESMTP id f8P4IWQw011412 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:18:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:18:17 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Adam To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine and IMAP Crashing on message (moreinfo) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/Mixed; BOUNDARY="-559023410-851401618-1001360764=:9476" Content-ID: X-To: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. ---559023410-851401618-1001360764=:9476 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-ID: More on this... well, this is comming with SmartList and a script called moderator (attatched) Now, sending it to the server mentioned below crashes it but sending to a server thats identical to it (besides processor) works... both same cc, libs, os Thanks! ---559023410-851401618-1001360764=:9476 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name=moderate Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=moderate IyEvdXNyL2Jpbi9wZXJsIC13DQoNCiMgbW9kZXJhdGUgVE9ETw0KIyAgIHNo b3VsZCBoYW5kbGUgbXVsdGlwbGUgbW9kZXJhdG9ycyB3aXRob3V0IGVycm9y cyENCiMgICB2YXJpYWJsZSB0byBoYW5kbGUgZGVmYXVsdCBhcHByb3ZlIG9y IGRpc2NhcmQNCiMgICBjb25maWd1cmF0aW9uIGZpbGUhDQoNCnJlcXVpcmUg NS4wMDM7DQp1c2Ugc3RyaWN0Ow0KDQojICRJZDogbW9kZXJhdGUsdiAxLjE1 IDE5OTcvMTIvMDkgMTA6MDg6MTQgbGJyIEV4cCAkDQoNCiMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIw0KIw0KIyAgSU5GT1JNQVRJT04NCiMNCiMgICAg UHJvZ3JhbTogTW9kZXJhdGUgLSBhbiBhbHRlcm5hdGl2ZSBzeXN0ZW0gZm9y IG1vZGVyYXRlZCBTbWFydExpc3QgDQojICAgICAgICAgICAgIG1haWxpbmcg bGlzdHMuDQojDQojICAgIFZlcnNpb246IDIuMC4xNQ0KIw0KIyAgICBQdXJw b3NlOiBUbyBwcm92aWRlIGFuIGVhc3ktdG8tdXNlIHdheSBmb3IgbGlzdCBt b2RlcmF0b3JzIHRvDQojICAgICAgICAgICAgIG1hbmFnZSB0aGVpciBsaXN0 cy4NCiMNCiMgICAgICAgICBCeTogQ3JhaWcgVy4gSGFuc2VuIChjcmFpZ0Bu ZXRjZW50cmFsLm5ldCkNCiMgICAgICAgICAgICAgTmV0Q2VudHJhbCwgSW5j LiAoaHR0cDovL3d3dy5uZXRjZW50cmFsLm5ldC8pDQojDQojICAgICAyLjAg Ynk6IExhcnMgQmFsa2VyIFJhc211c3NlbiAobGJyQG1qb2xuZXIuZGspDQoj ICAgICAgICAgICAgIE1qb2xuZXIgSW5mb3JtYXRpY3MgQXBTIChodHRwOi8v d3d3Lm1qb2xuZXIuZGsvKQ0KIw0KIyAgICAgICBIVFRQOiBodHRwOi8vd3d3 Lm1qb2xuZXIuZGsvfmxici9tb2RlcmF0ZS8NCiMNCiMgICAgU3VwcG9ydDog U3Vic2NyaWJlIHRvIHRoZSBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3Q6IA0KIyAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgbW9kZXJhdGUtcmVxdWVzdEBuZXRjZW50cmFsLm5ldA0KIw0KIyAg ICBMaWNlbnNlOiBDb3B5cmlnaHQgMTk5NyBOZXRDZW50cmFsLCBJbmMuDQoj ICAgICAgICAgICAgIFRoaXMgc29mdHdhcmUgaXMgcmVsZWFzZWQgdW5kZXIg dGhlIEdOVSBHZW5lcmFsIFB1YmxpYyANCiMgICAgICAgICAgICAgTGljZW5z ZS4gIEl0IG1heSBiZSBmcmVlbHkgcmVkaXN0cmlidXRlZC4NCiMNCiMgRGlz Y2xhaW1lcjoNCiMgICAgICAgICAgICAgVEhJUyBTT0ZUV0FSRSBJUyBQUk9W SURFRCBCWSBORVRDRU5UUkFMLCBJTkMgQU5EIENPTlRSSUJVVE9SUw0KIyAg ICAgICAgICAgICAnQVMgSVMnIEFORCBBTlkgRVhQUkVTUyBPUiBJTVBMSUVE IFdBUlJBTlRJRVMsIElOQ0xVRElORywNCiMgICAgICAgICAgICAgQlVUIE5P VCBMSU1JVEVEIFRPLCBUSEUgSU1QTElFRCBXQVJSQU5USUVTIE9GIE1FUkNI QU5UQUJJTElUWQ0KIyAgICAgICAgICAgICBBTkQgRklUTkVTUyBGT1IgQSBQ QVJUSUNVTEFSIFBVUlBPU0UgQVJFIERJU0NMQUlNRUQuICBJTiBOTw0KIyAg ICAgICAgICAgICBFVkVOVCBTSEFMTCBORVRDRU5UUkFMLCBJTkMgT1IgQ09O VFJJQlVUT1JTIEJFIExJQUJMRSBGT1IgQU5ZDQojICAgICAgICAgICAgIERJ UkVDVCwgSU5ESVJFQ1QsIElOQ0lERU5UQUwsIFNQRUNJQUwsIEVYRU1QTEFS WSwgT1INCiMgICAgICAgICAgICAgQ09OU0VRVUVOVElBTCBEQU1BR0VTIChJ TkNMVURJTkcsIEJVVCBOT1QgTElNSVRFRCBUTywNCiMgICAgICAgICAgICAg UFJPQ1VSRU1FTlQgT0YgU1VCU1RJVFVURSBHT09EUyBPUiBTRVJWSUNFUzsg TE9TUyBPRiBVU0UsDQojICAgICAgICAgICAgIERBVEEsIE9SIFBST0ZJVFM7 IE9SIEJVU0lORVNTIElOVEVSUlVQVElPTikgSE9XRVZFUiBDQVVTRUQNCiMg ICAgICAgICAgICAgQU5EIE9OIEFOWSBUSEVPUlkgT0YgTElBQklMSVRZLCBX SEVUSEVSIElOIENPTlRSQUNULCBTVFJJQ1QNCiMgICAgICAgICAgICAgTElB QklMSVRZLCBPUiBUT1JUIChJTkNMVURJTkcgTkVHTElHRU5DRSBPUiBPVEhF UldJU0UpDQojICAgICAgICAgICAgIEFSSVNJTkcgSU4gQU5ZIFdBWSBPVVQg T0YgVEhFIFVTRSBPRiBUSElTIFNPRlRXQVJFLCBFVkVOIElGDQojICAgICAg ICAgICAgIEFEVklTRUQgT0YgVEhFIFBPU1NJQklMSVRZIE9GIFNVQ0ggREFN QUdFLg0KIw0KIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjDQoNCiMjIyMj IyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIw0KIw0KIyAgRkVBVFVSRVM6DQojDQoj ICAgICAgICAgIG8gIE5vIFgtQ29tbWFuZHMhDQojICAgICAgICAgIG8gIE5v IFByb2NtYWlsIHJlY2lwZSBlZGl0aW5nIG9yIFNtYXJ0TGlzdCBwYXRjaGVz Lg0KIyAgICAgICAgICBvICBMaXN0cyBjYW4gYmUgbW9kZXJhdGVkIGZyb20g YW55IGVtYWlsIGFkZHJlc3MuDQojICAgICAgICAgIG8gIEFwcHJvdmUgb3Ig ZGlzY2FyZCBwb3N0cy4NCiMgICAgICAgICAgbyAgUmVqZWN0IHBvc3RzLCB3 aXRoIGFuIGV4cGxhbmF0aW9uIHRvIHRoZSBzZW5kZXIuDQojICAgICAgICAg IG8gIEFkZCBjb21tZW50cyB0byBwb3N0cy4NCiMgICAgICAgICAgbyAgU3Vi c2NyaWJlIGFuZCBVbnN1YnNjcmliZSBzZW5kZXJzLg0KIyAgICAgICAgICBv ICBUcnVlIG11bHRpcGxlIG1vZGVyYXRvciBzdXBwb3J0Lg0KIyAgICAgICAg ICBvICBFeHBsaWNpdCBtb2RlcmF0b3IgaW5zdHJ1Y3Rpb25zIGdpdmVuIHdp dGggZXZlcnkgcG9zdC4NCiMgICAgICAgICAgbyAgQXV0by1kZXRlY3Qgc3Vi c2NyaWJlLCB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSwgYW5kIGFyY2hpdmUgcmVxdWVzdHMuDQoj ICAgICAgICAgIG8gIE1JTUUgc3VwcG9ydCBmb3IgYXR0YWNobWVudHMuDQoj ICAgICAgICAgIG8gIFN5bnRheCBlcnJvcnMgcmVwb3J0ZWQuDQojICAgICAg ICAgIG8gIE1vZGVyYXRvciBmb3JnZXJ5IGVsaW1pbmF0ZWQuDQojICAgICAg ICAgIG8gIFNlY3VyZTogU21hcnRMaXN0IHBhc3N3b3JkcyBhcmUgbm90IHVz ZWQuDQojDQojIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMNCg0KIyMjIyMj IyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjDQojDQojICBJTlNUQUxMOiAxLiBFZGl0 IHRoZSBhcHByb3ByaWF0ZSBERUZJTklUSU9OUyBpbiB0aGlzIHByb2dyYW0g YmVsb3cuDQojDQojICAgICAgICAgICAyLiBFZGl0IC9ldGMvZ3JvdXAgdG8g YWRkICdiaW4nIChvciB3aGF0ZXZlciB1c2VyIHlvdXINCiMgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICBzZW5kbWFpbCBydW5zIGFzIHdoZW4gcHJvY2Vzc2luZyBhbGlhc2Vz KSB0byB0aGUgZ3JvdXAgDQojICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgJ2xpc3QnIChvciB3 aGF0ZXZlciBncm91cCB5b3VyIFNtYXJ0TGlzdCB1c2VyIGJlbG9uZ3MgdG8p Lg0KIw0KIyAgICAgICAgICAgMy4gQ29weSB0aGlzIHByb2dyYW0gaW50byBT bWFydExpc3QncyB+Ly5iaW4gZGlyZWN0b3J5Lg0KIw0KIyAgICAgICAgICAg NC4gU2V0IHRoZSBwZXJtaXNzaW9ucyBmb3IgdGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIChyZXBs YWNlICJsaXN0Lmxpc3QiDQojICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgd2l0aCB0aGUgdXNl ciBhbmQgZ3JvdXAgb2YgeW91ciBTbWFydExpc3QgdXNlcik6DQojDQojICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBjaG1vZCA3NzUgbW9kZXJhdGUNCiMgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGNob3duIGxpc3QgbW9kZXJhdGUNCiMgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGNoZ3JwIGxpc3QgbW9kZXJhdGUNCiMNCiMg ICAgICAgICAgIDUuIEVkaXQgeW91ciAvZXRjL2FsaWFzZXMgZmlsZSBhbmQg Y2hhbmdlIHRoZSBlbnRyeSBmb3INCiMgICAgICAgICAgICAgICB0aGUgbGlz dCB5b3Ugd2FudCB0byBtb2RlcmF0ZSBsaWtlIHRoaXM6DQojDQojICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgQ2hhbmdlOg0KIyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHRlc3Qt bGlzdDogInxleGVjIC9ob21lL2xpc3QvLmJpbi9mbGlzdCB0ZXN0LWxpc3Qi DQojICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgVG86DQojICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg dGVzdC1saXN0OiAifGV4ZWMgL2hvbWUvbGlzdC8uYmluL21vZGVyYXRlIHRl c3QtbGlzdCINCiMNCiMgICAgICAgICAgICAgTk9URVM6IC0gT05MWSBjaGFu Z2UgdGhlIExJU1QgZW50cnksIE5PVCB0aGUgLXJlcXVlc3QgZW50cnkuDQoj ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAtIFRoaXMgcHJvZ3JhbSBhc3N1bWVzIHRo YXQgeW91IHVzZSBjaG9wbGlzdCB3L2ZsaXN0DQojICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICBhbmQgdGhhdCB5b3UgZG8gbm90IHVzZSB0aGUgLWRpc3QgbWV0 aG9kIHRvIHBvc3QuDQojICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAtIFRyeSB0aGlz IGZpcnN0IG9uIGEgVEVTVCBMSVNUIHRvIGdldCBpdCB3b3JraW5nIQ0KIw0K IyAgICAgICAgICAgNi4gUnVuICJuZXdhbGlhc2VzIg0KIw0KIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjDQoNCiMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjIw0KIw0KIyBPUEVSQVRJT046IA0KIw0KIyAgICAgICAgICBBbGwgZW1h aWxzIHNlbnQgdG8gdGhlIGxpc3QgYWRkcmVzcyBhcmUgYXNzaWduZWQgYSB1 bmlxdWUsDQojICAgICAgICAgIHJhbmRvbWx5LWdlbmVyYXRlZCBwYXNzY29k ZSBhbmQgc2F2ZWQgaW4gYSBxdWV1ZSBkaXJlY3RvcnkuDQojICAgICAgICAg IFRoZSBxdWV1ZSBkaXJlY3RvcnkgaXMgY3JlYXRlZCBpZiBpdCBkb2Vzbid0 IGV4aXN0Lg0KIyAgICAgICAgICAofi9saXN0X25hbWUvbW9kZXJhdGUvKQ0K IyAgICAgICAgICANCiMgICAgICAgICAgSWYgYSAibW9kZXJhdG9ycyIgZmls ZSBleGlzdHMgZm9yIHRoZSBsaXN0LCBhIGNvcHkgb2YgdGhlIA0KIyAgICAg ICAgICBwb3N0IHdpbGwgYmUgc2VudCB0byBldmVyeSBtb2RlcmF0b3IuICBP dGhlcndpc2UsDQojICAgICAgICAgIGl0IHdpbGwgYmUgc2VudCB0byB0aGUg bGlzdCAibWFpbnRhaW5lciIgYXMgc3BlY2lmaWVkIGluIA0KIyAgICAgICAg ICB0aGUgbGlzdCdzICJyYy5jdXN0b20iIGZpbGUuICBUaGUgbWVzc2FnZSBj b250YWlucyANCiMgICAgICAgICAgaW5zdHJ1Y3Rpb25zIHRvIGVpdGhlciBB UFBST1ZFIG9yIERJU0NBUkRJTkcgdGhlIG1lc3NhZ2UuDQojICAgICAgICAg IENPTU1BTkRzIHRvIHRoZSBtb2RlcmF0ZSBwcm9ncmFtIGFyZSBzZW50IGlu IHRoZSBTdWJqZWN0IA0KIyAgICAgICAgICBsaW5lIG9mIHRoZSBtZXNzYWdl LiAgDQojICAgICAgICAgIA0KIyAgICAgICAgICBNb2RlcmF0ZSBwcmUtZm9y bWF0cyB0aGUgU3ViamVjdCBvZiBpdHMgbm90aWZpY2F0aW9uIA0KIyAgICAg ICAgICBtZXNzYWdlcyBzbyBhIG1vZGVyYXRvciBvbmx5IG5lZWRzIHRvIHJl cGx5IHRvIHRoZSBwb3N0IHRvDQojICAgICAgICAgIEFQUFJPVkUgaXQuICBB bnkgbGVhZGluZyAiUmU6ICIgdGV4dCBpbiB0aGUgU3ViamVjdCB3aWxsIA0K IyAgICAgICAgICBiZSBpZ25vcmVkLCBhcyB3aWxsIHRoZSBib2R5IG9mIHRo ZSBtZXNzYWdlLg0KIyAgICAgICAgICANCiMgICAgICAgICAgVGhlIHN5bnRh eCBvZiB0aGUgY29tbWFuZCBpczoNCiMgICAgICAgICAgDQojICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgIENPTU1BTkQgQVBQUk9WRSA4NTY0NDc3MzIzOTIxDQojICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgb3INCiMgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg Q09NTUFORCBESVNDQVJEIDg1NjQ0NzczMjM5MjENCiMgICAgICAgICAgDQoj ICAgICAgICAgIE1vZGVyYXRlIHRoZW4gZXhlY3V0ZXMgdGhhdCBjb21tYW5k LCBzZW5kaW5nIGFueSBlcnJvciANCiMgICAgICAgICAgbWVzc2FnZXMgdG8g dGhlIGxpc3QgbWFpbnRhaW5lci4gIElmIHRoZSBwb3N0IGlzIGFwcHJvdmVk LA0KIyAgICAgICAgICBpdCBpcyBwaXBlZCBpbnRvIFNtYXJ0TGlzdCdzICJm bGlzdCIgYW5kIHByb2Nlc3NlZCBhcyB1c3VhbC4NCiMgICAgICAgICAgSWYg aXQgaXMgZGlzY2FyZGVkLCBNb2RlcmF0ZSB3aWxsIGRlbGV0ZSB0aGUgbWVz c2FnZSBmcm9tIGl0cw0KIyAgICAgICAgICBxdWV1ZS4NCiMNCiMgTkVXIENP TU1BTkRTIEZPUiBWRVJTSU9OIDEuMjoNCiMNCiMgICAgICAgICAgUmVwbGFj ZSAiQVBQUk9WRSIgaW4gdGhlIGFib3ZlIGV4YW1wbGUgd2l0aCBhbnkgb2Yg dGhlc2U6DQojDQojICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIFNVQiAgICAgIC0gU3Vic2Ny aWJlcyB0aGUgc2VuZGVyDQojICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIFVOU1VCICAgIC0g VW5zdWJzY3JpYmVzIHRoZSBzZW5kZXINCiMgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgQ09N TUVOVCAgLSBQb3N0IHdpbGwgYmUgYXBwcm92ZWQsIGFuZCB0aGUgYm9keSBv ZiB0aGUNCiMgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBhcHByb3ZhbCBw b3N0IHdpbGwgYmUgYWRkZWQgYXMgYSBjb21tZW50DQojICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgZnJvbSB0aGUgTW9kZXJhdG9yLg0KIyAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICBSRUpFQ1QgICAtIFBvc3Qgd2lsbCBiZSBkaXNjYXJkZWQsIGFu ZCB0aGUgYm9keSBvZiB0aGUNCiMgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICBtb2RlcmF0b3IncyB0ZXh0IHdpbGwgYmUgc2VudCB0byB0aGUNCiMgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBzZW5kZXIgYXMgYW4gZXhwbGFuYXRp b24uDQojDQojIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMNCg0KIyMjIyMj IyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjDQojDQojICBDSEFOR0VTOg0KIyANCiMg IHYyLjAgICAgR2VuZXJhbCBjbGVhbnVwLg0KIw0KIyAgdjEuMiAgICBBZGRl ZCBNSU1FIHN1cHBvcnQgZm9yIG1vZGVyYXRvciBub3RpZmljYXRpb25zLiAg Tm93LCB5b3UgDQojICAgICAgICAgIGNhbiB2aWV3IGF0dGFjaG1lbnRzIGlu IHBvc3RzIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0IGJlZm9yZSB0aGV5IGFyZQ0KIyAgICAgICAg ICBhcHByb3ZlZC4NCiMNCiMgICAgICAgICAgQWRkZWQgYXV0by1kZXRlY3Rp bmcgb2Ygc3Vic2NyaWJlLCB1bnN1YnNjcmliZSwgYW5kIA0KIyAgICAgICAg ICBhcmNoaXZlIHJlcXVlc3RzLiAgU3VjaCBwb3N0cyBhcmUgcmVkaXJlY3Rl ZCB0byB0aGUgDQojICAgICAgICAgIGxpc3QncyAiLXJlcXVlc3QiIGFkZHJl c3NlZCBhbmQgcHJvY2Vzc2VkLg0KIw0KIyAgICAgICAgICBBZGRlZCBTVUIs IFVOU1VCLCBDT01NRU5ULCBhbmQgUkVKRUNUIGNvbW1hbmRzIGFuZCByZXZh bXBlZA0KIyAgICAgICAgICB0aGUgbW9kZXJhdG9yIGluc3RydWN0aW9ucy4N CiMNCiMgIHYxLjEgICAgVGhlIHByZXZpb3VzIHB1YmxpYyBiZXRhIHJlbGVh c2UsIHYuOWIxLCB1c2VkIGEgZGlmZmVyZW50IA0KIyAgICAgICAgICBjb21t YW5kIHN5bnRheC4gIEl0IGFsc28gdXNlZCBTbWFydExpc3QgcGFzc3dvcmRz IGZvcg0KIyAgICAgICAgICBhdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbi4gIFRoZSBuZXcgbWV0 aG9kIGlzIGVhc2llciBhbmQgbW9yZSBzZWN1cmUuDQojDQojICAgICAgICAg IEkgYWxzbyBhZGRlZCBtdWx0aXBsZSBtb2RlcmF0b3Igc3VwcG9ydCwgYmV0 dGVyIGVycm9yDQojICAgICAgICAgIGhhbmRsaW5nLCBhbmQgY29tbWFuZCBz eW50YXggY2hlY2tpbmcuDQojDQojIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMNCg0KIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjIw0KIyBERUZJTklUSU9OUyAtIEVESVQgVEhFU0UgRk9SIFlPVVIgU1lT VEVNDQojIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjDQoNCiMgUHV0IHlvdXIgZG9tYWluIGhlcmUuLi4NCm15ICRkb21haW4g ICAgICAgICA9ICJtYWlsbGlzdC5uZXQiOw0KDQojIFNtYXJ0TGlzdCdzIGhv bWUgZGlyZWN0b3J5Li4uDQpteSAkaG9tZV9kaXIgICAgICAgPSAiL2V4cG9y dC9ob21lL3NsaXN0IjsNCg0KIyBXaGVyZSBpcyBzZW5kbWFpbD8NCm15ICRz ZW5kbWFpbCAgICAgICA9ICIvdXNyL2xpYi9zZW5kbWFpbCI7DQoNCm15ICRz dXBwcmVzc19lcnJvcnMgPSAwOw0KDQojIFVuY29tZW50IHRoaXMgdG8gZGlz YWJsZSBzZW5kaW5nICJNZXNzYWdlIG5vdCBmb3VuZCIgZXJyb3JzIHRvIHRo ZSBNYWludGFpbmVyDQojICRzdXBwcmVzc19lcnJvcnMgICAgPSAiVFJVRSI7 DQoNCiMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjIw0KIyBZT1UgU0hPVUxETidUIE5FRUQgVE8gQ0hBTkdFIEFOWVRISU5H IEVMU0UNCiMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjIyMjIw0KDQpleGl0IHVubGVzcyBAQVJHVjsJCSMgbm8gbmVlZCB0byBk byBhbnl0aGluZyBpZiBubyBhcmdzIQ0KDQpteSAkdmVyc2lvbiA9ICIyLjAu MTUiOw0KDQojIERlZmluaXRlbHkgZG9uJ3QgY2hhbmdlIHRoaXMgb25lLi4u DQpteSAkbGlzdF9uYW1lCSAgICA9ICRBUkdWWzBdOw0KDQpteSAkbGlzdF9y ZXF1ZXN0ICAgID0gIiRsaXN0X25hbWUtcmVxdWVzdCI7DQpteSAkbGlzdF9k aXIJICAgID0gIiRob21lX2Rpci8kbGlzdF9uYW1lIjsNCm15ICRzcG9vbF9k aXIJICAgID0gIiRsaXN0X2Rpci9tb2RlcmF0ZSI7DQpteSAkcmNfZmlsZQkg ICAgPSAiJGxpc3RfZGlyL3JjLmN1c3RvbSI7DQpteSAkbW9kZXJhdG9yc19m aWxlID0gIiRsaXN0X2Rpci9tb2RlcmF0b3JzIjsNCm15ICRmbGlzdF9sb2MJ ICAgID0gIiRob21lX2Rpci8uYmluL2ZsaXN0IjsNCg0KIyB0aGlzIHNob3Vs ZCBwcm9iYWJseSBiZSBzb21ldGhpbmcgbW9yZSBzb3BoaXN0aWNhdGVkDQpt eSAkbWltZV9ib3VuZGFyeQkgPSAiLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLSI7DQoNCiMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjIyMjIyMNCiMgUFJPVE9UWVBFUw0KIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIw0KDQpzdWIgcXVldWVfcG9zdCgpOw0K c3ViIGNvbW1hbmRfcGFyc2UoKTsNCnN1YiBzZW5kX2Vycm9yKCQgKTsNCnN1 YiByZWplY3RfcG9zdCgkICk7DQpzdWIgbm90aWZ5KCQgKTsNCnN1YiBnZXRf bW9kZXJhdG9ycygpOw0Kc3ViIGdldF9tYWludGFpbmVyKCk7DQpzdWIgZGlz Y2FyZF9wb3N0KCQgKTsNCnN1YiBhcHByb3ZlX3Bvc3QoJCApOw0Kc3ViIHBh c3NfdG9fcmVxdWVzdCgpOw0Kc3ViIGhlbHBfdXNlcigkJCk7DQpzdWIgZ2V0 X2hlYWRlcnMoKTsNCnN1YiBnZXRfbWVzc2FnZSgpOw0Kc3ViIGdldF9tYWls ZmlsZSgkICk7DQpzdWIgY2F0bWFpbCgkICk7DQpzdWIgYXNzaWduX2lkKCk7 DQoNCiMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMNCiMgTUFJTg0KIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjIyMjIyMjIw0KDQpteSAoJG1lc3NhZ2VfaGVhZGVyLCAkbWVzc2FnZV9i b2R5KTsgIyB0aGVzZSBob2xkIHRoZSBtZXNzYWdlIHJlYWQgZnJvbSBzdGRp bg0KbXkgKCRmcm9tLCAkc3ViamVjdCk7CQkjIEltcG9ydGFudCBoZWFkZXJz IGZyb20gYWJvdmUNCg0KbXkgKCRtYWlsX2hlYWRlciwgJG1haWxfYm9keSk7 CSMgdGhlc2UgaG9sZCB0aGUgbWVzc2FnZSBmcm9tIHRoZSBkaXNrDQoNCm15 ICRjb21tZW50ID0gMDsJCSMgZGVmYXVsdCBpcyBubyBjb21tZW50DQpteSAk bnVtX21vZHNfbXNnID0gJyc7CQkjIGZpbGxlZCBvdXQgaW4gZ2V0X21vZGVy YXRvcnMNCg0KJmdldF9tZXNzYWdlOwkJCSMgR2V0IHRoZSBib2R5IGFuZCBo ZWFkZXIgb2YgdGhlIG1lc3NhZ2UNCiZnZXRfaGVhZGVyczsJCQkjIEdldCB0 aGUgaW1wb3J0YW50IGhlYWRlcnMgb2YgdGhlIG1lc3NhZ2UNCg0KaWYgKCRz dWJqZWN0ID1+IC9DT01NQU5EIC8pIHsJIyBEb2VzIHRoZSBzdWJqZWN0IGNv bnRhaW4gYSBjb21tYW5kPw0KICAgICZjb21tYW5kX3BhcnNlOwkJIyBJZiBz bywgcGFyc2UgaXQgYW5kIGV4ZWN1dGUgaXQuDQp9IA0KZWxzaWYgKCRzdWJq ZWN0ID1+IG0vc3Vic2NyaWJlL2kgIyBYWFggIGlzIHRoaXMgYSBnb29kIGlk ZWE/Pz8NCiAgICAgICB8fCAkc3ViamVjdCA9fiBtL15hcmNoaXZlJC9pIA0K ICAgICAgIHx8ICRzdWJqZWN0ID1+IG0vXmFyY2hpdmUgZ2V0L2kNCiAgICAg ICB8fCAkc3ViamVjdCA9fiBtL15hcmNoaXZlIGxzL2kNCiAgICAgICB8fCAk c3ViamVjdCA9fiBtL15hcmNoaXZlIGVncmVwL2kNCiAgICAgICB8fCAkc3Vi amVjdCA9fiBtL15hcmNoaXZlIG1heGZpbGVzL2kNCiAgICAgICB8fCAkc3Vi amVjdCA9fiBtL15hcmNoaXZlIGhlbHAvaSkgDQp7DQogICAgJnBhc3NfdG9f cmVxdWVzdDsJCSMgRGl2ZXJ0IHN1YnMgdG8gLXJlcXVlc3QgYWRkcmVzcy4N CgkJCQkjIEFsc28gZGl2ZXJ0IGFueSBhcmNoaXZlIHJlcXVlc3RzDQp9IA0K ZWxzZSB7DQogICAgJnF1ZXVlX3Bvc3Q7CQkjIE90aGVyd2lzZSwgcHV0IGl0 IGluIHRoZSBxdWV1ZS4NCn0NCg0KZXhpdDsNCg0KDQojIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj IyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjDQojIFNVQlJPVVRJTkVT DQojIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMjIyMj DQoNCnN1YiBxdWV1ZV9wb3N0KCkNCnsNCiAgICBteSAkY29kZSA9ICZhc3Np Z25faWQ7CSMgQXNzaWduIHRoaXMgcG9zdCdzIHBhc3Njb2RlDQogICAgJmNh dG1haWwoJGNvZGUpOwkJIyBQdXQgdGhlIHBvc3QgaW4gYSBxdWV1ZSBmaWxl DQogICAgJm5vdGlmeSgkY29kZSk7CQkjIFRlbGwgdGhlIGxpc3QgbW9kZXJh dG9ycyBpdCdzIHRoZXJlDQoJCQkJIyAgIGFuZCBnaXZlIHRoZW0gYSBjb3B5 IG9mIHRoZSBwb3N0Lg0KfQ0KDQpzdWIgY29tbWFuZF9wYXJzZSgpDQp7DQog ICAgIyBHZXQgdGhlIHZhcmlvdXMgcGFydHMgb2YgdGhpcyBhbGxlZ2VkIGNv bW1hbmQ6DQogICAgbXkgKCRkaXJlY3RpdmUsICRjb21tYW5kLCAkcG9zdCkg PSBzcGxpdCgiICIsJHN1YmplY3QpOw0KICAgICRwb3N0ID1+IHMvXEQvL2c7 CQkjIE1lc3NhZ2UgSUQncyBhcmUgb25seSBkaWdpdHMNCg0KICAgICMgTWFr ZSBzdXJlIHRoaXMgcmVhbGx5IGlzIGEgY29tbWFuZDoNCiAgICBpZiAoKCRk aXJlY3RpdmUgZXEgIkNPTU1BTkQiKSAmJiAkcG9zdCkgew0KCWlmICgkY29t bWFuZCBlcSAiQVBQUk9WRSIpIHsNCgkgICAgJmFwcHJvdmVfcG9zdCgkcG9z dCk7DQoJfQ0KCWVsc2lmICgkY29tbWFuZCBlcSAiRElTQ0FSRCIpIHsNCgkg ICAgJmRpc2NhcmRfcG9zdCgkcG9zdCk7DQoJfQ0KCWVsc2lmICgkY29tbWFu ZCBlcSAiUkVKRUNUIikgew0KCSAgICAkY29tbWVudCA9ICRtZXNzYWdlX2Jv ZHk7DQoJICAgICZyZWplY3RfcG9zdCgkcG9zdCk7DQoJfQ0KCWVsc2lmICgk Y29tbWFuZCBlcSAiU1VCIikgew0KCSAgICAmaGVscF91c2VyKCRwb3N0LCAi c3Vic2NyaWJlIik7DQoJfQ0KCWVsc2lmICgkY29tbWFuZCBlcSAiVU5TVUIi KSB7DQoJICAgICZoZWxwX3VzZXIoJHBvc3QsICJ1bnN1YnNjcmliZSIpOw0K CX0NCgllbHNpZiAoJGNvbW1hbmQgZXEgIkNPTU1FTlQiKSB7DQoJICAgICRj b21tZW50ID0gMTsNCgkgICAgJmFwcHJvdmVfcG9zdCgkcG9zdCk7DQoJfQ0K CWVsc2Ugew0KCSAgICAmc2VuZF9lcnJvcigiU3ludGF4IGVycm9yIGluIENP TU1BTkQuIik7ICMgQmFkIGNvbW1hbmQ/DQoJICAgIGV4aXQ7DQoJfQ0KICAg IH0NCiAgICBlbHNlIHsNCgkmcXVldWVfcG9zdDsJCSMgSXQgcmVhbGx5IHdh c24ndCBhIGNvbW1hbmQuLi4NCiAgICB9DQp9DQoNCnN1YiBzZW5kX2Vycm9y KCQgKQ0Kew0KICAgIG15ICgkZXJyb3IpID0gQF87DQogICAgbXkgJG1haW50 YWluZXIgPSAmZ2V0X21haW50YWluZXI7DQoNCiAgICBpZiAoJG1haW50YWlu ZXIpIHsNCglvcGVuKE1BSUwsICJ8JHNlbmRtYWlsIC10IC1mJGxpc3RfcmVx dWVzdFxAJGRvbWFpbiIpOw0KCXByaW50IE1BSUwgPDwiRU9GIjsNClRvOiAk bWFpbnRhaW5lcg0KUmVwbHktVG86ICRsaXN0X25hbWVcQCRkb21haW4NClN1 YmplY3Q6IFskbGlzdF9uYW1lXSBNT0RFUkFURSBFUlJPUg0KDQpNT0RFUkFU T1I6ICRmcm9tDQogICAgRVJST1I6ICRlcnJvcg0KICBDT01NQU5EOiAkc3Vi amVjdA0KDQpFT0YNCgljbG9zZSBNQUlMOw0KICAgIH0NCn0NCg0Kc3ViIHJl amVjdF9wb3N0KCQgKQ0Kew0KICAgIG15ICgkcG9zdCkgPSBAXzsNCg0KICAg IGlmICgkZnJvbSkgew0KCSZnZXRfbWFpbGZpbGUoJHBvc3QpOw0KDQoJb3Bl bihNQUlMLCAifCRzZW5kbWFpbCAtdCAtZiRsaXN0X3JlcXVlc3RcQCRkb21h aW4iKTsNCglwcmludCBNQUlMIDw8IkVPRiI7DQpUbzogJGZyb20NClN1Ympl Y3Q6IFskbGlzdF9uYW1lXSBZT1VSIFBPU1QNCg0KRU9GDQoJaWYgKCRjb21t ZW50KSB7DQoJICAgIHByaW50IE1BSUwgPDwiRU9GIjsNCj09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ0KIEEgbm90ZSBmcm9tIHRoZSBNb2RlcmF0b3IN Cj09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ0KJG1lc3NhZ2VfYm9keQ0K RU9GDQoJfQ0KCXByaW50IE1BSUwgPDwiRU9GIjsNCi0tDQpUaGUgZm9sbG93 aW5nIG1lc3NhZ2Ugd2FzIG5vdCBwb3N0ZWQgdG8gJGxpc3RfbmFtZVxAJGRv bWFpbjoNCi0tDQokbWFpbF9oZWFkZXINCiRtYWlsX2JvZHkNCkVPRg0KCWNs b3NlIE1BSUw7DQogICAgfQ0KfQ0KDQpzdWIgbm90aWZ5KCQgKQ0Kew0KICAg IG15ICgkc2VyaWFsX251bSkgPSBAXzsNCg0KICAgIG15ICRtb2RlcmF0b3Jz ID0gJmdldF9tb2RlcmF0b3JzOyAjIFJlYWQgdGhlIG1vZGVyYXRvcnMgZmls ZS4uLg0KDQogICAgaWYgKCRtb2RlcmF0b3JzKSB7DQoJb3BlbihNQUlMLCAi fCRzZW5kbWFpbCAtdCAtZiRsaXN0X3JlcXVlc3RcQCRkb21haW4iKTsNCg0K CSMgU2VuZCB0aGUgbW9kZXJhdG9ycyBhIGNvcHksIHdpdGggaGVscC4uLg0K DQoJcHJpbnQgTUFJTCA8PCJFT0YiOw0KVG86ICRtb2RlcmF0b3JzDQpSZXBs eS1UbzogJGxpc3RfbmFtZVxAJGRvbWFpbg0KU3ViamVjdDogWyRsaXN0X25h bWVdIENPTU1BTkQgQVBQUk9WRSAkc2VyaWFsX251bQ0KTUlNRS1WZXJzaW9u OiAxLjANCkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZTogbXVsdGlwYXJ0L2RpZ2VzdDsgYm91bmRh cnk9IiRtaW1lX2JvdW5kYXJ5Ig0KDQogIFRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBpcyBpbiBN SU1FIGZvcm1hdC4gIFRoZSBmaXJzdCBwYXJ0IHNob3VsZCBiZSByZWFkYWJs ZSB0ZXh0LA0KICB3aGlsZSB0aGUgcmVtYWluaW5nIHBhcnRzIGFyZSBsaWtl bHkgdW5yZWFkYWJsZSB3aXRob3V0IE1JTUUtYXdhcmUgdG9vbHMuDQoNCi0t JG1pbWVfYm91bmRhcnkNCg0KU3ViamVjdDogTW9kZXJhdG9yIEluc3RydWN0 aW9ucw0KDQpNT0RFUkFUT1I6IFRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgbWVzc2FnZSB3YXMg cG9zdGVkIHRvICIkbGlzdF9uYW1lIiANCiAgICAgICAgICAgYW5kIGlzIGF3 YWl0aW5nIHlvdXIgYXBwcm92YWwuDQogICAgICAgICAgICRudW1fbW9kc19t c2cNCiAgICAgbyBUbyBBUFBST1ZFOiAgUmVwbHkgdG8gdGhpcyBlbWFpbC4g IFRoYXQncyBpdCENCiAgICAgbyBUbyBESVNDQVJEOiAgQ2hhbmdlIENPTU1B TkQgaW4gdGhlIFN1YmplY3QgdG8gRElTQ0FSRA0KDQogICAgICAgRXhhbXBs ZXM6DQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgQ09NTUFORCBBUFBST1ZFICRzZXJpYWxf bnVtDQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAtIG9yIC0NCiAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICBDT01NQU5EIERJU0NBUkQgJHNlcmlhbF9udW0NCg0KICAg ICA8RXh0cmEgc3R1ZmYgYmVmb3JlICJDT01NQU5EIiBpbiB0aGUgU3ViamVj dCB3aWxsIGJlIGlnbm9yZWQuPg0KDQotIC0gLSAtIC0gLSAtIA0KT1RIRVIg Q09NTUFORFMNCi0gLSAtIC0gLSAtIC0gDQogbyBDT01NRU5UOiAgKldBUk5J TkcqICBUaGUgcG9zdCB3aWxsIGJlIGFwcHJvdmVkLCBhbmQgeW91ciBtZXNz YWdlIA0KICAgICAgICAgICAgIHRleHQgaXMgYWRkZWQgYXMgYSBNb2RlcmF0 b3IncyBjb21tZW50IG9uIHRoZSBwb3N0Lg0KDQogbyBSRUpFQ1Q6ICAgKldB Uk5JTkcqICBUaGUgcG9zdCB3aWxsIGJlIGRpc2NhcmRlZCwgYW5kIHlvdXIg bWVzc2FnZQ0KICAgICAgICAgICAgIHRleHQgaXMgYWRkZWQgYXMgYSBNb2Rl cmF0b3IncyBleHBsYWluYXRpb24gZm9yIHRoZSANCiAgICAgICAgICAgICBy ZWplY3Rpb24uICBUaGlzIGVtYWlsIGlzIHRoZW4gZm9yd2FyZGVkIHRvIHRo ZSBzZW5kZXIuDQoNCiBvIFNVQjogICAgICBEaXNjYXJkcyB0aGUgcG9zdCwg YW5kIHByb2Nlc3NlcyBhIGNvcnJlY3QgInN1YnNjcmliZSINCiAgICAgICAg ICAgICByZXF1ZXN0IG9uIGJlaGFsZiBvZiB0aGUgdXNlci4NCg0KIG8gVU5T VUI6ICAgIERpc2NhcmRzIHRoZSBwb3N0LCBhbmQgcHJvY2Vzc2VzIGEgY29y cmVjdCAidW5zdWJzY3JpYmUiDQogICAgICAgICAgICAgcmVxdWVzdCBvbiBi ZWhhbGYgb2YgdGhlIHVzZXIuDQoNCi0tJG1pbWVfYm91bmRhcnkNCg0KJG1l c3NhZ2VfaGVhZGVyDQoNCiRtZXNzYWdlX2JvZHkNCi0tJG1pbWVfYm91bmRh cnktLQ0KRW5kIG9mIE5vdGlmaWNhdGlvbiAtIE1vZGVyYXRlIHYkdmVyc2lv bg0KKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioN CkVPRg0KDQoJY2xvc2UgTUFJTDsNCiAgICB9DQp9DQoNCnN1YiBnZXRfbW9k ZXJhdG9ycygpDQp7DQogICAgbXkgJG1vZGVyYXRvcnMgPSAnJzsNCg0KICAg IGlmIChvcGVuKE1PRCwgIjwkbW9kZXJhdG9yc19maWxlIikpIHsNCglteSAk bnVtX21vZHMgPSAwOw0KDQoJd2hpbGUgKDxNT0Q+KSB7DQoJICAgIGNob21w Ow0KCSAgICBzL15ccysvLzsNCgkgICAgcy9ccyskLy87DQoJICAgIGlmICgk Xykgew0KCQkkbW9kZXJhdG9ycyAuPSAiJF8sICI7DQoJCSRudW1fbW9kcyAr KzsNCgkgICAgfQ0KCX0NCgljbG9zZSBNT0Q7DQoNCgkkbW9kZXJhdG9ycyA9 fiBzLywgJC8vOw0KDQoJaWYgKCRudW1fbW9kcyA+IDEpIHsNCgkgICAgJG51 bV9tb2RzX21zZyA9ICIkbnVtX21vZHMgbW9kZXJhdGVycyByZWNlaXZlZCB0 aGlzIG1lc3NhZ2UuXG4iOw0KCX0NCiAgICB9DQogICAgDQogICAgIyBGYWxs IGJhY2sgb24gdGhlIHJjLmN1c3RvbSBmaWxlIGlmIG5lZWRlZA0KICAgICRt b2RlcmF0b3JzID0gJmdldF9tYWludGFpbmVyIHVubGVzcyAkbW9kZXJhdG9y czsgDQoNCiAgICAkbW9kZXJhdG9yczsNCn0NCg0Kc3ViIGdldF9tYWludGFp bmVyKCkNCnsNCiAgICBvcGVuKFJDLCAiPCRyY19maWxlIikNCgl8fCBkaWUg IkNhbid0IG9wZW4gcmMgZmlsZTogJHJjX2ZpbGU6ICQhXG4iOyANCg0KICAg IG15ICRtYWludGFpbmVyID0gJyc7DQoNCiAgICB3aGlsZSAoPFJDPikgew0K CWlmICgvXm1haW50YWluZXJccyo9XHMqKC4qKS9pKSB7DQoJICAgICRtYWlu dGFpbmVyID0gJDE7DQoJICAgICRtYWludGFpbmVyID1+IHMvXCMuKi8vOw0K CSAgICAkbWFpbnRhaW5lciA9fiBzL1xzKyQvLzsNCgkgICAgJG1haW50YWlu ZXIgPX4gcy9eXHMrLy87DQoJICAgIGxhc3Q7DQoJfQ0KICAgIH0NCiAgICBj bG9zZSBSQzsNCg0KICAgICRtYWludGFpbmVyOw0KfQ0KDQpzdWIgZGlzY2Fy ZF9wb3N0KCQgKQ0Kew0KICAgIHVubGluayAiJHNwb29sX2Rpci8kX1swXSI7 CSMgZG9lc24ndCBtYXR0ZXIgaWYgdGhlIHVubGluayBmYWlscy4uLg0KfQ0K DQpzdWIgYXBwcm92ZV9wb3N0KCQgKQ0Kew0KICAgIG15ICgkcG9zdCkgPSBA XzsNCg0KICAgICZnZXRfbWFpbGZpbGUoJHBvc3QpOw0KDQogICAgb3BlbihG TElTVCwgInwkZmxpc3RfbG9jICRsaXN0X25hbWUiKSANCgl8fCBkaWUgIkNh bid0IGZvcms6ICQhXG4iOw0KICAgIHByaW50IEZMSVNUICRtYWlsX2hlYWRl ciwgJG1haWxfYm9keTsNCg0KICAgIGlmICgkY29tbWVudCkgew0KCXByaW50 IEZMSVNUIDw8IkVPRiI7DQoNCj09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PQ0KIEEgbm90ZSBmcm9tIHRoZSBNb2RlcmF0b3INCj09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PQ0KRU9GDQoJcHJpbnQgRkxJU1QgJG1lc3NhZ2VfYm9k eTsNCiAgICB9DQogICAgY2xvc2UgRkxJU1Q7DQp9DQoNCnN1YiBwYXNzX3Rv X3JlcXVlc3QoKQ0Kew0KICAgIG9wZW4oRkxJU1QsICJ8JGZsaXN0X2xvYyAk bGlzdF9yZXF1ZXN0IikNCgl8fCBkaWUgIkNhbid0IGZvcms6ICQhXG4iOw0K ICAgIHByaW50IEZMSVNUICRtZXNzYWdlX2hlYWRlciwgIlxuXG4iLCAkbWVz c2FnZV9ib2R5Ow0KICAgIGNsb3NlIEZMSVNUOw0KfQ0KDQpzdWIgaGVscF91 c2VyKCQkKQ0Kew0KICAgIG15ICgkcG9zdCwgJGNvbW1hbmQpID0gQF87DQog ICAgDQogICAgJmdldF9tYWlsZmlsZSgkcG9zdCk7DQogICAgJG1haWxfaGVh ZGVyID1+IHMvXlN1YmplY3Q6LipcbihbIFx0XS4qXG4pKi9TdWJqZWN0OiAk Y29tbWFuZFxuL2ltOw0KDQogICAgb3BlbihGTElTVCwgInwkZmxpc3RfbG9j ICRsaXN0X3JlcXVlc3QiKQ0KCXx8IGRpZSAiQ2FuJ3QgZm9yazogJCFcbiI7 DQogICAgcHJpbnQgRkxJU1QgJG1haWxfaGVhZGVyLCAkbWFpbF9ib2R5Ow0K ICAgIGNsb3NlIEZMSVNUOw0KfQ0KDQpzdWIgZ2V0X2hlYWRlcnMoKQ0Kew0K ICAgICRtZXNzYWdlX2hlYWRlciA9fiBzL1xuXHMrLyAvZzsgICMgZml4IGNv bnRpbnVhdGlvbiBsaW5lcw0KDQogICAgJGZyb20gPSAkc3ViamVjdCA9ICcn Ow0KDQogICAgaWYgKCRtZXNzYWdlX2hlYWRlciA9fiAvXlN1YmplY3Q6ICgu KikvaW0peyANCgkkc3ViamVjdCA9ICQxOw0KCSRzdWJqZWN0ID1+IHMvXlxz Ky8vOw0KCSRzdWJqZWN0ID1+IHMvXHMrJC8vOw0KCSRzdWJqZWN0ID1+IHMv XHMrLyAvZzsNCgkkc3ViamVjdCA9fiBzL14uKig/PUNPTU1BTkQgKS8vOw0K CSRzdWJqZWN0ID0gdWMoJHN1YmplY3QpOw0KICAgIH0NCg0KICAgIGlmICgk bWVzc2FnZV9oZWFkZXIgPX4gL15SZXBseS1UbzogKC4qKS9pbSkgew0KCSRm cm9tID0gJDE7DQoJJGZyb20gPX4gcy9eXHMrLy87DQoJJGZyb20gPX4gcy9c cyskLy87DQogICAgfQ0KICAgIGVsc2lmICgkbWVzc2FnZV9oZWFkZXIgPX4g L15Gcm9tOiAoLiopL2ltKSB7DQoJJGZyb20gPSAkMTsNCgkkZnJvbSA9fiBz L15ccysvLzsNCgkkZnJvbSA9fiBzL1xzKyQvLzsNCiAgICB9DQp9DQoNCnN1 YiBnZXRfbWVzc2FnZSgpDQp7DQogICAgJG1lc3NhZ2VfaGVhZGVyID0gJyc7 DQogICAgJG1lc3NhZ2VfYm9keSAgID0gJyc7DQoNCiAgICB3aGlsZSAoPFNU RElOPikgew0KCWlmICgxIC4uIC9eJC8pIHsNCgkgICAgJG1lc3NhZ2VfaGVh ZGVyIC49ICRfOw0KCX0NCgllbHNlIHsNCgkgICAgJG1lc3NhZ2VfYm9keSAu PSAkXzsNCgl9DQogICAgfQ0KfQ0KDQpzdWIgZ2V0X21haWxmaWxlKCQgKQ0K ew0KICAgIG15ICgkcG9zdCkgPSBAXzsNCiAgICANCiAgICBteSAkbWFpbF9m aWxlID0gIiRzcG9vbF9kaXIvJHBvc3QiOw0KDQogICAgdW5sZXNzICgtZSAk bWFpbF9maWxlKSB7CSMgTWFrZSBzdXJlIHRoZSBmaWxlIGV4aXN0cw0KCXVu bGVzcyAoJHN1cHByZXNzX2Vycm9ycykgew0KCSAgICAjIFRlbGwgdGhlIG1h aW50YWluZXIgaWYgbm90DQoJICAgICZzZW5kX2Vycm9yKCJNZXNzYWdlIElE ICRwb3N0IHdhcyBub3QgZm91bmQuIik7DQoJfQ0KCWV4aXQ7DQogICAgfQ0K DQogICAgJG1haWxfaGVhZGVyID0gJyc7DQogICAgJG1haWxfYm9keSAgID0g Jyc7DQoNCiAgICBvcGVuKE1BSUxGSUxFLCAiPCRtYWlsX2ZpbGUiKSB8fCBk aWUgIkNvdWxkbid0IG9wZW4gJG1haWxfZmlsZTogJCFcbiI7DQoNCiAgICB3 aGlsZSAoPE1BSUxGSUxFPikgew0KCWlmICgxIC4uIC9eJC8pIHsNCgkgICAg JG1haWxfaGVhZGVyIC49ICRfOw0KCX0NCgllbHNlIHsNCgkgICAgJG1haWxf Ym9keSAuPSAkXzsNCgl9DQogICAgfQ0KDQogICAgY2xvc2UgRkxJU1Q7DQog ICAgY2xvc2UgTUFJTEZJTEU7DQoNCiAgICB1bmxpbmsgJG1haWxfZmlsZTsN Cn0NCg0Kc3ViIGNhdG1haWwoJCApDQp7DQogICAgbXkgKCRzZXJpYWxfbnVt KSA9IEBfOw0KDQogICAgaWYgKCEtZCAiJHNwb29sX2RpciIpIHsNCglta2Rp ciAkc3Bvb2xfZGlyLCAwNzc1Ow0KICAgIH0NCg0KICAgIG15ICRtYWlsX2Zp bGUgPSAiJHNwb29sX2Rpci8kc2VyaWFsX251bSI7DQoNCiAgICBvcGVuKE1B SUxGSUxFLCAiPiRtYWlsX2ZpbGUiKSANCgl8fCBkaWUgIkNhbid0IG9wZW4g TWFpbGZpbGUgJG1haWxfZmlsZTogJCFcbiI7DQogICAgcHJpbnQgTUFJTEZJ TEUgJG1lc3NhZ2VfaGVhZGVyLCAiXG5cbiIsICRtZXNzYWdlX2JvZHk7DQog ICAgY2xvc2UgTUFJTEZJTEU7DQp9DQoNCnN1YiBhc3NpZ25faWQoKQ0Kew0K ICAgIHNyYW5kKHRpbWUgXiAoJCQgKyAoJCQgPDwgMTUpKSk7DQogICAgdGlt ZSAuIGludChyYW5kKDk5OTkpKTsNCn0NCg== ---559023410-851401618-1001360764=:9476-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 06:43:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8PDh6i08043 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 06:43:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 25 06:43:03 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8PDh2A15296; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 06:43:02 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8PDfwr04782; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 06:41:58 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8PDdRN47548 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 06:39:27 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8PDdR725633 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 06:39:27 -0700 Received: FROM albatross-ext.wise.edt.ericsson.se BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 25 06:39:26 2001 -0700 Received: from madrid.ericsson.se (madrid.es.eu.ericsson.se [164.48.87.150]) by albatross.wise.edt.ericsson.se (8.11.0/8.11.0/WIREfire-1.3) with SMTP id f8PDdMK11285 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:39:23 +0200 (MEST) Received: from E00C04FFB5466 by madrid.ericsson.se (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id PAA29446; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:39:16 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:39:14 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Reply-To: bertrand.perez@ree.ericsson.se Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Bertrand PEREZ (REE)" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Accessing remote folders MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine INFO LIST X-X-Sender: reebepe@eestqnt104.es.eu.ericsson.se X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, I convinced a colleague to live Lookout for pine ... good starting point. but, he would like to have access to all the folders (not only the INBOX) that are located on the IMAP server. I tried to create new folders via Setup->CollectionLists but once created the folders are empty ... anyone can help me ? thanks and best regards/Bertrand -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:32:16 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8PIW8i05442 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:32:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 25 11:31:57 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8PIVuA27421; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:31:56 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8PIVdK29150; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:31:39 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8PIJLN28630 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:19:22 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8PIJLp20829 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 11:19:21 -0700 Received: FROM florence.ie.alphyra.com BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 25 11:19:20 2001 -0700 Received: from dunlop.dub.ie.alphyra.com (IDENT:paulj@dunlop.dub.ie.alphyra.com [192.168.10.24]) by florence.ie.alphyra.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8PIJER29132 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 19:19:15 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 19:19:14 +0100 (IST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Paul Jakma To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PGP/MIME MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: X-To: Pine Info X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN hi, just wondering if PGP/MIME support is planned for Pine, or alternatively to set display filters for a MIME part based on type? PGP interoperability with mutt and kmail users is slightly difficult, unfortunately. (has to be done by hand, and i can't verify sigs). regards, Paul Jakma. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:58:26 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8PLwHi16895 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:58:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 25 14:58:14 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8PLwDW08572; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:58:13 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8PLvqs25068; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:57:52 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8PLsfN20586 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:54:41 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8PLsf705604 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:54:41 -0700 Received: FROM www.ulatina.ac.cr BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 25 14:54:37 2001 -0700 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by www.ulatina.ac.cr (8.11.2/8.10.2) id f8PHIG811802 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:18:16 GMT Message-Id: <1001438296.3bb0bc5880460@correo> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: vicqueto@ns.isi.ulatina.ac.cr To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: can i tell pine 4.30 to auto forward any incoming email to another email acc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Authentication-Warning: www.ulatina.ac.cr: nobody set sender to vicqueto@ns.isi.ulatina.ac.cr using -f X-Originating-IP: 196.40.3.18 X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN i want pine to automatically forward all incoming email to another email account. thanks ----------------------------------------------------- Este mensaje fue enviado por medio de IMP: http://correo.ulatina.ac.cr -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:14:30 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8PMETi13981 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:14:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 25 15:14:27 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8PMEQW09282; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:14:26 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8PME9K33080; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:14:10 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8PMAvN44342 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:10:57 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8PMAu714638 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:10:56 -0700 Received: FROM gort.cjb.net BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 25 15:10:56 2001 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gort.cjb.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97223A8B1 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:12:58 +0530 (IST) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:12:58 +0530 (IST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Satya To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: can i tell pine 4.30 to auto forward any incoming email to another email acc In-Reply-To: <1001438296.3bb0bc5880460@correo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Sender: satyap@localhost.localdomain X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sep 25, 2001 at 17:18, vicqueto@ns.isi.ulatina.ac.cr wrote: >i want pine to automatically forward all incoming email to another email >account. Make a .forward file in your home directory, with the 2nd email address in it. -- Satya. As long as I can remember, I've had amnesia. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:16:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8PMGsi07405 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:16:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 25 15:16:52 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8PMGqA05262; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:16:52 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8PMGMA09600; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:16:22 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8PMBbN112222 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:11:38 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8PMBbv02140 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:11:37 -0700 Received: FROM euler.math.washington.edu BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 25 15:11:37 2001 -0700 Received: from goedel1.math.washington.edu (goedel1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.10]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8PMB6P209721; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:11:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:11:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: can i tell pine 4.30 to auto forward any incoming email to another email acc In-Reply-To: <1001438296.3bb0bc5880460@correo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: vicqueto@ns.isi.ulatina.ac.cr X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** vicqueto@ns.isi.ulatina.ac.cr wrote in the pine-info list today: :) i want pine to automatically forward all incoming email to another email :) account. You can not do that with Pine. Use other tools, like a ".forward" file (where you would enter the e-mail address where you want e-mails to be forwarded). Pine does not know anything about a ".forward" file, by the way. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 20:51:12 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8Q3pAi05490 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 20:51:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 25 20:51:09 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8Q3p4W20063; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 20:51:04 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8Q3oVA26788; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 20:50:31 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8Q3mLN83938 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 20:48:21 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8Q3mLv07896 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 20:48:21 -0700 Received: FROM devserv.devel.redhat.com BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Tue Sep 25 20:48:20 2001 -0700 Received: from localhost (mharris@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f8Q3lu620836; Tue, 25 Sep 2001 23:47:56 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 23:47:56 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Mike A. Harris" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PGP/MIME In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Paul Jakma X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: devserv.devel.redhat.com: mharris owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: X-Unexpected-Header: The Spanish Inquisition X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Paul Jakma wrote: >Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 19:19:14 +0100 (IST) >From: Paul Jakma >To: Pine Discussion Forum >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII >Subject: PGP/MIME > >hi, > >just wondering if PGP/MIME support is planned for Pine, or >alternatively to set display filters for a MIME part based on type? > >PGP interoperability with mutt and kmail users is slightly >difficult, unfortunately. (has to be done by hand, and i can't verify >sigs). PINE's display filters as you say are the way to go. I believe the PINE FAQ states encryption software will never be included in PINE directly. Red Hat Linux PINE ships with pgp/gpg support by default, so if you're using our distro, your PINE is already ready for GPG/PGP. Hope this helps, TTYL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike A. Harris Shipping/mailing address: OS Systems Engineer 190 Pittsburgh Ave., Sault Ste. Marie, XFree86 maintainer Ontario, Canada, P6C 5B3 Red Hat Inc. Phone: (705)949-2136 http://www.redhat.com ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris Red Hat XFree86 mailing list: xfree86-list@redhat.com IRC: #redhat-xfree86 on irc.openprojects.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------- root@dod.usarmy.gov:~# rm -f /bin/laden From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 08:46:19 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8QFkBF04045 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 08:46:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 26 08:46:09 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8QFk8W05087; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 08:46:08 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8QFjgA11146; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 08:45:43 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8QFiHN49516 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 08:44:17 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8QFiG723164 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 08:44:16 -0700 Received: FROM users.assist.ro BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 26 08:44:15 2001 -0700 Received: from dialup05.assist.ro (dialup05.assist.ro [194.102.130.37]) by users.assist.ro (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f8QFiAP14879 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 18:44:12 +0300 Message-Id: <7111354716.20010926183503@yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 18:35:03 +0300 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Silviu Cojocaru To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: can i tell pine 4.30 to auto forward any incoming email to another email acc In-Reply-To: <1001438296.3bb0bc5880460@correo> References: <1001438296.3bb0bc5880460@correo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Tuesday, September 25, 2001, 8:18:16 PM, vicqueto@ns.isi.ulatina.ac.cr wrote: > i want pine to automatically forward all > incoming email to another email account. Well just type something like pico .forward when the typing screen appears type the address you want to forward to in there. If you want to keep a copy of the message in the current account just type your e-mail address on the first line and the one you want to forward to on the second. -- They say the grass is greener on the other side, but have you ever flipped it over? ________________________________________________ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 08:46:43 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8QFkeF28475 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 08:46:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 26 08:46:37 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8QFkaA00914; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 08:46:36 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8QFkVA11150; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 08:46:31 -0700 Received: from mxu102.u.washington.edu (mxu102.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8QFiIN111004 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 08:44:18 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by mxu102.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8QFiIE00757 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 08:44:18 -0700 Received: FROM users.assist.ro BY mxu2.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 26 08:44:16 2001 -0700 Received: from dialup05.assist.ro (dialup05.assist.ro [194.102.130.37]) by users.assist.ro (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f8QFiDP14882 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 18:44:13 +0300 Message-Id: <5811513931.20010926183742@yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 18:37:42 +0300 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Silviu Cojocaru To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PGP/MIME In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tuesday, September 25, 2001, 9:19:14 PM, Paul Jakma wrote: > just wondering if PGP/MIME support is planned > for Pine, or alternatively to set display > filters for a MIME part based on type? Why do you need PGP/MIME support anyway ? To encrypt/sign/decrypt use Pine's pgp/gpg support. More on this should be found in Pine's docs, or you could ask the gpg discussion list members. G'luck! - -- E-mail returned to sender -- insufficient voltage. ___________________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) Comment: Member of the PGP-Basics, Encryption Help Team iD8DBQE7sfZE8WBGNj3ut+0RArJiAJ9HiN7j0jsN6Dn/A4diHGgMFUmZIACfbJwK EBv8Pkr2Xn/SNPtCJgNBHyg= =Cs0S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:27:45 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8QJRhF14657 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 26 12:27:40 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8QJReW14773; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:27:40 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8QJREr21064; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:27:14 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8QJOsN55384 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:24:54 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8QJOs725698 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:24:54 -0700 Received: FROM smtp.gospelcom.net BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 26 12:24:53 2001 -0700 Received: (qmail 7489 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2001 19:24:48 -0000 Received: from jabbok.gospelcom.net (HELO amos.gf.gospelcom.net) (204.253.132.4) by joppa.gospelcom.net with SMTP; 26 Sep 2001 19:24:48 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:24:42 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Joel Boonstra To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: feature request: multiple nicknames in one addressbook entry MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: joel@amos.gf.gospelcom.net X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN [ preface: I have checked the FAQ and list archives for this, and found nothing. Please point me to the appropriate URLs if this question has already been answered ] I've got a pretty extensive address book, and it comes up a lot of times that I'll try to use more than one nickname to identify a person. That is, if I know someone named 'john', but I also call them 'jack' sometimes, it's equally likely that I'll enter either 'john' or 'jack' in my To: line when composing a new message. Ideally, my address book would recognize either as being the intended recipient, and fill in the approprite address. The only way that I currently know of to accomplish this would be to create a separate addressbook entry for each nickname that I'd want to use. The obvious problem is that data can now become out-of-synch. If John's address changes, and I change the 'jack' entry, but forget about the 'john' entry, I'll have two different email addresses stored for him. The ideal solution in my mind would be to allow a comma-separated list of nicknames to be specified when creating a new addressbook entry. I see by trial-and-error that commas aren't allowed in the nickname field. Does this mean that they will be used for something soon? Or is there another reason for the restriction? In any case, would this feature be feasible? To simplify, perhaps there could be a nickname (used as a primary key, of sorts) and then a list of alternate nicknames. All sorting and such would be done on the primary nickname. Poking around in the code, it seems that this would be a pretty major change. Have others run into this as well? -- [ joel boonstra | jboonstra@gospelcom.net ] -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 21:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8R4bUF04921 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 21:37:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 26 21:37:28 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8R4bRW00470; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 21:37:27 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8R4b6K15736; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 21:37:06 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8R4ZXN72358 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 21:35:33 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8R4ZX714172 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 21:35:33 -0700 Received: FROM mule.its.vu.edu.AU BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 26 21:35:32 2001 -0700 Received: from centaur.its.vu.edu.au (centaur.its.vu.edu.au [140.159.60.107]) by mule.its.vu.edu.AU (8.12.0.Beta12/8.12.0.Beta12/Debian 8.12.0.Beta10) with ESMTP id f8R4ZUcZ015598 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 14:35:31 +1000 Received: from cerberus.its.vu.edu.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by centaur.its.vu.edu.au (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f8R4ZUk23829 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 14:35:30 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 14:39:35 +1000 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Stewart James To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Auto save? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: stewart@cerberus.its.vu.edu.au X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, I have been using pine for a while now, and finally having the time to get serious I have started looking at some automation to keep better records. What I want to do is auto-save all message (well most a !postmaster would be good), into a folder for the sender. For instance if I sent myself one it would go into auto-save/stewart.james or similar. And then I would love to get the auto archiver to go through the entire autosave folder and archive each mail folder (stewart.james-MON-YEAR). Has anyone done anything like this within pine(under linux) 4.40? Has anyone managed to mangle a more advanced archiving system? for instance to be able to have a structure such as: Mail/ Archives/ Security-Alerts/ current (links 2 current month) 2001/ Jan Feb Sent-Mail/ current 2001/ Jan/ Feb/ Incoming/ (An extention on the above auto-save mentioned) Sender1/ current 2001/ Jan Feb Sender2/ current 2001/ Jan Feb I know at first glance it appears to be a complicated mess, but look at it a couple of times, its a structure that would make personal archiving of large amounts of mail simple. It's worth noting the extra level I place in the "Incoming" tree. Under this system finding an email sent in Jan 2001 would be easy and as you nail down to the folder the screen would not look cluttered as each year would only have maximum of 12 folders. The sent mail structure could be expanded to make use of a structure like incoming mail to mail it easier to locate email sent to someone. Adding this sort of funtionality would be a serious undertaking, but it would definately be a "feature" that would probably get used by anyone who has a large amount oif email to deal with. If anyone has a solution for my first part of my message I would love to here. Cheers, Stewart James -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:26:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8R5Q7F08393 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:26:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 26 22:26:05 2001 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8R5Q4A30049; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:26:04 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8R5PqA04720; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:25:52 -0700 Received: from mxu102.u.washington.edu (mxu102.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8R58TN112540 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:08:29 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by mxu102.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8R58SE10439 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:08:28 -0700 Received: FROM euler.math.washington.edu BY mxu2.u.washington.edu ; Wed Sep 26 22:08:28 2001 -0700 Received: from goedel1.math.washington.edu (goedel1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.10]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8R55tP318368; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:05:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Edo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Auto save? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Stewart James X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Stewart James (stewart.james@vu.edu.au) wrote in the pine-info list on...: :) What I want to do is auto-save all message (well most a !postmaster would :) be good), into a folder for the sender. If you want to save upon arrival, you need to set up a filter. Press M S R F, and when you get to that screen press "?" for help and "A" to add one. If you want to save into different folders upon quitting Pine, you can't do that, although it's very useful. The only way to do it is by using a patch that I wrote, which among other things does this. The patch is called "define your own rules..." and can be obtained from my web page (address below). :) For instance if I sent myself one it would go into :) auto-save/stewart.james or similar. And then I would love to get the :) auto archiver to go through the entire autosave folder and archive each :) mail folder (stewart.james-MON-YEAR). You need to filter into something that is not an incoming folder and add the name of the folders that you want to prune into the "pruned-folders" configuration option. :) Has anyone managed to mangle a more advanced archiving system? for :) instance to be able to have a structure such as: I usually keep all my incoming folders in a hidden directory parallel to mail/, then I enter their definitions one by one in the incoming folders section, so it looks like a bunch of folders and does not emphasize that they live in a common directory. I also keep directories for people, as opposed to folders, that is to say I keep a directory for "MadameX", where I keep the folders, "sent-mail" and "saved-messages" for "MadameX", I also have different structures for saved mail from mailing lists. Probably my folder structure is more chaotic than yours, and the way I keep it is by using the patch I mentioned before, which saves me *A LOT* of time. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 01:38:12 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8R8b2F19843 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 01:37:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 01:36:27 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8R8aQW05391; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 01:36:26 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8R8a3s09744; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 01:36:03 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8R8XlN70718 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 01:33:47 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8R8Xkp29661 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 01:33:47 -0700 Received: FROM penguin-ext.wise.edt.ericsson.se BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 01:33:45 2001 -0700 Received: from madrid.ericsson.se (madrid.es.eu.ericsson.se [164.48.87.150]) by penguin.wise.edt.ericsson.se (8.11.0/8.10.1/WIREfire-1.3) with SMTP id f8R8Xbv10927 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:33:43 +0200 (MEST) Received: from E00C04FFB5466 by madrid.ericsson.se (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id KAA18150; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:33:31 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:33:28 +0200 (Romance Daylight Time) Reply-To: bertrand.perez@ree.ericsson.se Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Bertrand PEREZ (REE)" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: viewing various IMAP accounts MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine INFO LIST X-X-Sender: reebepe@eestqnt104.es.eu.ericsson.se X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, I have 2 email accounts in 2 different IMAP servers. I would like pine to be able to swap from one account to the other but it seems that this does not work (I tried with the folders feature). is it true or is there any trick to do it (except launching 2 separate pine sessions) ? thanks BR/Bertrand -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 01:47:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8R8jVF26387 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 01:46:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 01:44:10 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8R8iAA01554; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 01:44:10 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8R8i3r26868; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 01:44:03 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8R8fnN09864 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 01:41:49 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8R8fnv11984 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 01:41:49 -0700 Received: FROM euler.math.washington.edu BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 01:41:48 2001 -0700 Received: from goedel3.math.washington.edu (goedel3.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.12]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8R8fkP349072; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 01:41:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 01:41:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: viewing various IMAP accounts In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: "Bertrand PEREZ (REE)" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Bertrand PEREZ (REE) (bertrand.perez@ericsson.com) wrote in the...: :) I have 2 email accounts in 2 different IMAP servers. I would like pine :) to be able to swap from one account to the other but it seems that this :) does not work (I tried with the folders feature). is it true or is :) there any trick to do it (except launching 2 separate pine sessions) ? Hello Bertrand, You can add the folders as incoming-folders. Press M S C and [X] enable-incoming-folders, quit pine and restart it. Press L to go to the folder-collection screen and put the cursor over INBOX, once there press "A". Enter the following information: name.imap.server/user=yourid Pine will ask you after this for the folder to enter. In this case enter /full/path/to/folder finally Pine will ask you for a nick. This is the name of the folder as you will see it. Enter anything you like. That should do it. Salu2. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:48:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8RHmPF28581 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:48:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 10:48:23 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8RHmMA16732; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:48:22 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8RHmDK07164; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:48:14 -0700 Received: from mxu102.u.washington.edu (mxu102.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8RHkSN60688 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:46:28 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by mxu102.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8RHkSE06937 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:46:28 -0700 Received: FROM parvati.colorado.edu BY mxu2.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 10:46:27 2001 -0700 Received: from localhost (dorsey@localhost) by parvati.colorado.edu (8.11.6/8.11.2/ITS-5.0/standard) with ESMTP id f8RHkQu06570 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:46:26 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:46:26 -0600 (MDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Susan Dorsey To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: bus error In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN We're running Pine 4.33 on Solaris 2.6. A user is randomly getting a "bus error" when opening Pine. Then once he gets in and tries to jump to the last message (there are nearly 2000) there's a mailbox lock message which "will overide in 195 seconds." Nothing in the Pine archives on this. Is it a known error? thanks Susan Dorsey Information Technology Services University of Colorado at Boulder -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:01:30 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8RI1OF28674 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:01:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 11:01:22 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8RI1LW20744; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:01:22 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8RI1HK28088; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:01:17 -0700 Received: from mxu102.u.washington.edu (mxu102.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8RI0KN25472 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:00:20 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by mxu102.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8RI0JE12149 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:00:20 -0700 Received: FROM shell13.ba.best.com BY mxu2.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 11:00:18 2001 -0700 Received: from localhost (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shell13.ba.best.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/best.sh) with ESMTP id KAA09487; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:59:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:51:05 +0100 (BST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: pmapi32.zip? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Technical Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: nancy@imap.iecc.com X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I'm updating this and noticed that pmapi32.zip is not where it used to be. Is this still part of the PC-Pine package? If so, can you tell me where it is? Thanks, Nancy ^x -- ii Main Pine Page: Nancy McGough Infinite Ink --= Sent via Pine: IMAP, NNTP & ESMTP for Unix/Win/Mac OS X =-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:01:54 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8RI1pF23065 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:01:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 11:01:49 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8RI1mW20750; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:01:48 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8RI1jK28098; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:01:46 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8RI0PN34242 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:00:25 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8RI0L721326 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:00:24 -0700 Received: FROM mxout1.cac.washington.edu BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 11:00:21 2001 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9] (may be forged)) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8RI0Le00311; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:00:21 -0700 Received: from [128.95.135.225] (D-128-95-135-225.dhcp.washington.edu [128.95.135.225]) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.0+UW01.09/8.12.0+UW01.09) with ESMTP id f8RI0KHY028945 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:00:21 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:00:21 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: feature request: multiple nicknames in one addressbook entry In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Joel Boonstra X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: hubert@shivams.cac.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN One way to do this is to have a primary entry for john, with all of the data. Then add another address book entry with nickname jack. The only data for jack is that the address is john. You don't fill in the Fullname or anything else in the jack entry. Now if you use jack, it will be the same as if you used john. -- Steve Hubert Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Joel Boonstra wrote: > [...] > I've got a pretty extensive address book, and it comes up a lot of times > that I'll try to use more than one nickname to identify a person. That > is, if I know someone named 'john', but I also call them 'jack' sometimes, > it's equally likely that I'll enter either 'john' or 'jack' in my To: line > when composing a new message. Ideally, my address book would recognize > either as being the intended recipient, and fill in the approprite > address. > [...] From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:14:01 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8RIDxF16064 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:14:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 11:13:55 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8RIDtW21213; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:13:55 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8RIDpK68824; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:13:51 -0700 Received: from mxu102.u.washington.edu (mxu102.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8RIDEN76254 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:13:15 -0700 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by mxu102.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8RIDEE18506 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:13:14 -0700 Received: FROM genesis.valpo.edu BY mxu2.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 11:13:04 2001 -0700 Received: from pluto (pluto.valpo.edu [152.228.34.10]) by genesis.valpo.edu (SendmailServer-1.0.4/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f8RICCL09736; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:12:12 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 13:12:49 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Simon Kissler To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: bus error In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Susan Dorsey X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: skissler@pluto X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Susan, I have noticed this when compiling LDAP support into pine 4.40 on Solaris 8 using openldap. My quick solution was to leave out the LDAP support, which seems to have fixed it. -Simon On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Susan Dorsey wrote: > Received: from localhost by genesis with LMTP for > ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 12:48:17 -0500 > Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu > [140.142.8.99]) > by genesis.valpo.edu (SendmailServer-1.0.4/8.11.1) with ESMTP id > f8RHmGL06369 > for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 12:48:17 -0500 (CDT) > Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) > by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with > SMTP id f8RHmDK07164; > Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:48:14 -0700 > Received: from mxu102.u.washington.edu (mxu102.u.washington.edu > [140.142.32.15]) > by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with > ESMTP id f8RHkSN60688 > for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:46:28 -0700 > Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu > [140.142.32.9]) > by mxu102.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with > SMTP id f8RHkSE06937 > for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:46:28 -0700 > Received: FROM parvati.colorado.edu BY mxu2.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 > 10:46:27 2001 -0700 > Received: from localhost (dorsey@localhost) > by parvati.colorado.edu (8.11.6/8.11.2/ITS-5.0/standard) with > ESMTP id f8RHkQu06570 > for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:46:26 -0600 (MDT) > Message-ID: > Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:46:26 -0600 (MDT) > Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu > Precedence: bulk > List-Help: > List-Unsubscribe: > > List-Subscribe: > > List-Owner: (Human contact > for the list) > List-Post: > From: Susan Dorsey > To: Pine Discussion Forum > Subject: bus error > In-Reply-To: > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > X-To: Pine Discussion Forum > X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN > > We're running Pine 4.33 on Solaris 2.6. A user is randomly getting a "bus > error" when opening Pine. Then once he gets in and tries to jump to the > last message (there are nearly 2000) there's a mailbox lock message which > "will overide in 195 seconds." > > Nothing in the Pine archives on this. Is it a known error? > > thanks > > Susan Dorsey > Information Technology Services > University of Colorado at Boulder > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: > http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Simon Kissler Simon.Kissler@valpo.edu UNIX Systems Administrator Phone: (219) 464 6773 Electronic Information Services Fax : (219) 464 5381 Valparaiso University Kretzmann Hall B22 Valparaiso, IN 46383 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Without trust, you don't have anything. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8RItPF18686 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 11:55:23 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8RItMW22751; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:55:22 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8RItIK15652; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:55:18 -0700 Received: from mxu104.u.washington.edu (mxu104.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8RIsGN26788 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:54:16 -0700 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by mxu104.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8RIsFp13015 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:54:15 -0700 Received: FROM mxout1.cac.washington.edu BY mxu4.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 11:54:15 2001 -0700 Received: from mailhost1.u.washington.edu (mailhost1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.2]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8RIsEe13836; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:54:14 -0700 Received: from [10.95.135.31] (fw135.cac.washington.edu [128.95.135.30]) by mailhost1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8RIsEP30951; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:54:14 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:54:14 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jeff Franklin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: pmapi32.zip? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Nancy McGough X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: jpf@shivams.cac.washington.edu X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Nancy McGough wrote: > I'm updating this > > > > and noticed that pmapi32.zip is not where it used to be. Is this > still part of the PC-Pine package? If so, can you tell me where > it is? Thanks for catching that. It's back up now. Jeff -- Jeff Franklin Networks and Distributed Computing University of Washington From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:59:20 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8S2xJF31020 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:59:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 19:59:17 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8S2xHA03419; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:59:17 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8S2x5r15360; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:59:05 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8S2vmN74324 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:57:48 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8S2vl728355 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:57:47 -0700 Received: FROM mule.its.vu.edu.AU BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 19:57:46 2001 -0700 Received: from centaur.its.vu.edu.au (centaur.its.vu.edu.au [140.159.60.107]) by mule.its.vu.edu.AU (8.12.0.Beta12/8.12.0.Beta12/Debian 8.12.0.Beta10) with ESMTP id f8S2vccZ028146; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:57:38 +1000 Received: from cerberus.its.vu.edu.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by centaur.its.vu.edu.au (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f8S2vbm08011; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:57:37 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 13:01:54 +1000 (EST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Stewart James To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Auto save? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Edo Chappa X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: stewart@cerberus.its.vu.edu.au X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN First off I would like to thank Mr. Chappa for his recent help, I ran into trouble with the "Create your own rules patch" and he was kind enough to take my bug report seriously and also fix the problem in only a really short time. Now back to my problem. Assuming others may have had the same idea and I think I have made the mistake of linking /dev/clue to /dev/null I though I would continue hassling the list ;) My last email probably was not as clear as it could have been and of course now I am trying to implement things my explanation may become a tad clearer. What I would like is a rule on incoming folders(I use IMAP), on all messages not seen by pine before to SAVE (copy not move) to a folder for each sender. sender1 into sender1 sender2 into sender2, issues: * I can probably get something like this work if I lobbed all messages into the one folder, however, I would like a seperate folder for each sender. * I do not want to move the messages on exit as I may have already done an expunge during the session, and I would like to copy..not move. * Finally I do not want to have to setup a rule for each person I correspond some form of *vu.edu.au would be great. I hope that makes sense. I get the feeling that I may not be able to achieve this with pine in it's current incarnation, or maybe there is someway to do it that I am just not seeing. As I said right now I feel as if /dev/clue is linked against /dev/null and any assistance is really appreciated. Thanks again to Mr. Chappa and to others in the list that alwasy seem to have \the answers. Stewart From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8S2xmF08739 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:59:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 19:59:47 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8S2xkA03434; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:59:46 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8S2xhK15224; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:59:43 -0700 Received: from mxu103.u.washington.edu (mxu103.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8S2xCN100568 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:59:12 -0700 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by mxu103.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8S2xCv14096 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:59:12 -0700 Received: FROM vax.hanford.org BY mxu3.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 19:59:11 2001 -0700 Received: (qmail 14640 invoked by uid 1828); 28 Sep 2001 02:59:10 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 19:59:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: How do I actually compile in SSL/security stuff? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Ok here's a dumb question.. and not knowing the answer probably means I shouldn't be trying to play around with security stuff I don't really "get" I thought I could just turn it on in a config file, then I got: make: *** No rule to make target `../c-client/c-client.a', needed by `pine'. Stop. From: * TLS and SSL support + TLS is fully supported in sources + SSL is fully integrated in the source, due to changes in US export regulations "integrated" makes me think that that means that I don't have to download/ compile something else. but I think I really need to build/install OpenSSL, right? (I saw reference to OpenSSL in a makefile.) Is any of this already installed in Mac OSX/Darwin? (I looked for some sub-/usr item mentioned in a makefile and it doesn't exist.) What is TLS anyway/where do I find out about it? And even more importantly -- doesn't the IMAP server I connect to have to support SSL/TLS too? How do I find out if my server(s) support this? And what are: Authenticators: CRAM-MD5 PLAIN LOGIN ??? Sorry, a bunch of REALLY basic questions. I guess I've been glad that it built "out of the box" on OSX! (Since I was able to get previous versions working just by compiling them..) -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:02:25 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8S52OF09681 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 22:02:22 2001 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8S52MA05862; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:02:22 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8S52DK33078; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 22:02:13 -0700 Received: from mxu101.u.washington.edu (mxu101.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8S4xdN48808 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 21:59:39 -0700 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by mxu101.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8S4xd720681 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 21:59:39 -0700 Received: FROM euler.math.washington.edu BY mxu1.u.washington.edu ; Thu Sep 27 21:59:38 2001 -0700 Received: from goedel1.math.washington.edu (goedel1.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.10]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8S4v6P397263; Thu, 27 Sep 2001 21:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 21:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Auto save? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Stewart James X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Stewart James (stewart.james@vu.edu.au) wrote in the pine-info list on...: :) What I would like is a rule on incoming folders(I use IMAP), on all :) messages not seen by pine before to SAVE (copy not move) to a folder for :) each sender. sender1 into sender1 sender2 into sender2, issues: You can do that with the patch you downloaded, just make sure that you set: [X] auto-move-read-msgs [X] auto-move-read-msgs-using-rules [X] expunge-only-manually [ ] expunge-without-confirm and define the read-message-folder also. That will copy all messages into their respective folders as defined by the rules. The only thing that will happen is that next time you open pine you will see all these messages marked as deleted, but you can easily get rid of that by using the ";" command. :) * I do not want to move the messages on exit as I may have already done an :) expunge during the session, and I would like to copy..not move. The patch will move only messages that are not deleted and that have been read. :) * Finally I do not want to have to setup a rule for each person I :) correspond some form of *vu.edu.au would be great. I hope that makes :) sense. The patch is very flexible, contact me if you want tips on how to set these things up. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 09:27:49 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8SGRlF29836; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 09:27:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8SGRjW24586; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 09:27:45 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8SGRbA04718; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 09:27:38 -0700 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8SGMBN114386 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 09:22:11 -0700 Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 28 09:22:11 2001 -0700 Received: from baker.phys.ucl.ac.uk (baker.phys.ucl.ac.uk [128.40.8.7]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8SGMAQ14040 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 09:22:10 -0700 Received: from tantalos.phys.ucl.ac.uk (tantalos.phys.ucl.ac.uk [128.40.8.77]) by baker.phys.ucl.ac.uk (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA31620 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:22:09 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (ahh@localhost) by tantalos.phys.ucl.ac.uk (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id RAA22359 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:22:09 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:22:09 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: Tony Harker Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Tony Harker To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Missing reply in reply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Authentication-Warning: tantalos.phys.ucl.ac.uk: ahh owned process doing -bs X-Sender: ahh@tantalos.phys.ucl.ac.uk X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Often when I reply from pine running under Unix to a user under Windows (whose original message to me came through as a collection of files, including HTML, put together by Eudora or Outlook in many cases), all they receive back from me is their original message. Yet my sent-mail folder contains exactly what I thought I sent -- their message indented and >'d, with my reply interspersed. Obviously one of us has a wrongly configured system, but which? Tony Harker __________________________________________________________________ | Dr A.H. Harker | | Reader in Condensed Matter Physics | | Director of Postgraduate Studies | | (Centre for Materials Research) /\ | | | | | | Department of Physics and Astronomy /--\ |---| |---| | | University College / \o| |o| |o | | Gower Street ---------------------- | | LONDON | | WC1E 6BT | | Tel (44) (0)207 679 3404 | | Fax (44) (0)207 679 7145 | | E-mail a.harker@ucl.ac.uk | |________________________________________________________________| -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:38:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8SJcUF03632; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:38:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8SJcSW32752; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:38:28 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8SJcKA19738; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:38:20 -0700 Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8SJYZN52028 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:34:35 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 28 12:34:34 2001 -0700 Received: from shell13.ba.best.com (root@shell13.ba.best.com [206.184.139.144]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8SJYXw04736 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:34:34 -0700 Received: from localhost (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shell13.ba.best.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/best.sh) with ESMTP id MAA08048; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:33:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 20:34:15 +0100 (BST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PC-Pine and the Windows registry MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Technical Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: ii@akket.pair.com X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I've just added a section to my Power Pine page about Pine registry settings. The section is at either of these URLs: Primary: http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/pc/#registry Backup: http://www.best.com/~ii/internet/messaging/pine/pc/#registry And here's what it says... ---- 12. Checking Registry Settings Starting with version 4.30???, PC-Pine enters some data in the MS Windows registry. To check your Pine-related settings, click on the Windows Start button, choose Run, and type: \full\path\to\pine.exe -registry dump If you used an earlier version of PC-Pine (4.30, 4.31, 4.32, 4.33), it is possible (actually likely) that the registry contains the settings for your old version of PC-Pine. If your Pine registry settings are not correct for your current version of PC-Pine, clear them by running this: \full\path\to\pine.exe -registry clear The next time you run PC-Pine, it will reset the registry with the correct settings for the PC-Pine you are currently using. ---- My questions are: * Was it 4.30 that started using the registry? * The fact that Pine uses old registry settings seems like a bug to me -- does anyone else see this? I think that what I did to produce this bug was use Windows Explorer to rename my old Pine directory and maybe Windows Explorer and the Registry were talking to each other and the Registry modified the Pine paths??? Does anyone else see incorrect settings when you run `pine -registry dump'? * Any suggestions for what I should say or pages I can link to in this section of my page are welcome! Thanks, Nancy -- ii Main Pine Page: Nancy McGough Infinite Ink --= Sent via Pine: IMAP, NNTP & ESMTP for Unix/Win/Mac OS X =-- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8SMwTF30219; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:58:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8SMwSA06526; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:58:28 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8SMwMA08402; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:58:22 -0700 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8SMvCN71546 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:57:12 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 28 15:57:11 2001 -0700 Received: from server1.shellworld.net (root@server1.shellworld.net [64.39.15.178]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8SMvBu06393 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:57:11 -0700 Received: from localhost (ricklew@localhost) by server1.shellworld.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f8SMvAH73536 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:57:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ricklew@shellworld.net) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:57:10 -0700 (MST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Rick Lewis To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: 4.40: is this a bug? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I've tried running Pine 4.40 with one of my config files, and it aborts, yet earlier versions don't do the core dump. I've tried it on two different systems and two different versions of FreeBSD. What seems to hang it up is the initial-keystrokes entry: initial-keystroke-list=l, ;, p, u, z Configs without that entry, and this config after the entry has been cleared, work fine. I don't know if this happens on non-FreeBSD systems. --Rick -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:57:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8SNvKF08316; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:57:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8SNvJA09052; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:57:19 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8SNvFr26690; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:57:15 -0700 Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8SNtKN14204 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:55:20 -0700 Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 28 16:55:20 2001 -0700 Received: from vax.hanford.org (vax.hanford.org [216.218.218.27]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8SNtKQ00751 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:55:20 -0700 Received: (qmail 18364 invoked by uid 1828); 28 Sep 2001 23:55:19 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:55:19 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: pine crash quitting links launched from pine.. question MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: X-X-Sender: X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Since we've announced 10.1, I guess I can mention this here.. I am not sure if it's a pine bug or an OSX bug, but it doesn't happen under similar circumstances on this personal acct (which is running Solaris I think).. But I mean version #s of pine/links are the same. Yes, I realize that's largely irrelevant.. So in pine, I have links set up to be my web browser.. If I go view a link from a mail message, then quit links, pine crashes with: Date/Time: 2001-09-27 18:21:54 -0700 OS Version: 10.1 (Build 5G64) Command: pine PID: 428 Exception: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (0x0001) Codes: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE (0x0002) at 0x00000000 Thread 0: #0 0x00000000 in 0x0 #1 0x7000f81c in _sigtramp #2 0x70006af0 in nanosleep #3 0x7000be90 in closedir PPC Thread State: srr0: 0x00000000 srr1: 0x4000d030 vrsave: 0x00000000 xer: 0x0000000b lr: 0x7000f81c ctr: 0x00000000 mq: 0x00000000 r0: 0x00000000 r1: 0xbfffe110 r2: 0x8000053d r3: 0x00000014 r4: 0x00000000 r5: 0xbfffe398 r6: 0x00000000 r7: 0xbfffe4c8 r8: 0x00000000 r9: 0x0000003e r10: 0x00000000 r11: 0x80003414 r12: 0x00000000 r13: 0x00000000 r14: 0x00000036 r15: 0xbfffee58 r16: 0xbfffee70 r17: 0x00000001 r18: 0x0035ae88 r19: 0x00001007 r20: 0x00000000 r21: 0x0000001c r22: 0x70004bc4 r23: 0x70004c58 r24: 0x00000001 r25: 0x000006eb r26: 0x8081ab5c r27: 0x0004d040 r28: 0x00000000 r29: 0xbfffef00 r30: 0x8081d1cc r31: 0x00000001 ********** So as a vague question where would I even start figuring out where this is? (BTW, still happens with pine 4.40) Are they just calling closedir(nil)? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:23:11 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8T0NAF27117; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:23:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8T0N9W12375; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:23:09 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8T0N1K13290; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:23:01 -0700 Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8T02JN111874 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:02:19 -0700 Received: FROM mxu4.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Sep 28 17:02:19 2001 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8T02JQ02609 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:02:19 -0700 Received: from goedel2.math.washington.edu (goedel2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.11]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8T02HP479743; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:02:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 17:02:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: 4.40: is this a bug? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Rick Lewis X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Rick Lewis (ricklew@shellworld.net) wrote in the pine-info list today: :) I've tried running Pine 4.40 with one of my config files, and it aborts, :) yet earlier versions don't do the core dump. As a principle no program should ever abort, for me a program that aborts has a bug. :) I've tried it on two different systems and two different versions of :) FreeBSD. :) What seems to hang it up is the initial-keystrokes entry: :) initial-keystroke-list=l, :) ;, :) p, :) u, :) z :) Someone reported this bug before, I do not recall where though. I have a patch for it in my web page. Look under bug fixes. -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 09:31:09 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8TGV7F19951 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 09:31:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Sep 29 09:31:02 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8TGUwW29453; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 09:30:58 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8TGUds32450; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 09:30:39 -0700 Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8TGS1N104380 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 09:28:01 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Sep 29 09:28:01 2001 -0700 Received: from lapd.cj.edu.ro (lapd.cj.edu.ro [193.231.142.101]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8TGRSU11542 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 09:27:55 -0700 Received: (qmail 8592 invoked by uid 559); 29 Sep 2001 16:27:19 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Sep 2001 16:27:19 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 19:27:19 +0300 (EEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Seby To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Pine 4.33 problems In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN `cat CCTYPE` -c `cat CFLAGS` news.c news.c: In function `news_open': news.c:330: warning: passing arg 3 of `scandir' from incompatible pointer type news.c: In function `news_header': news.c:472: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast news.c:473: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type news.c:473: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type news.c:474: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type news.c:475: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type news.c:475: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type news.c:476: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type make[3]: *** [news.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/pine4.33/imap/c-client' make[2]: *** [slx] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/pine4.33/imap/c-client' make[1]: *** [OSTYPE] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/pine4.33/imap' make: *** [slx] Error 2 Seby... PS: This pine is strange ... :)) --------------- http://lapd.cj.edu.ro/~seby E-mail: seby@lapd.cj.edu.ro --------------- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 10:41:46 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8THfjF13030; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 10:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8THfiA28864; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 10:41:44 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8THfZK21982; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 10:41:35 -0700 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8THbrN104218 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 10:37:53 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Sep 29 10:35:10 2001 -0700 Received: from florence.ie.alphyra.com (IDENT:sjs4Ew5/AnKYldGoyu7OjM2FltnAOk60@florence.ie.alphyra.com [193.120.224.170]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8THZ9w14403 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 10:35:09 -0700 Received: from dunlop.dub.ie.alphyra.com (IDENT:paulj@dunlop.dub.ie.alphyra.com [192.168.10.24]) by florence.ie.alphyra.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8THZ5R27181; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 18:35:05 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 18:35:05 +0100 (IST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Paul Jakma To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PGP/MIME In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: X-To: "Mike A. Harris" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Mike A. Harris wrote: > PINE's display filters as you say are the way to go. I believe > the PINE FAQ states encryption software will never be included in > PINE directly. i accept that.. however, how do i verify a signed multipart PGP/MIME encrypted email? in fact, how do i use a display filter on a MIME part in general? the support isn't there. > > Red Hat Linux PINE ships with pgp/gpg support by default, so if > you're using our distro, your PINE is already ready for GPG/PGP. i've got pgp4pine setup, works great. but i can't use it as a filter for PGP/MIME parts, cause, afaict, there is no way to set display filters for mime parts in pine. > > Hope this helps, > TTYL > --paulj From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 10:44:29 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8THiSF30328; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 10:44:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8THiRW30889; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 10:44:27 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8THiGA11606; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 10:44:16 -0700 Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8THf7N102630 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 10:41:07 -0700 Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Sep 29 10:38:24 2001 -0700 Received: from florence.ie.alphyra.com (IDENT:gEt3+WmSvChhB4QCQcbf3Mgfr0O29ntL@florence.ie.alphyra.com [193.120.224.170]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8THcNu07408 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 10:38:23 -0700 Received: from dunlop.dub.ie.alphyra.com (IDENT:paulj@dunlop.dub.ie.alphyra.com [192.168.10.24]) by florence.ie.alphyra.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8THcJR27209; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 18:38:19 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 18:38:19 +0100 (IST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Paul Jakma To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PGP/MIME In-Reply-To: <5811513931.20010926183742@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: X-To: Silviu Cojocaru X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Silviu Cojocaru wrote: > Why do you need PGP/MIME support anyway ? [snip] > To > encrypt/sign/decrypt use Pine's pgp/gpg support. what would that be? if you mean display filters, yep, i have pgp4pine working fine. however, that still leaves PGP/MIME. why do i want support for it, or more generically, ability to use display filters for mime parts. why PGP/MIME? cause more and more mailers are using it. eg mutt, kmail, that gnome GUI mail client, etc. and cause it's the now RFC mandated way to use PGP with email. > More on this should be found in Pine's docs, or > you could ask the gpg discussion list members. it's a pine problem unfortunately, afaict - need display filters for MIME. > G'luck! > > -- > E-mail returned to sender -- insufficient voltage. > ___________________________________________________ > ------------ Output from gpg ------------ > gpg: Signature made Wed 26 Sep 2001 04:37:40 PM IST using DSA key ID 3DEEB7ED > gpg: Good signature from "Silviu Cojocaru " > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! tsk tsk... :) > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. > gpg: Fingerprint: 51A0 D288 DD40 BE63 AEB4 06F0 F160 4636 3DEE B7ED --paulj From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 23:21:34 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from newman.cac.washington.edu (newman.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.4]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8U6LXF30797 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 23:21:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx1.cac.washington.edu BY newman.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Sep 29 23:21:31 2001 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8U6LVA09165; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 23:21:31 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8U6LOr23908; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 23:21:25 -0700 Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8U6IXN104068 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 23:18:33 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Sat Sep 29 23:18:30 2001 -0700 Received: from users.assist.ro (rsync.assist.ro [194.102.130.2]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8U6ISw01719 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 23:18:29 -0700 Received: from dialup29.assist.ro (dialup29.assist.ro [194.102.130.61]) by users.assist.ro (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8U6ILX14094 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 09:18:21 +0300 Message-Id: <8527333977.20010930001652@yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 00:16:52 +0300 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Silviu Cojocaru To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PGP/MIME In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Saturday, September 29, 2001 at 12:10:50 AM , Paul Jakma wrote about "PGP/MIME": > why PGP/MIME? cause more and more mailers are using it. eg > mutt, kmail, that gnome GUI mail client, etc. and cause it's > the now RFC mandated way to use PGP with email. Damn I've been off Linux for a long time :( Well, I see the mailers of Windows world, and they don't really support PGP/MIME. Well Eudora does have some support but it's rather buggy. Other use PGP/GPG plug-ins and support S/MIME, but they do it very well... well at least my mailer does :) >> ------------ Output from gpg ------------ >> gpg: Signature made Wed 26 Sep 2001 04:37:40 PM IST using DSA key ID 3DEEB7ED >> gpg: Good signature from "Silviu Cojocaru " >> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > > tsk tsk... > > :) Well sign my key :P Pay me a ticket from Bucharest to where you live so we can exchange keys face to face :))) - -- Klingon error: Strike any other user to continue. ______________________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) Comment: Member of the PGP-Basics, Encryption Help Team iD8DBQE7tjo28WBGNj3ut+0RAtJMAKCLHjn/8elDvfnoWjqXh5ySWBSbTwCgmz/D 8NNBXaJSg6b3dDd26VM02YU= =e5QR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 09:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8UG0WF09786; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 09:00:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8UG0WW20826; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 09:00:32 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8UG0Nr23308; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 09:00:23 -0700 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8UFuUN83856 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 08:56:30 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Sep 30 08:53:47 2001 -0700 Received: from florence.ie.alphyra.com (IDENT:DaFNpv7xcrr0oj6wB86nEcuuVBt0aqXN@florence.ie.alphyra.com [193.120.224.170]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8UFriw12182 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 08:53:45 -0700 Received: from dunlop.dub.ie.alphyra.com (IDENT:NpqGSVmdy+GQPa/+IRJQfLg7KI5VBjif@dunlop.dub.ie.alphyra.com [192.168.10.24]) by florence.ie.alphyra.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8UFrXR12797; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 16:53:34 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 16:53:33 +0100 (IST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Paul Jakma To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PGP/MIME In-Reply-To: <8527333977.20010930001652@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: X-To: Silviu Cojocaru X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, Silviu Cojocaru wrote: > Damn I've been off Linux for a long time :( > > Well, I see the mailers of Windows world, and they don't really > support PGP/MIME. Well Eudora does have some support but it's > rather buggy. Other use PGP/GPG plug-ins and support S/MIME, but > they do it very well... well at least my mailer does :) there are indeed a good few plugins to windows MUA's and even MTA's (eg Lotus Notes) to provide PGP support. we use PGP a /lot/ here for business purposes to trade files securely with partners. however, we're often plagued by incompatibilities. :( the fact that even mutt and pine can not interoperate transparently wrt to PGP is sad. MIME display filter support would be so nice. (but that still leaves PGP/MIME signature support.) > Well sign my key :P Pay me a ticket from Bucharest to where you > live so we can exchange keys face to face :))) i've signed your key and uploaded to wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net. even if we met face to face i still could not say for certain that you were the rightful owner of the key. however, on the basis that you are a regular poster to this forum, i've signed your key, still no web of trust between us though. :) > gpg: Good signature from "Silviu Cojocaru " > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. > gpg: Fingerprint: 51A0 D288 DD40 BE63 AEB4 06F0 F160 4636 3DEE B7ED --paulj From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun ??? 0 00:00:00 1970 +0000 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(12) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 09:22:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from claven.cac.washington.edu (claven.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.7]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8UGMLF06181 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 09:22:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mx2.cac.washington.edu BY claven.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Sep 30 09:22:17 2001 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8UGMHW21341; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 09:22:17 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8UGMCs33254; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 09:22:12 -0700 Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8UGLaN87334 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 09:21:36 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Sep 30 09:21:36 2001 -0700 Received: from users.assist.ro (proxy1.assist.ro [194.102.130.2]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8UGLZU14038 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 09:21:35 -0700 Received: from dialup07.assist.ro (dialup07.assist.ro [194.102.130.39]) by users.assist.ro (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8UGLRX23246 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 19:21:27 +0300 Message-Id: <1136464960.20010930192004@yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 19:20:04 +0200 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Silviu Cojocaru To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PGP/MIME In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sunday, September 30, 2001 at 7:16:42 PM , Paul Jakma wrote about "PGP/MIME": > i've signed your key and uploaded to wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net. even if we > met face to face i still could not say for certain that you were the > rightful owner of the key. Sure we could. You show me your passport and I'll show mine, we'll need some training with customs' workers though ;) > however, on the basis that you are a regular poster to this forum, > i've signed your key, still no web of trust between us though. :) Ok, thanks :) - -- "Nothing is foolproof, because fools are so ingenius." ______________________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) Comment: Member of the PGP-Basics, Encryption Help Team iD8DBQE7t1Q+8WBGNj3ut+0RAlnoAKDZyC9WLs6gsAoPCbSxIfKRf25YOwCg02+0 Dc6KG3VTJSWyLf5MFi4kSYg= =hfkm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----